Skip to content Skip to main navigation Skip to footer

Subcommittee on Public Education

Parent Committee: Standing Committee on Education

Public Comments (PED)

2026 Regular Session HB4071 (Public Education)
Comment by: Tim Reinard on January 22, 2026 12:43
All that Data is available at https://wveis.k12.wv.us/essa/choose_district_sum.html?selected_district=029&year=2025.  Think the legislature should spend more time on rules for Charter schools as to what level of score they must obtain to stay in business and who checks finances for those schools.  They need controls also.
2026 Regular Session HB4071 (Public Education)
Comment by: malakai I pruitt on January 23, 2026 08:17
I don't think school report cards should be put on the internet where people can see it should for parental eyes only. I should be able to look up someones personal grades and schooling information online.
2026 Regular Session HB4077 (Public Education)
Comment by: Ashley Vaughn on January 21, 2026 08:40

I am writing to express my strong opposition and grave concern regarding any proposal to eliminate standardized testing in West Virginia’s public schools. While conversations about assessment reform are valid and necessary, removing standardized testing entirely would have devastating financial and educational consequences for our state.

Federal law, specifically the Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA), requires states to administer annual assessments in reading, math, and science as a condition of receiving federal education funding. If West Virginia were to eliminate these tests, we would immediately forfeit hundreds of millions of dollars in federal funds that support critical programs for students, including Title I services for low-income schools, special education supports, teacher development, and afterschool programs.

These funds are not optional or easily replaced. West Virginia’s state budget simply cannot absorb such a financial loss without catastrophic impacts on classrooms, staffing, and student services. The result would be larger class sizes, fewer resources, and diminished opportunities, especially for our most vulnerable students who rely most on federally supported programs.

While there is room for improvement in how assessments are designed and used, completely eliminating standardized testing is neither practical nor responsible. Instead, our focus should be on using assessment data more effectively in order to identify gaps, improve instruction, and ensure accountability while continuing to advocate for fairer, more meaningful ways to measure student learning.

I urge lawmakers to reject any proposal that jeopardizes our state’s compliance with federal education requirements. The long-term cost to our students and schools far outweighs any short-term political gain. West Virginia cannot afford to lose this essential funding or the educational safeguards that come with it.

2026 Regular Session HB4077 (Public Education)
Comment by: Vickie Billings on January 25, 2026 02:04
Students do not take these tests seriously.   Eliminate them.
2026 Regular Session HB4077 (Public Education)
Comment by: Toki on January 25, 2026 04:50
Whats the purpose of this? To make our public education worse? We're already behind the standard on everything; are y'all trying to hide that with this bill? 'cause its no secrete. We're the bottom 10 on almost everything education.   Are you planning on replacing standardized testing with a better system? If so what system(s)? While I agree standardized testing is an outdated way to test children and needs replaced with another (better) system(s). I am not okay with just removing standardized testing with nothing to replace it.
2026 Regular Session HB4077 (Public Education)
Comment by: Jamie Hazelwood on January 26, 2026 18:52
I am an elementary school teacher in Raleigh County and have been in a testing grade for 14 years. I can tell you that over the years testing has been pushed more and more to the point where I know instruction is being impacted. Second semester turns into teaching to the test. We spend a lot of time on the testing platform doing countless practice tests to get the students used to the types of questions and tools they might see on test day. While I agree some kind of tool needs to be used to have accountability, I think a lot rides on this one test. There needs to be some measure of proficiency in each grade level that also factors in growth. There is also the issue that K-2 does not have this same accountability. I have seen first hand that there is less pressure on early elementary teachers to have their students mastering standards and when they show up to 3rd grade behind, it becomes a problem because they are going to be taking the big test at the end of the year. More needs to be done early to ensure students are getting foundational skills in reading and math, so when they get to upper elementary and secondary, they are prepared, not just for a test, but for the actual content standards they are expected to master.
2026 Regular Session HB4077 (Public Education)
Comment by: Devin Medley on January 28, 2026 13:54

I can understand why they have issues with standardized testing. Its major focus on math and reading doesn’t shine light on other categories like music and other arts. However, I wouldn’t totally get rid of standardized tests. These tests show, not only knowledge in math and English, but an ability to follow coursework and discipline. If a child is scoring in the 900s there is an issue. Therefore, although I agree with some, I wouldn’t abolish these tests.

