Skip to content Skip to main navigation Skip to footer

Public Comments

2026 Regular Session SB927 (Government Organization)
Comment by: Connie W Cole on March 4, 2026 09:56
Keep bees in Strong Agriculture. Strong Bees
🐝
2026 Regular Session SB927 (Government Organization)
Comment by: Christine Armstrong on March 4, 2026 09:55
Please support this bill. For the sake of bees and their survival please support this bill.   I have been a beekeeper for 10 years, and understand.
2026 Regular Session SB927 (Government Organization)
Comment by: Linda Casey on March 4, 2026 09:44
I find it hard to understand why anyone would be against SB 927. This bill will regulate the beekeeping industry in WV in a uniform manner and places the authority for regulation where it should be (with the Department of Agriculture). It does not mean that nuisance situations cannot be handled; it means that these situations will be dealt with in a concise and uniform manner. The beekeeping industry in WV is alive and growing and needs this bill to continue to grow in a safe manner. We bring needed income within the state, as well as a very necessary service. Pollination, not only of crops and flowers, but also native trees and shrubs, keeps this state and this country going. Let's work together to make beekeeping safer for everyone.
2026 Regular Session SB927 (Government Organization)
Comment by: Maxwell Monk on March 4, 2026 09:40
As a lifelong resident of West Virginia, I’m in support of SB937 as it is currently written. Individual municipalities controlling rules around beekeeping makes compliance with regulations very difficult, especially for those practicing the activities across multiple jurisdictions. Beekeepers perform an important service which is crucial to our environmental needs, and many enjoy practicing the activity as a hobby. I see nothing wrong with SB937 as it stands and I believe it will only bring about benefits for those it concerns.
2026 Regular Session SB927 (Government Organization)
Comment by: Susan Casdorph on March 4, 2026 09:31
I support urban agriculture and that requires healthy bees. I support SB 927 and urge all house Delegates to do the same. Please vote yes to pass this vital bill!
2026 Regular Session SB927 (Government Organization)
Comment by: Dana Gray on March 4, 2026 09:23
Good morning, what a great day for WV beekeepers if this bill goes through. We need this legislation to move forward as written without amendment, without weakening language and without a patchwork of local control. Honeybees are not a nuisance, they are vital to our WV ecosystem and food supply. Help protect that by supporting SB927 The West Virginia Apiary Act as written. Dana Gray  
2026 Regular Session SB927 (Government Organization)
Comment by: Bob Spencer on March 4, 2026 09:19
Please pass SB 927 without any amendments. The Dept of Agriculture is the expert at bee management and should be the sole regulatory body for WV Beekeepers.
2026 Regular Session SB927 (Government Organization)
Comment by: Debra Alford on March 4, 2026 09:03
Chris Phillips Please put Senate Bill 927 on the agenda to be voted on by the senate for this period.   We need to sustain bees to have food for everyone throughout the world. Your assistance in this matter is appreciated.   D. Gail Alford  
2026 Regular Session SB927 (Government Organization)
Comment by: Belinda Smiley on March 4, 2026 08:45
As a WV beekeeper for 6 years and current board member of the Mercer County Beekeepers Association I ask that you approve SB927 and move it along as written.  We should continue to operate under the training, oversite and inspections of the WV Dept of Agriculture, their Commissioner and their trained staff.  Allowing individual municipalities to regulate beekeeping would be confusing and  detrimental to an already fragile segment of agriculture in our State.
2026 Regular Session SB927 (Government Organization)
Comment by: Sidney Sisson on March 4, 2026 08:24
I support SB 927 and ask that it be passed as is without any amendments, weakening language, or patchwork local control. Bees and beekeepers are an important part of our ecosystem and agricultural economy!
2026 Regular Session SB927 (Government Organization)
Comment by: Donn Cyrus on March 4, 2026 08:16
Please let bee keeper's keep bee's safely. We need all bee's to educate and to sustain life. (tree's,plants, vegetable, humans)
2026 Regular Session SB927 (Government Organization)
Comment by: Richard Schamberger on March 4, 2026 08:13
As owner of Schamberger honey the largest honey producer in the mid Ohio valley I fully support this bill and would like to see it's passage into law.
2026 Regular Session SB927 (Government Organization)
Comment by: Hud McClanahan on March 4, 2026 08:05
As President of the Mercer County Beekeepers Association, I ask that you support and move this bill along as written. The bill is important to beekeepers so we can have one set of rules developed by persons with the requisite knowledge and skill of beekeeping. Many of us have hives in municipalities, the countryside, cities, and neighborhoods. If each jurisdiction is allowed to make its own rules, compliance would be nearly impossible. Please support the bill as written and provide us with consistency and the ability to comply. Feel free to contact me if you would like to discuss.
2026 Regular Session SB486 (Government Organization)
Comment by: Teresa McBee on March 4, 2026 07:05
This would be a huge win for West Virginia jobs!
2026 Regular Session SB927 (Government Organization)
Comment by: Richard Stonestreet on March 4, 2026 05:43
I urge your support of SB 927 without amendments. Bees and beekeeping are vital components of a strong agriculture, which, in turn, strengthens West Virginia.
2026 Regular Session SB927 (Government Organization)
Comment by: Clint Baker on March 4, 2026 05:42
Please pass this much needed bill to protect the honeybees
2026 Regular Session SB927 (Government Organization)
Comment by: Robert White on March 4, 2026 05:28
I support SB927 because bees and their keepers are invaluable resources to the state of West Virginia and its economy and should be permitted to do their jobs unimpeded. Please get this passed today. We all depend on it. Thanks.
2026 Regular Session SB927 (Government Organization)
Comment by: Jamie White on March 4, 2026 05:25
I support SB 927 without amendments, without weakening language, without  patchwork local control. Let beekeepers keep their bees, let the proper authority oversee them, and keep politics from preventing them doing their jobs well. We all depend on it. Thank you.
2026 Regular Session SB927 (Government Organization)
Comment by: Stephanie Birchfield on March 4, 2026 02:11

I support SB927 with no amendments or weakened language. This bill addresses issues relevant to beekeepers and residents. It should be solely regulated by the Department of Agriculture and not outlying municipalities, which can cause a lot of conflict, and be overly burdensome to beekeepers. Passing this bill as it stands is GOOD for West Virginia.

