Public Comments
I am in full support of SB927!
Please move bill SB 927 ahead without any changes.
As a medical cannabis card holder for West Virginia I publicly support this bill. I would like options because I can not use many of the products available to WV patients due to having asthma and there are very limited products available in my county. Please pass this for patients who need better options other than the flower or vapes, thank you.
I strongly support protecting bees and the beekeepers who care for them. Bees are essential to our food supply, local farms, and healthy ecosystems. Science-based, consistent protections are critical to keeping pollinators strong and agriculture thriving.
Protecting bees means protecting our food, our farmers, and our future.
Please support bill 927
Support for HB 5353
I support HB 5353 and appreciate the Legislature’s effort to address the rapid growth of virtual currency kiosks in West Virginia. As digital assets become more widely used, it is reasonable for policymakers to ensure that consumer protections, licensing requirements, and disclosure standards keep pace with new financial technologies. By bringing virtual currency kiosks under the existing framework for money transmission licensing, HB 5353 helps create a clearer regulatory environment for operators while providing safeguards for West Virginia residents who may use these machines. Thoughtful policy can protect consumers without preventing responsible innovation.Policy Suggestions to Strengthen HB 5353
1. Strong Fee Transparency Requirements
Consumers should clearly understand the costs associated with cryptocurrency kiosk transactions. Disclosure requirements should ensure that users see the total transaction fee, the exchange rate applied, and any additional service charges before completing a transaction.2. Consumer Education and Fraud Prevention
Cryptocurrency kiosks are sometimes used by scammers who instruct victims to send funds through these machines. HB 5353 could further protect consumers by encouraging clear scam warnings on kiosks, educational notices about common fraud schemes, and reporting mechanisms for suspicious transactions.3. Avoid Overly Restrictive Access Limits
While transaction limits may help reduce fraud, they should be designed carefully so they do not unintentionally block legitimate transactions. Many Americans use digital assets for lawful purposes such as remittances, savings, small business transactions, and participation in emerging financial networks.4. Maintain a Balanced Approach to Innovation
Blockchain technology and digital assets are part of a broader ecosystem that includes artificial intelligence infrastructure, data centers, high‑performance computing, and digital asset mining. West Virginia has natural advantages that position it well to attract these industries, including abundant energy resources and available industrial land. Balanced regulatory frameworks like HB 5353 can protect consumers while signaling that West Virginia remains open to responsible technology investment.Additional Policy Recommendations
5. Suggested Amendment: Clear Fee Disclosure Language
The Legislature may consider adding language requiring operators to disclose the full cost of a transaction before the consumer proceeds. Example concept language: "Prior to completing a transaction, the kiosk operator shall clearly disclose the total amount of all fees, the exchange rate applied to the transaction, and the net amount of virtual currency to be received by the consumer." This ensures consumers understand the true cost of the transaction before funds are transmitted.6. Suggested Amendment: Fraud Warning Requirements
Many crypto‑ATM scams involve victims being instructed by bad actors to send funds through kiosks. A simple statutory requirement for visible scam warnings could significantly reduce harm. Example concept language: "Virtual currency kiosks shall display a clear and conspicuous notice warning consumers of common fraud schemes and advising them not to send digital assets in response to unsolicited requests for payment."7. Policy Precedent from Other States
Several states have begun adopting similar consumer protection frameworks for digital asset kiosks. Common policy tools include:- mandatory fee disclosures
- transaction transparency requirements
- anti‑fraud warnings and consumer education
- licensing through existing money transmission frameworks
Conclusion
HB 5353 represents a constructive effort to address emerging digital asset technologies while protecting West Virginia consumers. With strong transparency provisions, fraud protections, and balanced regulatory standards, the bill can help create a responsible framework that supports both consumer safety and technological innovation. I appreciate the Legislature’s attention to this issue and look forward to continued dialogue on how West Virginia can responsibly engage with emerging digital infrastructure.- I am in favor of Senate Bill 927. Bees are so crucial to our environment in many ways. Pollination is essential for many plants to produce fruit and seeds and to also the continuation of plant life. Honey is also a valuable resource for antioxidant, wound healing, soothing sore throats, and improving heart health.
Public Comment on HB 5060
Submitted by: Shekinah Apedo, Esq. West Virginia Blockchain FoundationSupport for HB 5060
I appreciate the Legislature’s attention to emerging digital asset policy through HB 5060. The bill reflects an important step toward modernizing West Virginia’s legal and regulatory framework as digital assets, blockchain infrastructure, and decentralized technologies continue to expand globally. Digital asset policy is no longer theoretical. Individuals, businesses, and investors across the United States are actively participating in blockchain-based networks. West Virginia’s willingness to engage with these technologies demonstrates that the state is serious about economic competitiveness and innovation. HB 5060 moves West Virginia in a constructive direction by recognizing the need for clear rules while allowing space for technological development. Thoughtful policy can both protect consumers and signal to builders, entrepreneurs, and investors that West Virginia is open to responsible innovation.Policy Considerations and Suggestions
While the bill represents positive progress, a few considerations may help strengthen its long-term effectiveness.1. Ensure Consumer Protection Without Blocking Access
Digital asset kiosks and other access points should operate transparently and responsibly. However, policy should avoid restrictions that unintentionally block legitimate consumer access to digital assets or discourage lawful businesses from operating in West Virginia. Clear fee disclosure requirements, transaction transparency, and fraud prevention measures can address consumer protection concerns while still maintaining access to digital financial infrastructure.2. Encourage Regulatory Clarity for Businesses
Businesses operating in the digital asset space benefit from clear guidance. Establishing predictable compliance expectations can help legitimate operators enter the market while discouraging bad actors. Clarity in licensing, reporting requirements, and consumer protections will help build a stable regulatory environment.3. Recognize the Broader Digital Infrastructure Opportunity
Digital asset policy should also consider the broader economic ecosystem that accompanies blockchain technology. Industries such as high-performance computing, artificial intelligence infrastructure, data centers, and digital asset mining rely on similar energy, networking, and compute resources. West Virginia’s energy resources, available industrial land, and access to water place the state in a strong position to attract these industries if regulatory frameworks remain balanced and forward-looking.4. Maintain Flexibility as Technology Evolves
Blockchain technology continues to evolve rapidly. Policy frameworks should remain adaptable so that regulations written today do not unintentionally limit future technological development or new use cases. Periodic legislative review or reporting requirements could help ensure that policy keeps pace with innovation.Conclusion
HB 5060 represents an encouraging step toward responsible digital asset policy in West Virginia. By combining consumer protection with regulatory clarity and openness to innovation, the Legislature can position the state as a welcoming environment for emerging technology industries. I appreciate the opportunity to provide these comments and look forward to continued dialogue on how West Virginia can responsibly embrace the next generation of digital infrastructure.Honey Bees are beneficial to everyone.