2026 Regular Session HB4090 (Public Education)
Comment by: Josh Roark on January 22, 2026 12:22
In what capacity are chaplains intended to be utilized by the schools?  In what way are they qualified?  And what is considered "willful malice"?  I accept there are religious persons with genuine and sincere desire to help others, even in some cases without invoking their particular branch of beliefs.  Without any standards or policies in place, however, this is simply too vague to be acceptable.  IF this were to be allowed, it would need to have strict protocols in place limiting the scope of practice allowed as well as offering options for parents to deny access to their children by said persons.  Also, what prohibits a given board from discriminating against certain beliefs?  Is this solely for Christian practitioners?  Is there any recourse if a Buddhist, Muslim, Scientologist, etc is denied this position while a Methodist or Baptist isn't?
2026 Regular Session HB4090 (Public Education)
Comment by: Jayli Flynn on January 23, 2026 15:51
I support the protection of students’ well-being and the desire to provide support resources in our schools. However, I have serious concerns with HB 4090 as drafted because of how similar chaplain programs have been implemented elsewhere — particularly in Florida, where political leaders publicly declared that Satanists and other non-Christian faiths would be excluded from participation, despite the legal requirement that the government remain neutral toward religion.   Under the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, the government may not favor one religion over another or exclude people from programs on the basis of their religious belief or non-belief.   Public schools in particular must remain neutral in matters of religion so that all students — Christians, adherents of minority religions, and non-religious students — feel respected and safe. In other states, similar proposals to allow chaplains in public schools have been criticized by civil-liberties and interfaith groups for potentially violating students’ religious freedom and creating unequal treatment.   Local school boards in Florida even voted against allowing chaplains due to these concerns.   Therefore, if HB 4090 moves forward, I urge the Legislature to amend it to include clear, enforceable language that: 1.Prohibits discrimination on the basis of religion or non-religion in program participation. 2.Requires religious neutrality, meaning any chaplain or volunteer must not promote one religion over another or engage in proselytizing. 3.Affirms equal access for people of all faiths and beliefs consistent with constitutional requirements. Students of all backgrounds deserve equal respect and protection of their religious freedoms. Public policy — especially in our public schools — should reflect that constitutional commitment to fairness and neutrality.
2026 Regular Session HB4090 (Public Education)
Comment by: Toki on January 25, 2026 05:19
separation of church and state
2026 Regular Session HB4090 (Public Education)
Comment by: Mariah Richards on January 29, 2026 15:42

I respectfully submit this comment in opposition to House Bill 4090.

While I recognize the intent to expand support services for students and families, HB 4090 raises significant constitutional, legal, and practical concerns when applied in a public school setting.

Public schools are state actors and must operate within the constraints of the First Amendment. Authorizing county boards of education to employ or accept volunteer chaplains (an inherently religious role) creates a substantial risk of violating the Establishment Clause by appearing to endorse religion or religious practice. This risk is heightened in schools, where students are minors and particularly vulnerable to perceived pressure or coercion from authority figures.

Even if participation is described as voluntary, courts have repeatedly held that subtle or indirect coercion in schools is constitutionally impermissible. A board-sanctioned chaplain operating within a school building may reasonably be perceived by students and families as representing the school’s approval of religion, or of particular religious beliefs, which public schools must avoid.

Additionally, the bill explicitly exempts chaplains from state certification and licensure requirements. This lack of standardized training and oversight raises serious concerns regarding religious neutrality, student rights, trauma-informed practices, and appropriate boundaries. Removing professional credentialing does not reduce risk, it increases it, both constitutionally and operationally.