2026 Regular Session SB927 (Government Organization)
Comment by: Emily Asbury on March 3, 2026 23:52
As a long time friend to beekeepers I’m writing in support of senate bill 927 as is without amendment or weakened language. Bee keeping is so very important to West Virginia and I believer what is best for the protection of hives and keepers is what is best agriculturally.
2026 Regular Session SB927 (Government Organization)
Comment by: Brenda Gasper on March 3, 2026 22:42
Please vote for 927 to help beekeepers. Bees are so important to the environment and beekeepers need our support. The bill covers rules important to beekeepers and their neighbors.
2026 Regular Session SB927 (Government Organization)
Comment by: Fr. Phillip Szabo on March 3, 2026 22:37
To whom it may concern. I am in favor of protecting the rights of private citizens to cultivate honey bee populations in the state, whether within or outside of city limits. Any suggestion that beekeeping is dangerous or harmful to other persons and the environment simply betrays grave ignorance both to the essential role that honey bees play in the food industry as well as their harmless behavior towards those who come across them. Please vote in favor of Senate Bill 927 for the sake of food security in this state and the time-honored tradition of keeping bees. Thank you!
2026 Regular Session SB927 (Government Organization)
Comment by: Ashley Dolin on March 3, 2026 22:29
SB-927 Please vote for this bill with no ammendment. The Department of Agriculture is well equipped to handle what is needed to regulate beekeeping in urban areas. Those who are voted into city offices do not know how to keep bees nor what beekeepers do in order to properly maintain their hives. As an urban beekeeper I follow the better business management plan and register my apiary with the state annually.  Honey bees cause no harm and are very helpful pollinators in any community they are welcomed to. I have been keeping bees over a decade now and have learned so much about hives and all the positive aspects of having honey bees. The city officials who try to regulate urban bee keepers are not doing so with the same knowledge know by the Department of Agriculture.  Please pass this SB-927 so urban beekeepers can help our cities with polonators who not only help flowers, but can provide honey as well.
2026 Regular Session SB486 (Government Organization)
Comment by: Julia McDonald Yuhasz on March 3, 2026 22:27
I support this bill!
2026 Regular Session SB927 (Government Organization)
Comment by: Scott Dicken on March 3, 2026 22:25
To the extent that bees need to be regulated in West Virginia, that should be done exclusively by the Department of Ag, and not through the various municipalities. Bees do not pose a risk to public safety. Municipalities are in the way of honey production.
2026 Regular Session SB486 (Government Organization)
Comment by: Cindy Ritz on March 3, 2026 22:15
I am in favor of this bill.
2026 Regular Session SB486 (Government Organization)
Comment by: Michelle Sadat on March 3, 2026 22:15
I am in support of this bill and allowing for a master esthetics license in WV.
2026 Regular Session SB486 (Government Organization)
Comment by: STEVE RITZ on March 3, 2026 22:13
I am in favor of this bill.
2026 Regular Session SB927 (Government Organization)
Comment by: Sarah Saville on March 3, 2026 21:53
Please pass the SB927 the bee bill. Please support WV bees and their stewards
2026 Regular Session SB927 (Government Organization)
Comment by: Melissa Stahlin on March 3, 2026 21:49
I support Senate Bill 927 as it now stands. I understand that statewide regulation is better for the art of beekeeping than allowing localities to create regulations. I believe beekeepers are performing a vital service for everyone, and that state support is important to make their job easier.
2026 Regular Session SB927 (Government Organization)
Comment by: Mason Sutler on March 3, 2026 21:02

I am a massive supporter of honey bees having raised many with my family and neighbors and have seen the positive impact they have on the environment and farms in my community. The bees provide pollen to the farmers in my community helping their crops, which helps to feed livestock. The bees also provide honey which brings lots of income in a state which needs as much as possible. I have also throughout the years of raising them they have never stung me or anyone I know and I walk near their boxes with no suit and they pay no mind. Thus I am asking anyone republican or democrat to support the bees as they are a massive benefit to the community and environment of this great state of West Virginia.  I know major cities in West Virginia and other places safely have urban beehives. We just need common sense and freedom loving legislation

2026 Regular Session SB486 (Government Organization)
Comment by: Denise Phelps on March 3, 2026 20:50
I’m in support of this bill.
2026 Regular Session SB486 (Government Organization)
Comment by: Lani on March 3, 2026 20:49
The Master Esthetician addition makes great sense for attracting additional business toward the state and region - I support this.
2026 Regular Session SB486 (Government Organization)
Comment by: Jennifer Rolston on March 3, 2026 20:41
I support this bill!
2026 Regular Session SB486 (Government Organization)
Comment by: Hillary Abshire on March 3, 2026 20:38
I am very pleased with the State of West Virginia for considering the addition of the Master Esthetician program to its curriculum. Expanding educational opportunities within the beauty and wellness industry is an important step toward strengthening our workforce and supporting small business growth across the state. Advanced esthetic education provides students with specialized training in skin health, advanced treatments, and modern techniques that are increasingly in demand. Offering a Master Esthetician pathway would not only elevate professional standards within the industry but also create new career opportunities for West Virginians who wish to build sustainable and successful businesses. Programs like this help keep talented individuals in our state, encourage entrepreneurship, and support the continued growth of the personal care and wellness sector. I strongly support the development and implementation of a Master Esthetician program and believe it would be a valuable investment in both our workforce and our economy. Thank you for considering this important advancement in education and professional development for West Virginia.
2026 Regular Session SB486 (Government Organization)
Comment by: Jeremy Rodgers on March 3, 2026 20:34
I support this!
2026 Regular Session SB486 (Government Organization)
Comment by: Aubrey McBee on March 3, 2026 20:33

I strongly support this bill. It would be a meaningful step forward for the cosmetology profession and the people it serves.

