Skip to content Skip to main navigation Skip to footer
West Virginia Legislature

87th Legislature

Public Comments

2026 Regular Session HB4712 (Judiciary)
Comment by: Tiffany on February 14, 2026 08:06
This law needs passed to ensure the safety of our citizens and community. Destany's sentencing was a slap on the wrist while Baylea's family will suffer the rest of their lives. Destany's sentence was a disgrace to our community and disrespectful to Baylea's name. She did not deserve to die due to someone else's negligence. This a law needs passed to prevent this from happening again. We should not let Baylea die in vain.
2026 Regular Session HB4712 (Judiciary)
Comment by: Melissa Prichard on February 14, 2026 07:20
Please pass house bill 4712. It’s time we hold people accountable.  In 2016, my 11 year old daughter and I were hit head on by a drunk driver when leaving my brother’s wedding rehearsal.  Thankfully, we both walked away with our lives still intact.  This was not the drunk drivers first offense, yet, he was given a smack on the hand and was back out on the road within a week.  Our whole lives almost changed in an instant.  Drunk driving has affected so many families not just Baylea’s.  If we have stricter laws, maybe, just maybe, people would stop and think a little harder before they step into a vehicle while intoxicated. Let protect innocent lives.  Thank you!
2026 Regular Session HB5465 (Judiciary)
Comment by: Cristy Anderson on February 14, 2026 03:23
I support this bill. This is no different than alternate paths to teaching or other careers.  This bill would simply allow someone to sit for the bar exam if he or she possesses a graduate degree.  If someone has the knowledge to pass the exam, why prohibit this?
2026 Regular Session SB84 (Judiciary)
Comment by: marquele barnes on February 13, 2026 23:51
I do like this bill but what if they the law has good information on a crime being done on private property.
2026 Regular Session HB4712 (Judiciary)
Comment by: Julie Seagraves on February 13, 2026 22:59
There needs to be tougher penalties for taking a life.  The minimum penalty definitely deserves to be longer, and actually enforced.
2026 Regular Session HB4712 (Judiciary)
Comment by: Jessica on February 13, 2026 22:46
To pass Baylea's law! Because she didnt deserve what had happened to her! Especially with the trial atleast give her some justice! The family and friends are so devastated because her life was taken that day! And even more when the defendant basically gotten off scott free with 6 to 12 months of house arrest and in a program!
2026 Regular Session HB4712 (Judiciary)
Comment by: Wayne G Long on February 13, 2026 22:25
This bill is needed to impose stricter penalties for people getting behind the wheel under the influence of alcohol and/or drugs not only risking their lives and others as well. Please pass the bill 🙏 🙏 🙏 
2026 Regular Session HB4712 (Judiciary)
Comment by: Trais on February 13, 2026 22:16
I fully support this law being passed. When someone chooses to drive drunk and takes a life, it’s not just a mistake, it’s a decision with irreversible consequences. Families are left grieving forever, while the person responsible often faces far less than the lifetime sentence the victims’ loved ones endure. Increasing penalties sends a clear message that these choices will have serious consequences. We must hold offenders fully accountable.
2026 Regular Session HB4712 (Judiciary)
Comment by: Lana Cook on February 13, 2026 21:47
Please pass this bill
2026 Regular Session HB4712 (Judiciary)
Comment by: Bradley Brown on February 13, 2026 21:20
I, Bradley L. Brown, do agree with the following newly requested law by the Craig Family. Upon this law, it shall make people consider making such a decision as to where peoples lives can be jeopardized and/or resulted into a serious life altering injury. Enforcing a more strict law, with more consequences to a reckless decision of an individual that is impaired by any substance which will cause the mind to be altered/affected enough to not allow the person to operate any Vehicle/Machinery without being aware of any dangerous potential of injury, or have the ability to have control of any emergency situation. This request is absolutely valid, and should be recognized by authorities!
2026 Regular Session HB4712 (Judiciary)
Comment by: Alyssa Lail on February 13, 2026 20:46
Driving under the influence is a choice. When that choice results in someone’s death, the consequences should reflect the true severity of that loss. No family should have to bury a loved one because of a preventable decision. The pain and lifelong impact on victims’ families cannot be measured, and it far outweighs a lenient sentence. Increasing the penalty for DUI causing death honors the value of the life taken and reinforces that these tragedies demand real accountability and justice.
2026 Regular Session HB4712 (Judiciary)
Comment by: Sandi Barnett on February 13, 2026 20:06
This bill definitely needs to happen...#justiceforbaylea
2026 Regular Session HB4712 (Judiciary)
Comment by: Allison Boling on February 13, 2026 19:31
Protecting West Virginian citizens should be a priority, but with the recent judge ruling regarding Baylea Bower has set a precedent amongst residents. West Virginians are losing faith for the state’s judicial system. DUIs are a serious matter, especially when individuals are left seriously injured or worse. Light sentences do nothing to prevent DUI crashes - harsher jail time and raised fines are a perfectly reasonable deterrent. Yes, mistakes do happen, but mistakes have consequences. That’s why I implore our states House and Senate to consider this bill. Protect West Virginians and prevent other families from enduring what the Bower family is currently enduring. They are left grieving a young woman who should still be alive, and the woman who did this received a light sentencing. It’s not right nor is it acceptable. Things need to change or more innocent lives will continue to be ruined.