Everyone that consumes honey products. Everyone that has flowers. Everyone that plants a garden. We all eat, and need honey bees as pollinators! Please save/allow beekeepers to keep the bees going! Without their beneficial pollinators, we will eventually not have any crops. No crops = no food Thanks for your attention to this very important matter!- To Standing Committee on the Judiciary
Need help government assistance pay some debt off
West Virginia needs to be one of the first to protect the bees . Start banning weed killers . Bees are life for humans . With out bees we are in major trouble . We need to start making insensitive for people to start bee keeping . Maybe even. A tax credit for every hive up to 5 . Honey bees keep us feed , we need to protect the them !
Senate Bill 927 needs to pass! Beekeepers are a diverse group of people, democrats, republicans, and Independents and most importantly motivated voters. Beekeepers are farms and their bees provide the essence of life to the plants we eat and the beautiful flowers the decorate our landscapes and homes.
🐝
Oppose SB 392
The House's budget already slashes Medicaid by nearly $100 million and does not address essential funding needs for public education, child care assistance, water infrastructure, and other critical areas. Enacting this tax cut would necessitate an additional $125 million reduction in the budget, likely leading to even more severe cuts to programs that matter to our communities. With working families receiving less than $1 per week from the proposed tax cuts, this deal is inadequate for everyone. We must tell lawmakers that West Virginians deserve investments in people, care, and public infrastructure—not reckless tax cuts that benefit only the wealthiest few.I rise in opposition to House Bill 5687.
For more than a century, West Virginia’s economy has been built around the extraction of our natural resources. Coal companies have generated enormous wealth from these mountains. But too often, that wealth did not stay in the communities where it was created. Profits flowed to corporate headquarters and distant investors while the people of West Virginia were left to deal with the long-term consequences.
Those consequences are still with us today: damaged landscapes, polluted streams, struggling communities, and an economy that was never allowed to fully diversify.
House Bill 5687 would once again cut taxes for the coal industry. Supporters may claim this will increase production or bring back coal jobs, but the reality is that market forces, automation, and changes in the global energy economy—not state tax policy—drive coal production today. A tax cut will not reverse those trends.
What this bill will do is remove hundreds of millions of dollars from the state budget over time.
That revenue should be used to strengthen the public services that West Virginians depend on—maintaining our roads and bridges, investing in public schools, ensuring safe drinking water, protecting our natural resources, and supporting the communities that powered this country for generations.
West Virginians are tired of being treated as disposable while our resources are extracted and the wealth leaves the state. If companies profit from our mountains, then they should also contribute to repairing the damage and supporting the communities that made those profits possible.
This legislature should be working to rebuild West Virginia’s economy and invest in its people—not continuing a cycle where the state weakens its own revenue base while expecting communities to make do with less.
For those reasons, I urge you to reject House Bill 5687.
West Virginia currently ranks 49th in the nation in median household income. That fact alone should frame this entire conversation.
Senate Bill 392 proposes a 10% reduction in the state income tax. For the average West Virginia household, that reduction would amount to less than $30 a month. That is the reality of what this policy delivers to most families.
At the same time, the bill removes roughly $250 million in revenue from the state budget.
That $250 million matters far more than a $30 monthly tax cut.
West Virginians are not asking the government for symbolic gestures. They are asking for the basic services that the government is supposed to provide under the social contract between citizens and the state.
We should be using that revenue to fix our roads and bridges, maintain clean and reliable water systems, strengthen our public schools, and protect the natural resources that define this state. Those investments are what actually improve the quality of life for the people who live here.
Instead, we continue to see partisan politics driving policy decisions that weaken the state’s ability to meet those responsibilities. Every time we cut the revenue that funds public services, we make it harder to address the very problems that people across West Virginia raise every day.
West Virginia is not New Jersey, and we should stop trying to import political talking points and ideological experiments that do not reflect the realities of our state.
Our state ranks near the bottom in income, population growth, and economic opportunity. The solution to those problems is not to continue ravaging the limited revenue we have available to invest in our communities.
If we want West Virginia to grow and thrive, we must invest in the things that make communities livable and competitive: education, infrastructure, public health, and environmental stewardship.
Those are not partisan priorities. They are the government's basic responsibilities.
For those reasons, I urge the legislature to reject SB 392 and focus instead on strengthening the foundations that West Virginians rely on every day.
Thank you for your time.
Please vote to invest these dollars in public services that help children, families, and workers thrive. We do not need tax cuts that will only help the wealthiest among us, and will cut funding from important programs for families in West Virginia.