2026 Regular Session SB486 (Government Organization)
Comment by: Colleen Kradel on March 3, 2026 20:29
I want a master esthetics license in WV. I am in support of this bill.
2026 Regular Session SB486 (Government Organization)
Comment by: Kiersten Abshire on March 3, 2026 20:26
I am licensed esthetician in Berkeley County, WV. Although I am able to offer many services, I feel our scope is limited compared to surrounding competing states. The Master Esthetics License would greatly benefit all estheticians in our state. Offering more continuing education, opportunities and broadening the scope for a variety of services would take our craft very far and allow for us to stay competitive.
2026 Regular Session SB486 (Government Organization)
Comment by: Tracy Regalia on March 3, 2026 20:26
I am in support of this bill! Please pass!
2026 Regular Session SB927 (Government Organization)
Comment by: Amber Penner on March 3, 2026 20:25
The world needs honey bees. West Virginia needs honey bees. South Charleston needs honey bees. Bees are an integral part to local farms and homesteads. Even those with small back-porch gardens need bees. No bees=no food. Allow us to be keep in South Charleston! This is very worthwhile.
2026 Regular Session SB927 (Government Organization)
Comment by: Ralph J Seward on March 3, 2026 20:23

Please allow this bill move forward as written:

  • Without amendments
  • Without weakening language
  • Without patchwork local control
Thank you, Ralph Seward  
2026 Regular Session SB486 (Government Organization)
Comment by: Kaitlin Guyer on March 3, 2026 20:21
I support this bill. Thank you!
2026 Regular Session SB927 (Government Organization)
Comment by: Donnie Lively on March 3, 2026 20:21
I understand the role bees play in agriculture. I live in a city where our homes are close together.  My wife has an allergy to bee stings and for that reason I do not want bee hives in my neighborhood.  Thanks for the opportunity to comment.
2026 Regular Session SB486 (Government Organization)
Comment by: Hayley on March 3, 2026 20:15
I support this bill! It would be incredibly beneficial to have a master esthetician license in Wv!!
2026 Regular Session SB486 (Government Organization)
Comment by: Julie Monroe on March 3, 2026 20:15
I support this bill
2026 Regular Session SB486 (Government Organization)
Comment by: Cecilia Perkins on March 3, 2026 20:11
I support this bill!
2026 Regular Session SB486 (Government Organization)
Comment by: Heather C. on March 3, 2026 20:10
I’m in support of this bill—we want a master esthetics license in WV!
2026 Regular Session SB927 (Government Organization)
Comment by: Elizabeth Foley on March 3, 2026 20:10
With all the other environmental challenges we face in West Virginia, I would think beekeeping would be a no brainer. Bees are such a wonderful natural resource helping to pollinate and producing nature's healing HONEY. Please consider mandating this movement. It can only help!
2026 Regular Session SB486 (Government Organization)
Comment by: Chelsea on March 3, 2026 20:09
Adding the Master Esthetics definition would be a huge win for the beauty industry in WV. Thousands of WV jobs would be positively affected and hundreds of new jobs would be created.
2026 Regular Session SB927 (Government Organization)
Comment by: Roger Zirkle on March 3, 2026 20:05
  1. Supporting Bill 927 is good for WV im a Beekeeper  and we need to keep this Bill  totally to the WV agriculture Department   not Government Ran per States that dont know WV's.
2026 Regular Session SB927 (Government Organization)
Comment by: Sarah Ferrell on March 3, 2026 19:58
It is important that the bill move forward as written:   Without amendments Without weakening language Without patchwork local control   Bees are a vital resource to keeping the environment healthy.
2026 Regular Session SB927 (Government Organization)
Comment by: Amy Wieloh-Darmelio on March 3, 2026 19:52

As a female beekeeper and former officer of the Monongalia County Bee Club, I am writing to express my strong support for SB 927 as written, without amendment.

Beekeeping in West Virginia is more than a hobby or profession — it is stewardship. For generations, our work has been guided by science-based oversight through the West Virginia Department of Agriculture, with careful attention to disease management, responsible hive practices, and public safety using established best management practices.

This structure has protected beekeepers, consumers, and our agricultural community alike.

As someone who works closely with bees and fellow beekeepers, I believe SB 927 preserves  our industry to thrive while maintaining necessary safeguards. I respectfully ask that you support this bill in its current form.

Thank you for your consideration and for your service to our state.