2026 Regular Session HB5528 (Judiciary)
Comment by: Jayli Flynn on February 13, 2026 19:15
I oppose HB 5528 because it creates new, special legal protections for law-enforcement and certain officials without first demonstrating that West Virginia has achieved baseline transparency, accountability, and effective discipline in policing—and because West Virginia already has an existing address-protection framework in law. 1) HB 5528 expands special protections for a class of officials, while public accountability remains weak HB 5528 would add §61-2-31 to prohibit government entities from knowingly disclosing a “covered individual’s” home street address and certain phone numbers on publicly accessible records, and it creates a civil remedy (injunction, actual damages, and attorney fees/costs).  Public safety matters. But policy must also reflect public accountability—especially when the state is adding more “special rules” for law-enforcement. 2) West Virginia already has Daniel’s Law protecting this information West Virginia already has Daniel’s Law (W. Va. Code §5A-8-24) protecting personal information for judicial officers, prosecutors, and law-enforcement officers (with civil enforcement provisions).  If the Legislature believes current protections are not being implemented consistently, the solution should be compliance and enforcement of existing law—plus transparent reporting—rather than layering a second, overlapping statute that may create confusion across agencies and databases. (HB 5528 is also unusually narrow for judges/prosecutors by focusing on “retired” categories in its definition of “covered individual.”)  3) WV data shows a serious accountability gap: many force/misconduct incidents, relatively few disciplinary actions The ACLU of West Virginia’s 2020 Police Misconduct Report (built from WV FOIA requests) reports:
  • Use-of-force incidents (92 agencies reporting): 665 (2015), 738 (2016), 723 (2017), 899 (2018), 966 (2019)  
  • Formal complaints of misconduct (91 agencies reporting): 204 (2015), 173 (2016), 198 (2017), 134 (2018), 152 (2019)  
  • Only 47% of complaints resulted in a review  
  • Total disciplinary actions (2015–2019): 243  
  • The report highlights a stark ratio: “16 times as many use-of-force incidents as disciplinary actions.”  
  • It also reports that the WV State Police had more misconduct complaints than all other responding agencies combined in 2015 and 2016.  
These are not “anti-police” talking points—this is WV data collected through open records. When discipline is this comparatively rare, it is not responsible to keep adding new legal shields for law enforcement without pairing them with enforceable public protections and oversight. 4) WV has had recent, documented law-enforcement scandals and confirmed wrongdoing Recent reporting on the West Virginia State Police scandal describes allegations ranging from purchasing-rule circumvention (“ghost accounts”) to misuse of purchasing cards, overtime abuse, and other misconduct—along with confirmed allegations including theft by troopers from an individual at Mardi Gras Casino (2021).  Separately, reporting shows a former Wheeling police officer / drug task force commander pleaded guilty to stealing more than $75,000 from task force funds (federal-program theft charge), including a stated total of $75,124.44.  And federal cases show that West Virginia law-enforcement officers have faced federal civil-rights and excessive-force charges/sentences (examples include DOJ announcements of indictments and sentencing in WV).  Given this context, expanding special protections for law enforcement—without expanding independent oversight—moves WV in the wrong direction. 5) Equity problem: more protections for the state, fewer for residents HB 5528 is a one-way policy: it increases legal protections for a defined group of officials, while ordinary West Virginians who face profiling, harassment, retaliation, or revenue-driven enforcement do not receive parallel safeguards (such as consistent, independent complaint review; transparent discipline reporting; limits on secrecy; or meaningful remedies when harmed). When the public is asked to accept reduced transparency in the name of “safety,” the Legislature should also provide public safety from abuse of power through strong accountability systems. What I’m asking the Legislature to do
  1. Vote NO on HB 5528 as drafted.  
  2. If the bill is considered at all, amend it to include public accountability requirements, such as:
  • Mandatory annual reporting by agencies on: number of redaction requests granted/denied, databases impacted, and response times (so “privacy” doesn’t become an untracked secrecy tool).
  • A requirement that agencies publish discipline and complaint outcomes in aggregate (no personal addresses needed) so residents can see whether misconduct is being addressed.
  • A parallel pathway for ordinary residents facing credible threats (e.g., stalking/domestic violence survivors) to request similar removal of home addresses from public-facing databases—so this isn’t an “officials-only” protection.
West Virginia already has Daniel’s Law. The problem is not the lack of statutes—it’s the lack of consistent transparency and accountability. 
2026 Regular Session HB4712 (Judiciary)
Comment by: Jenna Ford on February 13, 2026 19:09
Baylea was a wonderful person . A person who would do anything for anyone. She tragically lost her life due to the ignorance of a dunk and high adult who had got away with a slap on the wrist. Baylea and her family did not get justice but we will continue to speak her name. Please pass this bill to insure harsher consequences to individuals who choose to make poor choices that take someone else’s life.
2026 Regular Session HB5520 (Judiciary)
Comment by: Jayli Flynn on February 13, 2026 19:05
I respectfully submit this comment in opposition to HB 5520. HB 5520 creates a “Foreign Adversary Contracting Prohibition Act,” a “Foreign Adversary and Terrorist Agent Registration Act,” and a “Transnational Repression Act” within West Virginia Code. While framed as a state procurement and ethics measure, the bill imports national-security terminology traditionally governed at the federal level. Under the U.S. Constitution, foreign affairs authority is vested primarily in the federal government (Article I, Section 8; Article II; Supremacy Clause, Article VI). The U.S. Supreme Court has held that states may not intrude into foreign policy in ways that conflict with federal authority (Zschernig v. Miller, 389 U.S. 429 (1968)). Federal agencies such as the U.S. Department of Treasury (OFAC), the U.S. Department of Commerce, and the U.S. Department of Justice already regulate sanctions, export controls, and foreign agent registration at the national level. HB 5520 risks duplicating or overlapping with existing federal enforcement systems. When states create parallel foreign-adversary registries or prohibitions, they risk:
  1. Federal preemption challenges if state enforcement conflicts with federal determinations.
  2. Vagueness concerns if definitions of “foreign adversary” or “foreign agent” are not tightly aligned with federal law.
  3. Compliance burdens on local businesses, universities, and contractors who already must comply with federal sanctions and disclosure rules.