The bill also provides no clear safeguards to ensure religious neutrality, denominational balance, or equal access for students who hold minority religious beliefs or no religious beliefs at all. Government entities may not favor one religion over another, nor religion over non-religion, and HB 4090 provides insufficient guardrails to prevent this outcome.

Finally, while the bill attempts to limit civil liability for chaplains, statutory immunity does not protect school districts from federal constitutional claims, litigation costs, or potential loss of federal funding. This legislation could place county boards in an untenable position, exposing them to legal challenges while offering little clarity on implementation or compliance.

West Virginia’s schools face urgent challenges related to academic outcomes, mental health, staffing shortages, and school safety. Any expansion of student support services should be clearly secular, professionally regulated, and constitutionally sound.

For these reasons, I urge the Legislature to reject House Bill 4090 or substantially revise it to ensure compliance with constitutional requirements and to protect students, families, and school districts.

Thank you for the opportunity to provide public comment.

Mariah Richards

2026 Regular Session HB4090 (Public Education)
Comment by: Brittany Singhass on January 29, 2026 15:54
Respectfully, this proposal should not be passed. Alloying someone to preach to my children at school when I may or may not agree with their ideals is a violation of the freedom of religion. There are currently after-school programs that are bible-based and if a parent wishes for their child to receive education on Christianity, they are welcome to join those after school programs. Unless you intend to add text to this bill that requires counties to provide volunteers of multiple religious backgrounds (Muslim, Buddhist, Christian, Jewish, and, yes. atheist), then this should not be passed.
2026 Regular Session HB4090 (Public Education)
Comment by: Nicole Kirby on January 29, 2026 16:16
As a Christian, I do not want my tax dollars to pay for a Chaplin in the schools.  As Christian Nationalists are taking over, I fear the type of Christianity that will be taught to my impressionable children. I want to raise kind men, who cheer for their wife’s careers, who support love and rights for all, and protect all people. I believe having a Chaplin in schools would compromise my parenting goals.
2026 Regular Session HB4122 (Public Education)
Comment by: Christy Black on January 19, 2026 17:54
This is a wonderful bill that would not only keep children safe, but also staff safe.
2026 Regular Session HB4122 (Public Education)
Comment by: Devin Spinks on January 19, 2026 18:57
How is this being funded? Schools are already fighting for resources and cameras are expensive.
2026 Regular Session HB4122 (Public Education)
Comment by: Brian Powell on January 19, 2026 20:23
I oppose this bill absent a mandate to provide additional state funding to pay for it.
2026 Regular Session HB4122 (Public Education)
Comment by: Brian Powell on January 19, 2026 20:37
Two years later and not even a cost-of-living adjustment to pay rates? Unacceptable. No wonder West Virginia has trouble retaining teachers.
2026 Regular Session HB4122 (Public Education)
Comment by: janice fenton on January 20, 2026 20:14
It's odd that the same people who won't allow the public to observe them doing their jobs would introduce this bill. You are the same people who have decided to have little or no oversight of home school situations or outcomes. I would like to know what you hope to accomplish with this. Is it your intent to protect teachers from baseless accusations? Is your intention to document physical or sexual abuse? How do teachers feel about this? Would you also put cameras in homes where children are being home schooled?...which would seem to be fair. I fear this could drive parents to take their children out of our schools as this seems to be a major invasion of their privacy. I feel like this is a bad idea but if the home schoolers will allow it I might be convinced to change my mind.
2026 Regular Session HB4122 (Public Education)
Comment by: Toki on January 29, 2026 02:17
Y'all what is the purpose of this? stairways/wells i get, but class rooms? nah i'm not for. Yes, I get where you're coming from, "more surveillance the safer the kids." That also depends on who has that type of information, where it is stored, and who has access to it.   On one hand you have more surveillance if something goes wrong, which is good. On the other hand what is someone with ill intentions has access to said footage, and does some less than moral things such as stalking a(n) student(s), or worse. To add to the last point, if the footage is stored improperly or on an unsecure network it will be at risk for vulnerabilities. You wouldnt want someone from a different state or country to have access to the cameras, especially in todays day in age with what some unsavories on X are doing with AI and photos. Also I would not want any video-- especially school surveillance video of my child uploaded to the internet, which may happen if done improperly. I'm going to be honest with you, as someone who as went through WV's public school system within the last decade or less-- I would not trust wv's public school system to implement it properly.
2026 Regular Session HB4122 (Public Education)
Comment by: Macy Elaine Prater on January 29, 2026 21:47
I respectfully disagree with HB 4122 with requiring that cameras must be installed in classrooms. Constant surveillance in classrooms can negatively change the dynamic of education and can discourage students from participating in class activities and assignments. It also raises concerns about students' privacy especially when minors are involved. Additionally, teachers deserve trust and students deserve a learning environment where they feel safe and not watched. Making it mandatory that cameras be present in classrooms risk creating fear rather than improving safety or supporting educational growth. I urge lawmakers to reconsider this bill and focus on solutions that support students and staff while respecting their privacy. 
2026 Regular Session HB4122 (Public Education)
Comment by: Daymien Garner on January 31, 2026 00:21
I disagree with this bill because cameras in classrooms can hurt student privacy. Students may feel uncomfortable or distracted knowing they are being recorded. Classrooms should be safe spaces for learning, not constant monitoring.
2026 Regular Session HB4122 (Public Education)
Comment by: Dreydon on February 3, 2026 08:54
I disagree with this bill. It is violating and there is no need for cameras to be inside of the classrooms. It hasn't been a problem so there is no need to "fix it."
2026 Regular Session HB4122 (Public Education)
Comment by: Alexis Layman on February 3, 2026 12:06