2026 Regular Session SB927 (Government Organization)
Comment by: Bud Cottrill on March 3, 2026 19:21
I am in support of Senate Bill 927 - the “Bee Bill” - as it is written without amendments or changes in language. Regulation and management of the beekeeping industry should remain in control of the WV Department of Agriculture.
2026 Regular Session SB927 (Government Organization)
Comment by: James M Smith on March 3, 2026 19:16
I strongly support WV SB 927, which clarifies the Commissioner of Agriculture's exclusive authority to regulate bees, bee equipment, and apiaries under the West Virginia Apiary Act. By establishing uniform statewide guidelines, this bill eliminates the patchwork of conflicting local ordinances that burden beekeepers and hinder agricultural innovation. Honeybees are vital pollinators essential to West Virginia's farms and food security, and empowering the Department of Agriculture to oversee registration, inspections, and pest management will better protect these crucial insects while shielding compliant agricultural operations from frivolous nuisance lawsuits. Passing this legislation will foster a thriving beekeeping community, boost our rural economy, and ensure consistent, science-based practices across the state for generations to come.
2026 Regular Session SB927 (Government Organization)
Comment by: Anita Urban on March 3, 2026 19:12
Bees are essential for life.  They are not livestock or a farm animal.  Pass this bill so everyone can have bees if they want.  Government should not dictate who can or cannot be a beekeeper at their own home.  No bees no food, flowers, trees.
2026 Regular Session SB927 (Government Organization)
Comment by: Charlene Herring on March 3, 2026 19:10
We will starve to death , when the bees are gone.
2026 Regular Session SB927 (Government Organization)
Comment by: Marqkita Sexton on March 3, 2026 19:00
Pass SB 927 without amendment!  Without local interference. Keep beekeeping science based ! And not up to locals who dont know or understand bees or who may not be consistent.
2026 Regular Session SB927 (Government Organization)
Comment by: Shawna Cross on March 3, 2026 18:08
I support SB 927 The Bee Bill as written without amendments.  Beekeeping is important to our state and to our food supply.  I am a beekeeper that got into municipal politics by petitioning The City of Westover to change an ordinance to allow urban beekeeping. Westover did change their ordinance in 2022 and has been a Bee City USA affiliate since 2023. Please support the bill.
2026 Regular Session SB927 (Government Organization)
Comment by: Christian Coby on March 3, 2026 18:06
I support SB 927 without amendments. Effective apiary regulation should be science-based and administered by subject-matter experts. The West Virginia Department of Agriculture has the technical knowledge to manage bee health, disease control, and public safety using established best management practices. Maintaining uniform statewide oversight ensures decisions are guided by biology and evidence, not inconsistent local policies. Please pass SB 927 as written.
2026 Regular Session SB927 (Government Organization)
Comment by: Cynthia Nicholas on March 3, 2026 18:06
Please support SB927.  Without bees in WV we would have no farms.
2026 Regular Session SB927 (Government Organization)
Comment by: Danny w.cochran on March 3, 2026 17:52
No comments.
2026 Regular Session SB927 (Government Organization)
Comment by: Amanda Dorsey on March 3, 2026 17:39
Please support and pass SB 927 in its clean form with no amendments.
Beekeeping is essential to the state, and back yard beekeepers are allowed by state law, but we have been prohibited by our local HOAs classifying bees as livestock in order to restrict the practice of beekeeping.
This legislation protects: • Statewide regulatory consistency • The authority of the Commissioner of Agriculture • WV Best Management Practice regulations • Beekeepers from patchwork local restrictions
This bill preserves clear statewide authority under the West Virginia Department of Agriculture and reinforces the existing WV Best Management Practice regulations — ensuring consistent, science-based oversight of apiaries across our state.
SB 927 protects West Virginia beekeepers under statewide, science-based regulation through the WV Department of Agriculture. Without amendments. Without weakening language. Without patchwork local control. Strong bees = Strong agriculture Strong agriculture = Strong West Virginia
Please protect back yard beekeepers, bees, and apiaries! Thank you!
2026 Regular Session SB927 (Government Organization)
Comment by: Gilford L Haines on March 3, 2026 17:18
I support SB 927.  Beekeeping goes way beyond a hobby in West Virginia.   For our farmers and small scale growers, to pollinators. We all put our faith in our  West Virginia Agricultural Department to have stability for our entire state.  Please continue SB 927 with no amendments. Thank you
2026 Regular Session SB927 (Government Organization)
Comment by: Vicki Schafer on March 3, 2026 16:50
I support allowing honey bees to be kept in city limits with regulations (number of hives per available property). Honey bees are non aggressive and perfectly safe, as well as crucial and even beneficial to the environment. Please educate yourself if you believe otherwise before making a decision detrimental to the community.
2026 Regular Session SB927 (Government Organization)
Comment by: Becki Williams on March 3, 2026 15:39
I have absolutely no problem with people having honey bees. They're essential. They bother no one or any thing. I keep several flower beds full of flowers that attract them. Local honey is the best. As long as the keepers know what they're doing I have no problem. Chickens etc are completely different and shouldn't be allowed in city limits but bees? No problem and also no amendments. I'd have zero issue with a neighbor having bees. None whatsoever.  
2026 Regular Session SB927 (Government Organization)
Comment by: Clayton Thorne on March 3, 2026 15:31

Please support SB 927 to help strengthen and protect our bee population.

2026 Regular Session SB927 (Government Organization)
Comment by: Nicole Grimes on March 3, 2026 15:27
I support SB 927. 🐝
2026 Regular Session SB927 (Government Organization)
Comment by: Beth Holstein on March 3, 2026 15:19
As the great granddaughter of a beekeeper (deceased) I certainly understand that honey bees are needed to produce our food! In recent years I’ve followed reports that document the Decline of honeybees & that is a very scary thought! Honeybees won’t bother you as a rule. My great grandfather aggravated the hives in order to be stung for his arthritis. We played in fields of clover & were never stung. Please, please rethink your backward thinking. I cook with honey nearly every day! 🐝
2026 Regular Session SB927 (Government Organization)
Comment by: Mary Kathryn Molitor on March 3, 2026 15:11
As a single mother of 3 beautiful little girls, gardening started as a hobby and then it has turned into a necessity with the rising costs of groceries, utilities, and everything in between - please pass the Bee Bill with NO amendments, food security is a very a real thing.
2026 Regular Session SB927 (Government Organization)
Comment by: Lisa knight on March 3, 2026 14:39
as a small bee keeper in Barbour county, I fully support this bill. We are loosing bees every year, and we need more protection and encouragement for bee keepers . Not only are they great pollinators, they produce a great form of sweeteners for diabetics. The local honey helps with medical issues, like allergies and cancer patients, just to name a couple. Please pass this bill unaltered.  Thank you, 🐝
2026 Regular Session SB927 (Government Organization)
Comment by: Mike Lamp on March 3, 2026 13:50
As President of the West Virginia Beekeepers Association, I strongly support SB 927 as written, without amendments. Beekeeping in West Virginia has long operated under science-based oversight through the West Virginia Department of Agriculture. This statewide framework ensures consistent regulation, coordinated disease management, and responsible hive stewardship. Uniform standards protect not only beekeepers and farmers, but also our communities. Clear, statewide regulation helps prevent unmanaged colonies, reduces disease risk, and ensures bees are kept responsibly in a way that supports both agriculture and the public. SB 927 strengthens that framework and should be passed without alteration.
2026 Regular Session SB927 (Government Organization)
Comment by: Renee Brooks on March 3, 2026 13:48
I support SB 927 without amendments. I was a cookie vendor at the WV Winter Blues Farmers Market and there were many bee vendors that could could use this type of Legislation. With the sprawling landscape that is West Virginia, Bee Keeping in general is a core monetary way of life for some of these vendors - or they at least benefit monetarily from having their apiary. 🐝
2026 Regular Session SB927 (Government Organization)
Comment by: Sharon Adams on March 3, 2026 13:28

I firmly believe that honey bees should be allowed, and so should reasonable rules and regulations. Without bees to pollinate our fruits, vegetables, and flowers, we risk relying on lab-grown alternatives. Backyard chickens should also be permitted with sensible regulations. 🐝