Additionally, procurement restrictions must be applied carefully to avoid Equal Protection concerns under the Fourteenth Amendment. Any law referencing “foreign adversaries” must clearly distinguish between foreign governments or sanctioned entities and individuals of particular national origin. State law must avoid even the appearance of nationality-based discrimination. Beyond constitutional considerations, there is also a question of legislative prioritization. West Virginia faces pressing state-level issues including infrastructure, public health, water quality, workforce development, and economic opportunity. Federal agencies already manage national security determinations and foreign sanctions enforcement. Expanding state code into areas closely tied to federal geopolitical disputes may not be the most effective use of limited session time and taxpayer resources. If the Legislature wishes to address procurement transparency, it could do so by:
  • Explicitly incorporating federal sanctions lists rather than creating independent state determinations.
  • Narrowly tailoring definitions to align directly with federal designations.
  • Including clear anti-discrimination safeguards.
For these reasons, I urge careful reconsideration or amendment of HB 5520 to ensure it remains within traditional state authority, avoids constitutional ambiguity, and prioritizes core state governance responsibilities.
2026 Regular Session HB5423 (Judiciary)
Comment by: Brian Powell on February 13, 2026 18:52
Shame on Del. Funkhouser and co-sponsors of this bill for hiding changes to remove high school and college IDs in this unrelated bill. Aside from that, barring recognition of drivers licenses issues by other states without a public safety reason is bad policy. A person's immigration status has no bearing on their ability to operate a motor vehicle. In the event there were to be a collision involving an undocumented immigrant, this bill would just make it harder for any other person involved (including West Virginians) to pursue claims. This is a bad bill. Vote it down.
2026 Regular Session HB5507 (Judiciary)
Comment by: Jayli Flynn on February 13, 2026 18:48
I respectfully oppose HB 5507 for the following factual and structural reasons: 1️⃣ An Article V Convention Is Constitutionally Uncharted Territory Article V of the U.S. Constitution provides for a convention called by two-thirds of the states (34), but:
  • No Article V convention has ever occurred in U.S. history.
  • There are no judicial precedents defining:
    • How delegates are apportioned
    • Whether a convention can be limited by topic
    • Whether states can legally bind or recall delegates mid-convention
  • The U.S. Supreme Court has never ruled on enforcement mechanisms for delegate restrictions.
HB 5507 assumes enforceability of delegate limits that have never been tested in federal court. 2️⃣ Delegate “Limits” May Not Be Legally Binding While HB 5507 attempts to restrict delegate authority through commissioning resolutions and recall provisions:
  • Article V itself does not provide a state enforcement mechanism once a convention convenes.
  • Constitutional scholars disagree on whether delegates could exceed their instructions.
  • If a delegate voted beyond their instructions, enforcement would likely require federal judicial review — an uncertain and potentially delayed process.
This creates legal ambiguity and risk. 3️⃣ One-State-One-Vote Structure Creates Disproportionate Influence Historically, interstate conventions operate under a one-state-one-vote model. That means:
  • West Virginia (1.7 million people) would have equal voting power to California (39 million).
  • Amendments could be proposed by a coalition of 26 states representing a minority of the U.S. population.
This raises structural concerns about democratic proportionality. 4️⃣ Proposal Threshold vs. Ratification Threshold While ratification requires 38 states (3/4), only 26 states could propose amendments at the convention stage. This means:
  • A simple majority of states could introduce sweeping constitutional changes.
  • Political momentum and national pressure could influence ratification outcomes.
The proposal stage itself carries significant political weight. 5️⃣ Fiscal Considerations HB 5507 establishes:
  • Delegate compensation
  • Administrative oversight
  • Advisory committee functions
The bill creates a new statutory framework without clarity on long-term fiscal exposure if a convention occurs. 6️⃣ No Immediate Necessity Congress already retains authority to propose constitutional amendments under Article V with a two-thirds vote. An Article V convention is not required for constitutional reform. Establishing a statutory framework for an unprecedented constitutional process increases institutional risk without demonstrated necessity. Conclusion HB 5507 normalizes participation in an unprecedented and legally unsettled constitutional process. Given:
  • The absence of judicial clarity,
  • The inability to guarantee enforceable delegate limits,
  • Structural concerns regarding representation,
  • And potential fiscal implications,
This bill should not advance without:
  • Clear constitutional safeguards,
  • Transparent fiscal impact analysis,
  • And broader public deliberation.
For these reasons, I respectfully urge opposition to HB 5507.
2026 Regular Session HB4712 (Judiciary)
Comment by: Rachel Belcher on February 13, 2026 17:58
Please pass this law. R.I.P  Baylea Bower
2026 Regular Session SB704 (Judiciary)
Comment by: Steven Wendelin on February 13, 2026 17:34

I strongly support Senate Bill 704, the Veterans’ Empowerment and Trust Safeguard Act. Our veterans deserve honest guidance when navigating the VA system, not high-pressure sales tactics or excessive fees. For generations, accredited Veterans Service Organizations like the VFW, American Legion, and DAV have provided claims assistance free of charge because their mission is service, not profit. When companies step in and charge large sums for the same work, it opens the door to abuse and undermines the trust our veterans place in the system.