I agree with this bill as cameras in classrooms could ensure the safety of students as well as staff. accusations could be authenticated meanwhile deterring the acts of bullying, vandalism, theft, disruptions, and more. Classrooms would be held to more accountability, making the environment comfortable for work and learning. The safety of all individuals should be of priority, even in classrooms. The transition to this would be smooth, as there are already cameras in hallways, stairwells, outside the building, etc.

2026 Regular Session HB4132 (Public Education)
Comment by: toki on January 29, 2026 02:32
this seems like a good bill
2026 Regular Session HB4146 (Public Education)
Comment by: Sarah Dillon on February 3, 2026 12:04
So, one of the bills wants to make "herd immunity" enough for students to get by with.  If they've had it or been around it they are okay and don't have to get vaccinated.  There's another bill that grants students an option to not get vaccinated due to religious reasons.  However, this bill MANDATES that school employees MUST BE VACCINATED with no exceptions.  How is that even a thing?  If you don't make one get them, you can't make the other get them.  Teachers and school employees are not your puppets despite what you think.
2026 Regular Session HB4449 (Public Education)
Comment by: Jess Stan on January 19, 2026 19:57
I don’t believe this bill should be passed yet the way it’s written, the kids need More protection then this!!!!!!!!!!!!!
2026 Regular Session HB4449 (Public Education)
Comment by: Alexandra Barber on January 20, 2026 05:43
There are existing issues with the Special Education camera law that this was copied from. Legislation will be presented to change that law very soon and I would urge that this not be passed as it is currently written. The safety of children needs to be the main focus and given the utmost importance. Incidents should not be hidden to protect abusers, no matter their position or role.
2026 Regular Session HB4449 (Public Education)
Comment by: John. Snyder on January 20, 2026 18:49
Don’t agree as it’s written something needs done just not this
2026 Regular Session HB4449 (Public Education)
Comment by: linda on January 20, 2026 19:52
There are existing issues with the Special Education camera law that this was copied from. …Legislation will be presented to change that law very soon and I would urge that this not be passed as it is currently written.
2026 Regular Session HB4449 (Public Education)
Comment by: Kristen Thomas on January 21, 2026 21:58
There are existing issues with the Special Education camera law that this was copied from. Legislation will be presented to change that law very soon and I would urge that this not be passed as it is currently written.
2026 Regular Session HB4449 (Public Education)
Comment by: Chelsea Rae Gunther on February 1, 2026 21:13

As a West Virginia constituent in Beckley, Raleigh County, I support HB 4449.