2026 Regular Session SB927 (Government Organization)
Comment by: Susan Hawkins on March 3, 2026 12:38
1:13
As a small farm owner and beekeeper I support SB 927 without amendments. Pollination supports West Virginia agriculture and farm income. Uniform statewide regulation protects investment and keeps agriculture predictable. Please pass SB 927 as written to protect our state’s agricultural economy.
2026 Regular Session SB927 (Government Organization)
Comment by: Robyn Clark on March 3, 2026 11:28
I strongly support SB 927. Beekeeping is not just a hobby in West Virginia — it is essential infrastructure for our agriculture, food supply, and rural economy. Pollinators directly support fruit, vegetable, and seed production across our state. SB 927 keeps oversight under the West Virginia Department of Agriculture, where regulation can remain science-based, consistent, and statewide. That consistency matters. Patchwork local control would create confusion, discourage new beekeepers, and undermine the stability our agricultural community depends on. Clear, uniform standards protect: Beekeepers Farmers Property owners Consumers Strong bees mean strong agriculture. Strong agriculture means a stronger West Virginia. I urge you to pass SB 927 without weakening amendments and maintain statewide, science-driven regulation under the WV Department of Agriculture. Thank you for your consideration.
2026 Regular Session SB927 (Government Organization)
Comment by: Licia Pannell on March 3, 2026 11:26
  As a West Virginia beekeeper, small farmer, and founder of Unity Sisters Farms on the West Side of Charleston, I strongly support Senate Bill 927.This bill does not create unnecessary change. It strengthens and reinforces the structure that is already working under the West Virginia Department of Agriculture. It keeps oversight consistent at the state level and ensures science based regulation of apiaries across West Virginia.For me, beekeeping is not a hobby. It is part of how I educate families, support pollination for local gardens, and generate agricultural income within my community. I operate just feet away from a church and in close proximity to neighboring homes. My bees were inspected within days of establishing my hive, demonstrating that our current system is responsive and effective.Bees are essential to West Virginia agriculture. They pollinate apples, pumpkins, cucumbers, berries, tomatoes, and many other crops grown across our state. Healthy pollinator populations directly impact food production, farm sustainability, and local economies.Senate Bill 927 protects responsible beekeepers, supports farmers who depend on pollination, and maintains clear, consistent statewide authority. It builds on what we already have instead of creating confusion or fragmentation.West Virginia’s motto reminds us that Mountaineers are always free. Supporting responsible beekeeping allows residents the freedom to participate in agriculture, support their families, and strengthen their communities under clear and consistent state guidance. I respectfully urge the committee to advance Senate Bill 927.
2026 Regular Session HB5559 (Government Organization)
Comment by: April on March 3, 2026 11:20

Dear Members of the House,

I am writing in support of HB 5559.

As a West Virginia Licensed Independent Clinical Social Worker practicing in our state, and also a resident of West Virginia, I see firsthand the ongoing need to strengthen access to high-quality mental health care across our state. Legislation like HB 5559 represents an important step toward improving systems that directly impact West Virginians’ ability to receive timely, consistent, and effective services.

Our state continues to face provider shortages, geographic barriers, and increasing demand for behavioral health care. Policies that modernize and strengthen our infrastructure are critical to ensuring that individuals and families do not fall through the cracks. Many other states have already passed similar legislation, and if West Virginia fails to act, we risk falling behind in access, workforce development, and overall competitiveness in behavioral health care.

With the legislative session ending next week, I would sincerely appreciate seeing this bill make it to the floor for a vote rather than risking having to wait another year for progress on this issue.

Supporting HB 5559 signals that West Virginia is committed to improving access, supporting its workforce, and prioritizing the well-being of its residents. I respectfully urge you to vote in favor of this bill.

Thank you for your time and service to our state.