On a personal note, I received outstanding support from a VFW Veterans Service Officer during my own VA process. The professionalism, integrity, and no-cost assistance made a real difference, and it is exactly the kind of veteran-to-veteran service we should be strengthening, not replacing. This legislation helps ensure that accredited representatives remain the gold standard while protecting veterans and their families from predatory practices. It is a practical, pro-veteran measure that reinforces accountability, transparency, and respect for those who served.
2026 Regular Session HB4712 (Judiciary)
Comment by: Emily Howerton on February 13, 2026 17:02
This bill will save so many lives and will make people more accountable.
2026 Regular Session HB5479 (Judiciary)
Comment by: Jody Mohr on February 13, 2026 17:00
I urge you to support this bill. It is a common sense approach that will increase public safety by identifying legitimate law enforcement to the public.
2026 Regular Session HB4712 (Judiciary)
Comment by: Christina Suttle on February 13, 2026 16:52
to whom it may concern I believe that this bill should carry a higher sentence no parent or family should have to burry their kid due to a drunk driver. There is so many people out here with dui’s on their records or that’s out drinking and driving and not being stopped or held accountable for their actions they go in and they are out same day or next day. Or they don’t serve anytime. It’s time for us as a state to stop the drunk drivers before someone else is killed.
2026 Regular Session HB4712 (Judiciary)
Comment by: Miriam Adkins on February 13, 2026 16:34
Justice for Baylea Bower, Destiny Lester deserves jail time! There’s proof where she has no care in the world and flaunted how she’d get drunk WHILE BEING UNDERAGE and the judge think that’s cute, all he cares about is the money.
2026 Regular Session HB4712 (Judiciary)
Comment by: Michele Cook on February 13, 2026 16:20
Please pass House Bill 4712
2026 Regular Session HB4712 (Judiciary)
Comment by: Donna Farruggia on February 13, 2026 16:11
Please pass this bill and protect others that’s in the situation…
2026 Regular Session HB5471 (Judiciary)
Comment by: Jayli Flynn on February 13, 2026 15:41
I respectfully oppose HB 5471 in its current form. HB 5471 proposes increasing salaries for magistrates, circuit court judges, family court judges, intermediate court judges, and Supreme Court justices beginning July 1, 2026. According to the bill text, this includes raising magistrate salaries to $75,880 and Supreme Court justices to $154,600, with corresponding increases for other judicial positions. While judicial independence and competitive compensation are important, this proposal must be evaluated in the context of West Virginia’s broader fiscal realities. West Virginia consistently ranks near the bottom nationally in median household income (approximately mid-$50,000 range according to recent U.S. Census data). Many state employees, teachers, first responders, and public health workers earn significantly less than the salaries proposed in this bill. Additionally, the state continues to debate reductions in revenue streams, including income tax cuts, while facing ongoing obligations related to infrastructure, public health, education, and pension liabilities. Increasing judicial salaries creates a permanent recurring budget obligation. Salary increases also raise long-term pension liabilities because judicial retirement benefits are tied to compensation levels. This has actuarial and fiscal impacts beyond the immediate pay increase. Before approving salary increases at this level, the Legislature should:
  1. Provide a published fiscal note detailing the total long-term cost, including pension impacts.
  2. Demonstrate that the Judges’ Retirement System is fully funded or on a stable actuarial path.
  3. Compare proposed judicial salary levels to surrounding states using objective cost-of-living and caseload metrics.
  4. Address workforce shortages in lower-paid public sectors before increasing upper-tier compensation.
West Virginia taxpayers deserve transparency regarding long-term financial commitments. In a state with persistent economic challenges, salary increases at the highest levels of government must be justified with clear data showing recruitment problems, retention crises, or constitutional necessity. Absent that evidence, HB 5471 prioritizes high-level salary growth over broader fiscal stability and workforce equity. For these reasons, I urge careful reconsideration or amendment of this bill
2026 Regular Session HB4712 (Judiciary)
Comment by: Tori Bell on February 13, 2026 15:36

No one should be able to make the decision to get behind a wheel impaired and not have to answer for their consequences. Especially when it causes the death of another person. justice should be served.

2026 Regular Session HB4712 (Judiciary)
Comment by: Amber Wilkinson on February 13, 2026 15:32
Many people I know have lost loved ones at the extent of an intoxicated driver. Justice deserves to be served!