In too many communities, vulnerable students and the staff trying to protect them can get trapped in systems where harm is minimized, buried, or handled through relationships and politics rather than transparent accountability. When there is a credible allegation of bullying, abuse, neglect, or misconduct, families deserve a process that does not rely only on competing narratives and closed-door decision-making.

This bill offers a practical tool: documentation. Recordings can reduce coverups, deter misconduct, and make it harder for “good old boy” networks to protect bad behavior. When something serious happens, evidence can help investigations move faster and more fairly, and it can protect both students and employees from false accusations.

I also appreciate that the bill includes guardrails like confidentiality requirements and limits on using recordings for teacher evaluations. Used properly, this is not about punishing educators. It is about safety, accountability, and clarity when an incident is alleged.

Please vote to pass HB 4449 and continue strengthening oversight so that recordings support real protection for students and staff, not institutional self-protection.

2026 Regular Session HB4449 (Public Education)
Comment by: jay tomblin on February 2, 2026 10:32

I feel like if there were cameras in the classrooms, it would be a good thing, so that if there was fhights, you can see who started it and get the best opinion on who is in the wrong. I feel like if there is camras in t eh class rooms, it would help subs and teachers if there are a lot of disruptions in the class, or like if there if there is a old sub or teachere who needs some help with kids who are being disrespecful then you are abel too look back at the camras and see who whos doing stuff to mess with people or who is disrupting the class. I feel like it would help the teachers give the right punishment to the people who are doing bad stuff in the classrooms, and if the teachers leave the room and nobody is in the room, you need somebody in there to make sure nobody is doing stuff when the teacher is not in the room.

2026 Regular Session HB4467 (Public Education)
Comment by: Angela Catrow on February 4, 2026 09:24
Good morning!  I am so thankful to see this Bill.  Our county says we care about children. However, a few years ago, our secretary was hospitalized due to pregnancy complications.  I had over 100 sick days to bank but the state regulations do not allow employees who are hospitalized due to pregnancy complications to use the sick bank.  This is disturbing & so frustrating.  Our county has no paternity leave.  We are so short staffed.  People who are sick or hospitalized for other things can use the sick bank.  If someone is hospitalized due to pregnancy complications, they should also be able to use the sick bank.  This is a small benefit to ask for but a huge blessing to pregnant employees.  Please pass this bill!
2026 Regular Session HB4467 (Public Education)
Comment by: Ragan Hite on February 4, 2026 11:20

I work for Berkeley County Schools and support House Bill 4467.

During a pregnancy, I experienced medical complications that required early labor intervention and doctor-ordered bed rest. At that time, I had already used much of my available leave for family medical needs. When I needed leave for my own pregnancy-related medical care, I had no remaining days and was forced to go unpaid.

A coworker attempted to donate sick leave to me, but the request was denied because my pregnancy complication did not fall within the limited conditions allowed under existing policy. Although the leave was medically necessary, it was excluded due to narrow definitions.

This bill would address that gap by clearly allowing pregnant employees and mothers of newborns to access the sick leave bank for maternity-related needs. Pregnancy complications do not always fit into a rigid list, and employees should not be penalized for that.

I urge you to support House Bill 4467 to ensure fair and consistent treatment of school employees during pregnancy and childbirth.

2026 Regular Session HB4485 (Public Education)
Comment by: Laura on January 21, 2026 09:47
This bill would be useful. It would also be useful to extend this to allow people who have sufficient sick leave to use it as they wish towards maternity leave rather than capping it at 6 weeks paid and 12 weeks unpaid. People should be able to use their sick leave as they see fit when caring for a young family.
2026 Regular Session HB4834 (Public Education)
Comment by: Alecia Martin on February 2, 2026 13:35

I am the mother of a female high school senior on the wrestling team in Gilmer County. She is the sole female athlete on the team and has been wrestling since her Freshman year. While this bill will not benefit her before graduation, I feel that it is important for me to share this information with you all for future girls with her determination.