2026 Regular Session SB927 (Government Organization)
Comment by: Paxton Coby on March 3, 2026 11:13
I support SB 927 without amendments. Pollination supports West Virginia agriculture and farm income. Uniform statewide regulation protects investment and keeps agriculture predictable. Please pass SB 927 as written to protect our state’s agricultural economy.
2026 Regular Session HB5680 (Government Organization)
Comment by: Brian Powell on March 2, 2026 09:58
I oppose this bill because it is a lazy approach to addressing regulation. Regulations serve an important purpose in bringing the laws passed by the legislation into force.  Saying that every regulation needs to be re-justified from ground zero every handful number of years is a tremendous waste of state dollars. The reasoning behind and need for most regulations rarely changes. Further, saying that existing regulations have to be removed to pass new ones is insane. Either you need the regulation or you don't. Needing new regulations is not a reasonable ground for eliminating existing ones. It's the legislature's job to review regulations. Do your job and review the rules bundles before you. If you think there may be a need to revisit a particular issue in the future, include a sunset clause on that specific rule. Don't waste taxpayer money reevaluating every single rule because you're all too lazy to do the job you were elected to.
2026 Regular Session HB5601 (Government Organization)
Comment by: Mary Poke on February 27, 2026 12:23
I strongly support this bill for funding Disaster Case Management because many victims impacted by disasters, whether from flooding, severe storms or other catastrophic event are often in shocked and overwhelmed for days, months and years after the event has occurred.  Many fall through the cracks and never hear or understand there is available assistance even when it comes knocking at their door. They don’t physically or mentally hear there is help for them. Without this support, many vulnerable individuals, seniors, people with disabilities, low-income families, and those without internet access, fall through the cracks and think there is no help out there at their social level. Many don’t understand who FEMA is or what FEMA does. They have NO idea what to do or how to find help.  Long term recovery requires guidance, coordination and advocacy. Disaster Case Managers work one-on-one with survivors to assess unmet needs, develop recovery plans, and connect them to available resources such as housing repair assistance. In rural and hard-hit communities especially, many residents lack transportation, reliable communication, or the ability to navigate complex assistance systems on their own. Disaster Case Managers provide not just referrals, but hands-on assistance and advocacy that restores stability and DIGNITY. Disaster Case Management provides support for survivors who would otherwise be left behind.
2026 Regular Session HB5364 (Government Organization)
Comment by: National Organization for Rare Disorders on February 26, 2026 16:04
Proposal: West Virginia Rare Disease Expert Panel Proposed amendments to §9-5-15, §16-22-3, and §33-2-10 of the West Virginia Code — for inclusion in SB 894 / HB 5364   Prepared by: Carolyn G Sheridan, MPH, Associate Director of State Policy, National Organization for Rare Disorders Date: February 23, 2026 e: csheridan@rarediseases.org p: 203-241-0588     The National Organization for Rare Disorders (NORD) The National Organization for Rare Disorders is a nonprofit, patient-centered organization and the nation's leading rare disease advocacy organization. NORD has worked alongside state legislatures and agencies across 33 states to establish rare disease advisory infrastructure — providing model legislation, technical assistance, and ongoing policy support grounded in the lived experience of patients and the clinical expertise of the rare disease community.   The West Virgina Advisory Council on Rare Diseases West Virginia's Rare Disease Advisory Council sunset on June 30, 2025, and SB 894 / HB 5364 would complete its repeal. We see a path that honors the Legislature's efficiency goals while preserving what matters: access to expert and community input when it is needed most.   But eliminating the RDAC without a replacement leaves three consequential state programs — Medicaid drug utilization review, newborn screening, and insurance rulemaking — making high-stakes decisions that affect rare disease patients with no mechanism to access the specialized clinical expertise those decisions require.   NORD’s Proposal NORD respectfully submits the following draft language for inclusion in SB 894 / HB 5364. Rather than reauthorizing a standing council, this proposal creates a lean, on-demand expert consultation mechanism. Members are identified by the DHS commissioner and serve only when called. Three existing statutory programs gain access to specialized rare disease expertise at precisely the moments they need it.
  • Insert A: Amend §9-5-15 — Create the Expert Panel on Rare Diseases and Personalized Medicine within the Medicaid drug utilization review program
  • Insert B: Amend §16-22-3 — Give the Bureau for Public Health access to the panel for specified newborn screening decisions
  • Insert C: Amend §33-2-10 — Require the Insurance Commissioner to seek panel input before finalizing rules materially affecting rare disease access
  • Insert D: Transition provision — Dissolve the existing RDAC, transfer records, repeal §16-5CC
INSERT A   Add in the following at the end of West Virginia Code §9-5-15 (Medicaid program; preferred drug list and drug utilization review) To assist in carrying out the drug utilization review program established under this section, there is hereby created within the Department of Human Services an Expert Panel on Rare Diseases and Personalized Medicine.   The panel shall serve as an expert resource to the drug utilization review board, providing necessary consultation to the board when the board makes recommendations or determinations regarding beneficiary access to drugs or biological products for rare diseases, or when the board itself determines that it lacks the specific scientific, medical, or technical expertise necessary for the proper performance of its responsibilities and such necessary expertise can be provided by experts outside the board. “Beneficiary access”, as used in this section, shall mean developing prior authorization and reauthorization criteria for a rare disease drug, including placement on a preferred drug list or a formulary, as well as payment, cost-sharing, drug utilization review, or medication therapy management.   The panel shall consist of members identified by the commissioner, including physicians with experience treating rare diseases, medical researchers, a registered nurse or advanced practice registered nurse with rare disease experience, a pharmacist with orphan drug experience, a representative of the rare disease patient community, and such other members as the secretary deems necessary to provide adequate scientific and clinical expertise. Panel members shall serve when called without compensation.   The drug utilization review board, when making recommendations or determinations regarding beneficiary access to drugs and biological products for rare diseases, as defined in the federal Orphan Drug Act of 1983, P.L. 97-414, and drugs and biological products that are approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration and within the emerging fields of personalized medicine and noninheritable gene-editing therapeutics, shall request and consider information from the panel. The commissioner shall seek input from the panel on the following topics when relevant to a drug utilization review determination: (1) The nature and severity of the rare disease under consideration; (2) The unmet medical need associated with the rare disease; (3) The impact of prior authorization, cost-sharing, tiering, step therapy, or other utilization management procedures on patient access to and adherence to rare disease therapies; (4) Whether Medicaid beneficiaries requiring treatment from a rare disease specialist have adequate access, and if not, what factors are causing the limitation; and (5) The demographics and clinical description of the relevant patient population.   Recommendations of the panel shall be presented in writing to the commissioner and explained during relevant public proceedings. Nothing in this section shall require the commissioner or the drug utilization review program to follow the recommendations of the panel, nor shall this section be construed to create a legal right to consultation on any matter.         INSERT B  
  • 16-22-3 — Newborn Screening Insertion. In subsection (d), after the existing language directing the Bureau for Public Health to propose legislative rules, add a new subsection (e):