2026 Regular Session HB5465 (Judiciary)
Comment by: Jayli Flynn on February 13, 2026 15:30
I respectfully oppose House Bill 5465. HB 5465 would amend West Virginia Code §30-2-1 to permit any individual holding a master’s degree — regardless of the field of study — to sit for the West Virginia Bar Examination. This proposal raises significant concerns regarding both professional standards and equitable access within our state. 1. West Virginia Has Low Graduate Degree Attainment According to U.S. Census Bureau data compiled by the Federal Reserve Economic Data (FRED), approximately 9.6% of West Virginians age 25 and older hold a graduate or professional degree. That means fewer than 1 in 10 adults in the state possess the credential this bill would require. West Virginia also ranks among the lowest states nationally in overall higher education attainment. Approximately 19–20% of adults hold a bachelor’s degree or higher, well below the national average. Conditioning bar exam eligibility on possession of a master’s degree does not expand access for most West Virginians. Instead, it ties eligibility to a credential held by a small minority of the population — many of whom already have substantial financial and geographic access to higher education. In rural counties especially, access to graduate programs is limited, and pursuing a master’s degree often requires relocation and significant debt. If the goal is to address attorney shortages or expand opportunity, this bill does not meaningfully address structural barriers to legal education in West Virginia. 2. Master’s Degrees Do Not Ensure Legal Training Under current West Virginia Rules for Admission to the Practice of Law, applicants must graduate from an approved law school (J.D. or equivalent) before sitting for the bar exam. Law school provides structured instruction in:
  • Constitutional law
  • Civil procedure
  • Criminal law
  • Contracts and torts
  • Evidence
  • Legal research and writing
  • Professional responsibility and ethics
A general master’s degree — whether in business, biology, education, engineering, or another field — does not provide this legal training. The bar examination is designed to test legal knowledge; it is not designed to substitute for formal legal education. Eliminating the legal education prerequisite without replacing it with a defined law-specific training pathway removes a long-standing safeguard intended to ensure baseline professional competency before licensure. 3. Public Protection Considerations Attorney licensure standards exist to protect the public. Lawyers handle matters involving constitutional rights, criminal defense, property, contracts, family law, and access to the courts. Lowering educational prerequisites without implementing structured legal training requirements risks weakening that protective framework. Other jurisdictions that explore alternative pathways to licensure typically require supervised apprenticeships or defined legal coursework — not simply possession of an unrelated graduate degree. Conclusion HB 5465 does not meaningfully expand access for most West Virginians, given that fewer than 10% of adults hold a graduate degree. At the same time, it removes a core legal education requirement that has traditionally served to protect the public and maintain professional standards. For these reasons, I respectfully urge rejection of HB 5465 in its current form.
2026 Regular Session HB5154 (Judiciary)
Comment by: John Wells on February 13, 2026 15:18
This bill by Kayla Young is very much needed, considering that very little or NOTHING happens within the WVHRC in the time frame of one year. It takes them forever even to assign a case worker or investigator, not to mention the time it takes for people to find and retain legal assistance or counsel. The bill needs to be fully supported by both the Senate and House in unison. It's high time that this problem with the system be addressed by the Legislature. I also think that these so called secret or confidential WVHRC investigations should be made transparent for all parties. Secrecy WASTES so very much of the complainants time that it's ridiculous. I also thing the HRC should have the power to negotiate settlements or offer arbitration at the States expense, since WV is one of the poorest states in the union. It would save money and lessen the burden on civil courts immensely, and make the 6th Constitutional Amendment a reality[the right to face your accuser]  instead of a royal joke.
2026 Regular Session HB4106 (Judiciary)
Comment by: donna on February 13, 2026 15:01
I disagree that individuals aged 18 to 20 should be permitted to carry weapons without a permit. A significant portion of individuals in this age group, particularly those who have just turned 18, may lack the necessary maturity to responsibly own a weapon. Their perception of adulthood might lead them to believe they are invincible and can act without considering the repercussion. Without the proper training and proof of responsibility, they should not be allowed.
2026 Regular Session HB4712 (Judiciary)
Comment by: Kaleigh Washington on February 13, 2026 14:24
Drunk driving is not an accident. It’s a knowingly dangerous choice.
2026 Regular Session HB4712 (Judiciary)
Comment by: Cristy Anderson on February 13, 2026 13:53
Waiting until someone dies to push for harsh consequences is too late for the loved ones left behind and the individual killed. When a parent drives drunk with their own children, WV family courts will give full custody to the drunk driving parent.  This will happen even if CPS substantiates abuse. The non-drunk driving, safe parent will be accused of “parental alienation” or “not encouraging a positive relationship” for asking for a stiff consequence for the parent who could have killed the children.  The safe parent loses custody to the parent who made a deliberate choice to drink and drive with children. Until our consequences are stiff at all levels, for all offenders, regardless of familial status, WV is teaching our next generation that driving drunk is acceptable.
2026 Regular Session HB4712 (Judiciary)
Comment by: Stephanie Ransom on February 13, 2026 13:50
I fully support HB 4712!
2026 Regular Session HB4712 (Judiciary)
Comment by: Robin Pritchett on February 13, 2026 13:04
The injustice that was carried out in the case of Baylea’s murder. Is just horrendous. essentially an 18 year old, legal adult, who made bad decisions. To drink alcohol,underage in this state, use cocaine , ultimately serves no time. Rehab and home confinement. Where is the justice in this? Baylea, lost her life. Her family lost a sister, daughter, granddaughter, niece, aunt. Her husband lost his wife and the potential for having a family with her. Ultimately I feel like the owner of the vehicle, the driver and the person who contributed to the defendants condition and allowing her to drive should also be held accountable. Legally and financially. The issues of citizens of this state meeting their demise by tractor trailers, intoxicated drivers has been happening more frequently. Stiffer penalties and judges who apply those penalties are a requirement.