With the growing recognition of women in wrestling, West Virginia has the opportunity to be at the forefront of supporting female athletes, creating a space for them to shine and grow. Female wrestling in West Virginia offers a variety of benefits for participants and the broader community. Here are some key advantages:

1. Empowerment & Confidence Building

  • Wrestling helps females build self-esteem and confidence by pushing physical and mental boundaries. The sport encourages perseverance, resilience, and the ability to overcome challenges, which are crucial life skills. My daughter has become a stronger athlete mentally since beginning her wrestling career. She sees that success comes from her strength and her perseverence rather than just from a team.

2. Physical Fitness & Health

  • Wrestling is an intense full-body workout that improves strength, flexibility, cardiovascular health, and coordination. It encourages healthy habits and discipline, as athletes need to maintain fitness for competition. This has peaked my daughter's interest in the athletic training career field and is shaping the professional she will become after graduation.

3. Equality in Sports

  • As female wrestling continues to grow, it offers an important platform for gender equality in sports. By having more opportunities for women to compete at a high level, it challenges traditional gender roles and promotes inclusivity.

4. Scholarship Opportunities

  • Female athletes in wrestling may gain access to college scholarships, which can help further their education and future careers. Many WV colleges and universities, or nearby states, are expanding opportunities for female athletes in wrestling, and some even offer full-ride scholarships for top competitors. This is a huge opportunity for our youth, however not having full support from the state and WVSSAC will prohibit girls from rising to their full potentional and having access to those scholarships.

5. Community Engagement

  • Women's sports help bring people together. As female wrestling grows in WV, it can create a sense of community, where families, friends, and local supporters rally around the athletes. This fosters stronger local ties and promotes support for women in sports.

6. Improved Mental Toughness

  • Wrestling is not only physically demanding but also mentally challenging. Athletes must strategize, stay focused under pressure, and keep a positive mindset even when faced with adversity. These mental skills can be applied to many areas of life. My daughter has learned to have a better attitude both on and off of the mat because she is the one facing scrutiny, not a team of people. She has learned that it is tough to lose but how to remain humble and support her other female opponents.

7. Role Models for Future Generations

  • As more women enter the wrestling world, they can become role models for young girls in the state who may not have considered wrestling as an option. Seeing strong, successful women in wrestling can inspire the next generation to pursue their own passions, regardless of gender.

8. Increased Interest in Women's Sports

  • Female wrestling in West Virginia can contribute to a broader cultural shift toward recognizing and celebrating women's sports. This can lead to better media coverage, more sponsorships, and increased visibility for women athletes, not just in wrestling but in other sports as well.

9. Teamwork and Social Skills

  • Even though wrestling is an individual sport, it often involves training in teams, where athletes learn to work together, motivate one another, and build camaraderie. This fosters strong interpersonal relationships and the ability to collaborate.

10. Breaking Stereotypes

  • Wrestling is often seen as a male-dominated sport, so when women break through in this area, it challenges outdated gender norms. Female wrestlers show that women can excel in any sport and that strength, toughness, and athleticism aren’t defined by gender.

WV has seen the rise of more local and state-level competitions specifically for female wrestlers. The West Virginia State Wrestling Tournament now includes female divisions, providing athletes with a platform to showcase their talent and compete for state titles. This is an important milestone for the sport, as it validates the hard work and dedication of female athletes, my daughter included, and gives them a chance to compete at the highest level in their state.

We would hope that you would consider passing this bill and celebrating the accomplishments of female wrestlers across the state. Wrestling is not a sport specifically for boys just as cheer or volleyball is not solely for females. We hope to see this assist girls in West Virginia to knowing that they are stronger than they think and that they can do anything that they put thier minds to!