(e) The Bureau for Public Health shall consult the West Virginia Rare Disease Expert Panel established under §9-5-15 of this code when: (1) Proposing rules under subsection (d) of this section related to the modification, or removal of any disease or condition from the newborn screening panel; (2) Evaluating the medical, dietary, and related assistance programs available to children determined to be afflicted with a disease specified under subsection (a) of this section; and (3) Assessing any unmet needs in the diagnosis, treatment, or follow-up care of children identified through newborn screening in this state.   The Bureau shall provide the panel with sufficient notice and relevant materials to allow meaningful input prior to any rulemaking action under this section. Nothing in this subsection shall be construed to require the Bureau to adopt the recommendations of the panel or to delay any rulemaking action pending panel review.   INSERT C   State Regulated Insurance insertion. In §33-2-10 (Rules and regulations), add the following new subsection (d): (d) Orphan Drug Consultation When promulgating rules or issuing formal guidance under this section where the commissioner has reason to believe the rule or guidance may materially affect access to care, coverage, treatment, or services for individuals diagnosed with a rare disease, as defined in the federal Orphan Drug Act of 1983, 21 U.S.C. §§ 360aa et seq., the commissioner shall seek written input from the Expert Panel on Rare Diseases and Personalized Medicine established under §9-5-15 of this code prior to finalizing any such rule or guidance. For purposes of this subsection, rules or guidance that may materially affect individuals with rare diseases include, but are not limited to, rules or guidance relating to: (A) Health benefit plan network adequacy standards; (B) Prior authorization requirements or standards; (C) Step therapy or fail-first protocols; (D) Prescription drug formulary design or tier placement requirements; and (E) Utilization management standards applicable to specialty drugs or biologics.   (2) Input from the panel shall be provided in writing and made part of the public rulemaking record prior to finalization of the rule or guidance.   (4) Nothing in this subsection shall be construed to require the commissioner to adopt any recommendation of the panel, to delay finalization of any rule or guidance beyond a reasonable comment period established by the commissioner, or to create a legal right to consultation on any matter.         INSERT D   Transition provisions for the dissolution of the West Virginia RDAC. Include as a standalone § of enacting legislation Upon the effective date of this act, the Expert Panel on Rare Diseases and Personalized Medicine established pursuant to the amendments to §9-5-15 of this code made by this act shall supersede the West Virginia Advisory Council on Rare Diseases established under article five-cc, chapter sixteen of this code.   All records, reports, findings, and pending work products of the Advisory Council on Rare Diseases shall be transferred to the Department of Human Services for use by the Expert Panel on Rare Diseases and Personalized Medicine. Individuals who served on the Advisory Council on Rare Diseases shall be eligible to be identified by the commissioner for service on the panel pursuant to §9-5-15 of this code.
2026 Regular Session HB5441 (Government Organization)
Comment by: Mary Jane on February 25, 2026 19:56
Are we just going to move them back out in a few years when the administration changes? Committee, I urge you to instead request a legislative audit and revisit next year. Your hardworking state employees deserve at minimum data supported and researched based decisions. A simple Google search shows that Texas and other states do have decentralized or regional systems. If we want to backyard brawl, we should probably improve not digress.
2026 Regular Session HB5439 (Government Organization)
Comment by: Peggy Bowers on February 24, 2026 10:22
I think this bill touches on a very important topic but does not go far enough in actually helping pollinators. Our pollinators are in serious trouble with decline across many species. As of 2020 there were over 70 species listed as critically endangered. Habitat loss is one important reason and the key to reversing that is to increase the use and cultivation of native plants. Pollinator friendly plantings need to be native plants. More information is available at https://www.fws.gov/initiative/pollinators/threats
2026 Regular Session HB5439 (Government Organization)
Comment by: Carolyn Thomas on February 23, 2026 18:17
This is an important bill - pollinators of all kinds  (birds, insects, and bats) are in decline. Please strengthen the bill by calling for the use of native plants in (B) and (C)
  • Encourages the planting of NATIVE e pollinator-friendly habitats on private property; (C) Creates a strategy for the planting of NATIVE  pollinator-friendly habitats in state parks and state forests;
  • Provide funding sources to establish native pollinator habitats in state parks and state forests
2026 Regular Session HB5601 (Government Organization)
Comment by: Taylor Adams on February 23, 2026 09:36
Disaster Case Management is crucial to the success of long-term recovery:  
- They work with households to develop a  ‘recovery plan’
- They access direct financial assistance for housing, repairs, and essential needs
- They access volunteer teams and donated materials for recovery plans
- They assist with appeal FEMA decision appeals, often unlocking thousands of dollars per household
- They navigate complex recovery systems that are otherwise overwhelming
- Assist families with moving  from crisis to long-term stability and recovery
2026 Regular Session HB5601 (Government Organization)
Comment by: Melissa Burch on February 22, 2026 03:43
Clearly, WV needs more resources. If we had it the right way, we would have built infrastructure to prevent the flooding in the first place. Being where we are, there are many folks still currently displaced by last years flooding in the Valley Grove area. Why are we still “surprised” that homelessness is on the rise? Where’s all the opioid funds going? A part of preventing drug abuse is making sure ppl have support when they loose their housing. Please pass and support HB 5601. WV needs it. Thank you.
2026 Regular Session HB5680 (Government Organization)
Comment by: Jayli Flynn on February 20, 2026 21:23
I respectfully oppose HB 5680 because, while framed as regulatory reform, it creates structural risks to constitutional governance, federal compliance, and public protection in West Virginia. 1️⃣ Automatic Expiration of Rules Creates Regulatory Instability HB 5680 requires all agency rules to automatically expire unless re-justified and renewed within strict timelines. Administrative rules are not arbitrary — they implement laws already passed by the Legislature. Automatic expiration risks:
  • Interrupting enforcement of environmental, public health, occupational safety, and licensing protections
  • Creating regulatory gaps if agencies lack resources to complete zero-based reviews in time
  • Increasing litigation exposure when protections lapse
A system that allows core public safeguards to disappear by default does not strengthen accountability — it introduces instability into statutory enforcement. 2️⃣ Risk of Conflict with Federal Law and Funding Requirements Many West Virginia regulations exist to comply with federal mandates, including:
  • Clean Water Act requirements
  • Safe Drinking Water Act standards
  • OSHA occupational safety standards
  • Medicaid and public health compliance frameworks
If rules expire due to sunset deadlines or burden caps, the state may:
  • Fall out of federal compliance
  • Jeopardize federal funding streams
  • Trigger federal preemption challenges
Federal supremacy under Article VI of the U.S. Constitution means state regulatory structures cannot obstruct federally mandated programs. HB 5680 does not provide clear safeguards preventing those conflicts. 3️⃣ Separation of Powers Concerns – Judicial Deference Provision The bill directs courts not to defer to agencies and to resolve ambiguities in favor of repeal. While legislatures may define statutory interpretation standards, they may not impair judicial independence under Article V of the West Virginia Constitution. Mandating outcome-tilted interpretation standards risks:
  • Interference with judicial discretion
  • Increased constitutional litigation
  • Prolonged legal uncertainty around rule enforcement
Courts determine constitutional and statutory meaning — not the Legislature. 4️⃣ Regulatory Burden Caps May Obstruct Statutory Duties HB 5680 imposes regulatory “burden caps,” requiring agencies to offset new rules by eliminating existing burdens. This creates structural tension where:
  • Agencies are legally obligated to implement statutes
  • But may be prevented from doing so due to artificial burden ceilings
If an agency is required by law to protect public health or enforce environmental standards, it cannot be constrained by a numeric burden quota. This could expose the state to mandamus actions or enforcement challenges. 5️⃣ Administrative Overload and Cost Increase Zero-based review of every rule within staggered sunset windows will require:
  • Significant agency staffing
  • Economic analysis
  • Legal review
  • Public notice procedures
Instead of reducing government cost, this may increase administrative expense while diverting staff from enforcement duties. There is no clear fiscal safeguard demonstrating this will reduce costs. 6️⃣ Increased Litigation Risk The bill creates new standing provisions allowing individuals to challenge enforcement tied to sunset compliance. Combined with automatic expiration and anti-deference standards, this invites:
  • Expanded judicial challenges
  • Injunctions against agencies
  • Legal delays in rule enforcement
Rather than simplifying governance, HB 5680 may entrench West Virginia in continuous regulatory litigation. Conclusion Accountability and transparency are important goals. However, HB 5680 replaces structured rulemaking oversight with automatic expiration, burden quotas, and constrained judicial interpretation. The likely outcomes include:
  • Regulatory instability
  • Federal compliance risk
  • Increased litigation
  • Administrative strain
  • Potential constitutional challenge
Reform should strengthen transparency without destabilizing statutory enforcement. For these reasons, I respectfully urge opposition to HB 5680 in its current form.
2026 Regular Session HB5601 (Government Organization)
Comment by: Gina Namay on February 20, 2026 18:30
Funding disaster case managers is crucial for West Virginia residents who are impacted by disaster - helps them to navigate the complex disaster recovery system. Helps residents to make a recovery plan, apply for FEMA funding, appeal FEMA denials, if needed, access disaster recovery resources (governmental, private, and non-profit), and much more. Please make this a priority and pass this critical legislation that will help WV communities become more resilient in times of disaster. Thank you
2026 Regular Session HB5601 (Government Organization)
Comment by: Vanessa VanGilder on February 20, 2026 16:27