2026 Regular Session HB4712 (Judiciary)
Comment by: Naeomey Stinnette on February 13, 2026 12:37

I feel as though the time sentenced and fines NEED to be doubled for DUI . In the case of Baylea Bower she got 0 justice , while Destany walked away with a slap on the wrist after taking a precious life . I never knew Baylea personally but she was clearly the light of everyone’s life . On the other hand I knew Destany personally , we were once very close and she didn’t start out this way . Her mother was her biggest enabler and continued to allow her to do these things . I started to notice how much this girl was drinking and I reached out multiple times asking “Hey is everything okay” , “Why are you drinking everyday” , “You’re clearly trying to escape something to be drinking that much” , and everytime I got the same response from those close to her “Oh she’s fine” or “Well that’s her choice” . It was very much so brushed off every single time and that was simply enough for me to choose not to be around her . At the time I genuinely couldn’t figure out how she was drinking EVERY SINGLE DAY , still showing up the work , drinking immediately after getting off work and continuing with this same routine DAILY , as everyone knows now she was using cocaine very often to keep up with this routine . At the time of her ending Baylea’s life I know she was coked out driving back to Mullens after have being awake for a few days ultimately resulting in her falling asleep behind the wheel , crossing the median and killing Baylea head on .  Maybe I would’ve had more compassion for Destany in the beginning of this process had she actually had remorse for ENDING A LIFE , yet she could care less that she took Baylea from her family . Destany was more upset about losing all her piercings for her MRI than she was about taking an innocent life , that spoke volumes to me and told me exactly who she was as a person . I truly don’t understand how she walked away with a slap on the wrist considering that when police and EMT arrived she told them a boy “T” (she was great friends with him) was the person driving her truck at the time of the accident , she tried to let someone else take the fall for her actions and yet she still ended up free . This is only showing Destany that she can continue her behavior and will have 0 consequences at the end of the day .

2026 Regular Session HB5086 (Judiciary)
Comment by: Ronnie Williams on February 13, 2026 12:25
I'd love to just let the "first responder" and law enforcement definitions just serve us all but that ambiguity would most likely exclude a huge group of state employees.  Please add "Corrections employees" specifically to the list of eligible jobs/titles.  Probably the largest single group and the one with the most need for legitimate Peer Support services.
2026 Regular Session HB4712 (Judiciary)
Comment by: Amber Lilly on February 13, 2026 12:13
I have so many friends and family who have been affected by drunk drivers. We have lost many. Punishment is necessary!
2026 Regular Session HB4712 (Judiciary)
Comment by: Jennifer Snodgrass on February 13, 2026 11:39
  1. The current laws in our state of West Virginia do NOT currently reflect a just sentence for people that choose to drive while under the influence of drugs or alcohol.
  2. The person that took Baileigh's life, senselessly, was given a slap on the wrist and that should never be possible again!
2026 Regular Session HB4712 (Judiciary)
Comment by: Regina Hoff on February 13, 2026 11:24
Asking that this bill be passed for the lawbreakers will receive the right punishment.
2026 Regular Session HB4712 (Judiciary)
Comment by: Emilee Browning on February 13, 2026 11:17
My heart is broken for Baylea Bowers family. I hope this can pass in hopes it will make someone think before getting behind the wheel while being impaired.
2026 Regular Session HB4712 (Judiciary)
Comment by: Sandra Williams on February 13, 2026 11:09
Please pass Bill 4712.
2026 Regular Session HB4712 (Judiciary)
Comment by: Sabrina Turley on February 13, 2026 11:08
Please consider harsher punishments for these types of reckless crimes!
2026 Regular Session HB4712 (Judiciary)
Comment by: Emily Nelson on February 13, 2026 11:05
driving under the influence is a choice. A choice that affects families greatly. It needs to be taken more seriously. People continue to do it because the consequences are minimal.
2026 Regular Session HB4712 (Judiciary)
Comment by: Lisa Stewart on February 13, 2026 10:58
Please pass House Bill 4712 we need better legislation that will stop some of the Drinking and Drugging and getting behind the wheel of a vehicle
2026 Regular Session HB4712 (Judiciary)
Comment by: Don (Duke) Stewart on February 13, 2026 10:53
Please pass House Bill 4712
2026 Regular Session HB4712 (Judiciary)
Comment by: Rebecca Miller on February 13, 2026 10:39
Please pass this bill. I don’t know this girl personally, but the maximum sentencing for this crime is absurd. People need to realize there are consequences to our actions. Everyone can/will mess up, but to kill someone while driving under the influence, shouldn’t be one of them. Addiction is one thing, driving while intoxicated is another. This precious girls life was took because of a 1 sec decision to get behind the wheel. How would you feel if this were your child??? Actions need consequences!
2026 Regular Session HB4712 (Judiciary)
Comment by: Kellie Lucas on February 13, 2026 10:35
Taking a stand for all the victims and their families.
2026 Regular Session HB4712 (Judiciary)
Comment by: Butch Barker on February 13, 2026 10:33
This needs to be done
2026 Regular Session HB4712 (Judiciary)
Comment by: Austin Evans on February 13, 2026 10:32
I strongly support this bill because the current penalties for DUI cases that result in death do not reflect the permanent loss suffered by families and communities. When a person chooses to drive under the influence, it is a conscious decision that can have irreversible consequences. The law should clearly reflect the seriousness of that choice. Stronger sentencing in these cases is not about revenge it is about accountability, deterrence, and justice for the victims who no longer have a voice. Families should not have to feel that the system failed to value the lives of their loved ones. Passing this bill will send a clear message that our state takes impaired driving fatalities seriously and is committed to protecting innocent people on our roads. I urge you to move this bill forward.
2026 Regular Session HB4712 (Judiciary)
Comment by: Kaylee Butcher on February 13, 2026 10:22
My husband was killed in a similar situation. The charges just aren’t high enough for her to face the time she deserves.