Disaster Case Management is crucial to the success of long-term recovery:

- They work with households to develop a  ‘recovery plan’
- They access direct financial assistance for housing, repairs, and essential needs
- They access volunteer teams and donated materials for recovery plans
- They assist with appeal FEMA decision appeals, often unlocking thousands of dollars per household
- They navigate complex recovery systems that are otherwise overwhelming
- Assist families with moving  from crisis to long-term stability and recovery
2026 Regular Session HB5601 (Government Organization)
Comment by: James A McCune on February 20, 2026 13:27
The United Methodist Church spends thousands of dollars annually to assist persons affected by disasters.   Flooding, straight winds and other issues arise every year.  In order to have a clear sense of the needs of individuals and responsibly care for their needs we need and must have funding for case management.  We seek a partnership with the state of WV even as we partner with WV VOAD.    Please pass this bill to establish funding that in many ways is a relative bargain to ensure the caring of our citizens following disasters.
2026 Regular Session HB5601 (Government Organization)
Comment by: Vicki Johnson on February 20, 2026 13:10
I support

HB 5601

2026 Regular Session HB5645 (Government Organization)
Comment by: Jack Morrison on February 20, 2026 11:02
I am writing to express concerns about HB5645 from a pro-work, pro-taxpayer, and pro-West Virginian perspective. Conservatives believe in personal responsibility, strong families, and efficient government. We also believe public policy should be practical, fair, and designed to help people succeed - not create unnecessary barriers. While the stated goal of this bill is to promote work and program integrity, several provisions risk doing the opposite. The proposal requires extensive documentation, repeated eligibility verification, and frequent redeterminations that could cause eligible working individuals to lose benefits simply because of paperwork delays or reporting technicalities. Policies that unintentionally penalize people who are already working or trying to find work do not strengthen our workforce-they weaken it. Additionally, the bill mandates extensive cross-agency data checks and reporting systems that could significantly increase administrative costs. Fiscal responsibility requires us to ensure that new regulations actually save taxpayer dollars rather than expanding bureaucracy. Government should be lean and targeted, not layered and redundant. The legislation also limits administrative flexibility unless the Legislature approves each adjustment. This could prevent timely responses to layoffs, regional economic downturns, or emergencies that affect employment. A conservative governing philosophy supports local responsiveness and practical discretion, not rigid one-size-fits-all mandates. Importantly, most West Virginians who rely on temporary assistance are already working, caring for family members, or facing short-term hardship. Policies should help them transition into stable employment, not risk cutting off health coverage or food support during vulnerable periods that make it harder to stay employed. I respectfully urge lawmakers, including Delegate Burkhammer and colleagues, to reconsider this bill and instead pursue reforms that:
  • strengthen workforce pathways and job placement • target fraud with precision rather than broad administrative burdens • protect taxpayers while supporting workers • maintain flexibility to respond to local economic realities in West Virginia
West Virginians deserve policy that is tough, smart, and effective, not just strict on paper. The best conservative solutions are those that uphold accountability while empowering people to work, provide for their families, and contribute to our state’s future.
2026 Regular Session HB5531 (Government Organization)
Comment by: Brooke Duff on February 19, 2026 20:51
I respectfully express my support for this bill. The allowance of handler dispatch will enhance safety for those engaged in tracking by eliminating the need for a hunter to closely accompany handlers with a bow, crossbow, or firearm. Reducing the number of individuals actively carrying weapons in these situations helps minimize potential risks and promotes a safer working environment. Furthermore, handler dispatch represents a more humane approach to wildlife recovery. It allows for a timely and efficient conclusion, thereby reducing unnecessary suffering. For reasons of both public safety and ethical wildlife management, I believe this legislation is a responsible and appropriate measure.
2026 Regular Session HB5600 (Government Organization)
Comment by: Michael Shane Gore on February 19, 2026 19:34
Disgusting that you all are doing this now. First we had to jump through hoops for existing private school christian students. Now talk of not allowing special needs students to have the scholarship. My son has functional autism and was left in the back of the class playing games instead of being taught in public school. Now in a Christian Academy he has blossomed. Beyond mad
2026 Regular Session HB5531 (Government Organization)
Comment by: Don on February 19, 2026 18:31
I think this bill needs to pass for the safety of the trackers and the dog. And to dispatch the game animal if need be. Don't need the hunter with a bow or cross bow or gun around the trackers or dog. Makes for a safer environment for everyone.
2026 Regular Session HB5601 (Government Organization)
Comment by: Christy chapman on February 19, 2026 18:23
I strongly support this bill
2026 Regular Session HB5601 (Government Organization)
Comment by: Jason DeCou on February 19, 2026 16:31
I wholeheartedly support this bill and hope that you will to as my representative in this democracy.
2026 Regular Session HB5601 (Government Organization)
Comment by: Mary Ellen on February 19, 2026 16:17
There are still many folks in the southern part of the state who are working on their recovery and could use the assistance which this bill would provide.  Thank you Delegate Green for drafting this bill, and to all delegates for your careful consideration.
2026 Regular Session HB5601 (Government Organization)
Comment by: Jonah Kone on February 19, 2026 16:02
As a resident of Mercer county I strongoy support this bill!