2026 Regular Session HB4712 (Judiciary)
Comment by: Tonya Farmer on February 13, 2026 10:17
No one should get off of drinking and driving and killing somebody I had a family member that was hit by a drunk driver and suffers every day and she had her in law with her which got killed in the wreck do to a drunk driver it should not be put off as nothing if they are driving drunk and hit and kill somebody they should be held accountable for it..Thank you
2026 Regular Session HB4712 (Judiciary)
Comment by: Lonnie M Skeens on February 13, 2026 10:09
This Law must be passed ! No other family should suffer the loss of losing a loved one to a driver who chooses to get behind the wheel while high on drugs or alcohol! Stronger penalties are needed!
2026 Regular Session HB4712 (Judiciary)
Comment by: Brittney Tagliente on February 13, 2026 09:54
Please pass Bill
2026 Regular Session HB4712 (Judiciary)
Comment by: ryen on February 13, 2026 09:48
i think that this bill should most certainly be passed. Accountability is huge. getting behind the wheel of a vehicle impaired is a choice, when you make that choice you are willing to accept the consequences of that choice.
2026 Regular Session HB4712 (Judiciary)
Comment by: Peggy Massey on February 13, 2026 09:31
I really believe that this bill needs to be approved and passed so that those who lose loved ones might feel some comfort.
2026 Regular Session HB4712 (Judiciary)
Comment by: Toni Rogers on February 13, 2026 09:31
When you lose a friend to a drunk driver, you will understand the importance of this bill. It won't bring your loved one back, but maybe it will make someone think of the consequences of drunk driving. #justice for baylea
2026 Regular Session HB4712 (Judiciary)
Comment by: Cecil Wiseman on February 13, 2026 09:26
House Bill 4712 needs passed. In my opinion even House Bill 4712 is too lenient, penalties should be more than doubled for death from DUI
2026 Regular Session HB4712 (Judiciary)
Comment by: Amy Haught on February 13, 2026 09:25
I agree with enforcing tougher penalties for those choosing to drive under the influence, especially when it leads to bodily harm or the loss of a life
2026 Regular Session HB4143 (Judiciary)
Comment by: James Cook on February 13, 2026 09:17
I agree with this bill because it reinforces legal clarity and protects women’s rights. Clear definitions help ensure laws are applied fairly and consistently. Women’s protections were created for specific biological and social reasons, and those protections should remain intact. The bill supports safety, fairness, and equal opportunity for women.
2026 Regular Session HB4712 (Judiciary)
Comment by: Hanna Conrad on February 13, 2026 09:03

The people of West Virginia will never stop drinking and driving if they know there are little to no consequences. DUI’s are an obvious problem in West Virginia. Hold people accountable and the rate will go down! People are not scared enough! A slap on the wrist is NOT enough for murder.

2026 Regular Session HB4712 (Judiciary)
Comment by: Wesley Nelson on February 13, 2026 09:01
The lack of sentencing in this state has been astounding for those who have cause death or injury while under the influence behind the wheel. As a resident of Boone County, I have seen two of my peers die at the hands of drunk driving accidents while the individuals who causes these deaths were given sentences in which they were never in a prison. How can we measure the value of a human life and cherish what we have been given by god? The value of lives taken seem to be meaningless when taken by those behind the wheel who are under the influence of any substance. This is an absolute travesty that needs addressed in the state of West Virginia, and a matter which will not bring those we have lost back, but hopefully bring forth a more appropriate level of justice though I feel no sentence could ever replace those lost.  This legislation would proactively lead to greater influence not only for furtherance of justice served but hopefully deter anyone from getting behind the wheel inebriated. As it stands, there isn’t enough worry by those getting behind the wheel in an altered state because their greatest penalty seems to only extend to house arrest and/or rehabilitation.
2026 Regular Session SB30 (Judiciary)
Comment by: James Cook on February 13, 2026 08:55
I disagree with this bill because allowing young adults to carry concealed weapons without a permit could increase safety risks. People ages 18 to 20 may lack the maturity or training needed to responsibly carry a firearm in public. Permit requirements help ensure basic safety training and background checks. Removing those requirements could lead to more accidents or misuse of weapons. Public safety should be prioritized over convenience.
2026 Regular Session HB4712 (Judiciary)
Comment by: Connie Pruett on February 13, 2026 08:53
I think this bill will help stop so much drinking and driving, the punishment this lady received on 2-12-26  in Raleigh Co was a joke, shame on the judge for using the deceased compassion as a reason to make this decision. Please pass this bill for the future so no one else will have to go through this again.
2026 Regular Session HB4712 (Judiciary)
Comment by: Jessica Hatfield on February 13, 2026 08:46
Please pass this bill so Justice will be served
2026 Regular Session HB4712 (Judiciary)
Comment by: Marsha Caudill on February 13, 2026 08:41
This needs to be passed
2026 Regular Session HB4712 (Judiciary)
Comment by: Kileigh Wahl on February 13, 2026 08:41
justice for baylea!
2026 Regular Session HB4712 (Judiciary)
Comment by: Brenda Smith on February 13, 2026 08:40
Absolutely the people who kill and destroy families must be held accountable and suffer the consequences instead of getting by with murder.
2026 Regular Session HB4712 (Judiciary)
Comment by: Julia Allen on February 13, 2026 08:35
We need this bill to pass. If someone is intoxicated or on drugs and they injur or kill someone they should have to be punished. Justice was not done for Bailey Bower, the girl that killed her got a snack on the hand
2026 Regular Session HB4712 (Judiciary)
Comment by: Patsy Miller on February 13, 2026 08:32
I hope this bill passes. I least a sister many years ago and almost a brother to a drunk driver right in front of our home. The alcohol was right inside the man’s truck. He didn’t receive any punishment for the crime. Taking someone’s life is not ok. I know sometimes there are accidents and things can’t be help but you chose to drink and then get behind a vehicle. My heart goes out to the Bowers family. We need to do better West Virginia. I bet the judge would feel different if it was his son or daughter.
2026 Regular Session HB4712 (Judiciary)
Comment by: Lisa Hildebrand on February 13, 2026 08:31
This bill must be passed so that lives will be saved. Imposing significant imprisonment will cause individuals to rethink driving while impaired.
2026 Regular Session HB4712 (Judiciary)
Comment by: Megan Green on February 13, 2026 08:25
People should be held accountable for their actions.   Stronger laws are needed.
2026 Regular Session HB4712 (Judiciary)
Comment by: Samantha Bays on February 13, 2026 08:22
Baylea was a light in this dark word! She never treated anyone like a stranger! Since day one she treated my daughter like a part of her family! She would join in on swim days and would play with my kids! She never made my daughter feel small. Baylea was just that kind of person.
2026 Regular Session HB4712 (Judiciary)
Comment by: Melissa Fox on February 13, 2026 08:19
I think this law should be made cause they make the decision to get behind the wheel of the vehicle while drinking and driving and they should get the full time and no slap on the wrist cause they made the decision to do it they need to face the consequences.
2026 Regular Session HB4712 (Judiciary)
Comment by: Karla Peters on February 13, 2026 08:13
Justice needs to be given and punishment needs to be harsher.
2026 Regular Session HB4712 (Judiciary)
Comment by: Selina Wimmer on February 13, 2026 08:13
I believe that the punishment for driving DUI/DWI should be much harsher for those who offend. As someone who pulled this stupid stunt a long time ago, looking back now, to be honest, I should’ve gotten jail time because I was putting EVERYONES life in jeopardy when I done that. It’s something I’ll never forgive myself for. While the offenders resume their lives after this heinous act, the victims family is left to mourn and suffer for the rest of their lives. That innocent person deserved to live out the rest of their lives in peace and happiness, it’s not fair that the offender basically gets a slap on the wrist and then release to probably keep taking the chance of doing it again and again. Driving DUI/DWI is playing Russian roulette with everyone’s life, including that persons own life. These minimum sentences are tell people that it’s ok for them to go ahead and repeat offend. It’s pathetic and and a slap in the face to the families who fall victim to this senseless crime. Please, make these penalties more harsh!
2026 Regular Session HB4712 (Judiciary)
Comment by: Tiffany Ellison on February 13, 2026 08:02
This absolutely needs passed!!!
2026 Regular Session HB4712 (Judiciary)
Comment by: Christen Blackburn on February 13, 2026 07:50
I am writing in strong support of HB 1234. Driving under the influence is not a mistake — it is a reckless and preventable decision that too often ends in irreversible tragedy. When someone chooses to drive impaired and takes the life of another person, the consequences should reflect the severity and permanence of that loss. Current sentencing standards do not always align with the devastation experienced by victims’ families and communities. A longer and more meaningful sentence for individuals who drive under the influence and cause a fatality would reinforce accountability, promote deterrence, and affirm the value of the lives lost. Stronger penalties send a clear message that impaired driving is not a minor offense — it is a deadly act with lifelong consequences. Families who lose loved ones deserve justice that reflects the gravity of the harm done. I respectfully urge the Senate to pass HB 1234 to strengthen protections for the public and uphold accountability for those whose reckless choices result in the death of another driver. Thank you for your time and consideration.
2026 Regular Session HB4712 (Judiciary)
Comment by: Tamra crum on February 13, 2026 07:36
This should have been the punishment along time ago but it wasn't so now is the time to step up and do the right thing
2026 Regular Session HB4712 (Judiciary)
Comment by: Nicole curry on February 13, 2026 07:27
The bill needs to pass the young lady didn’t even get jail time for killing an innocent soul named Bailey bower . The system failed Bailey and her family and the ppl . This gilr was high on cocaine , alcohol and more . Ppl go to jail longer for killing animals. They judge needs fired as well he needs stripped of his robe and title and license took . The system has failed a beautiful soul and her family and friends . Laws need to change the ppl r outraged about this please pass this bill . Please let baileys name and story be heard
2026 Regular Session HB4712 (Judiciary)
Comment by: Roy kirk on February 13, 2026 07:23
stronger penalties
2026 Regular Session HB4712 (Judiciary)
Comment by: Lisa Jude on February 13, 2026 07:18
I strongly support this bill.  This is a problem through our WV . Recently my grandchildren were in a car coming home from school with their aunt.  They were hit in the side of the car only because she had time to swerve and miss a head on collision.  This person proceeded on to hit a trailer and completely destroyed the front porch.  He was high on drugs and had drugs on him and this was his third offense driving on a revoked license. Obviously a slap on the wrist isn’t enough to save families from this happening.  Stricter penalties and punishment is a must!
2026 Regular Session HB4712 (Judiciary)
Comment by: Genna Harold on February 13, 2026 07:07
Hello I am reaching out again to express support for this bill, now known as Baylea’s Law. Please pass this bill!
2026 Regular Session HB4712 (Judiciary)
Comment by: Christopher Bias on February 13, 2026 07:00
Please make tougher penalties for those making bad decisions that crush the lives of others. Thank you
2026 Regular Session HB4712 (Judiciary)
Comment by: Savannah peavler on February 13, 2026 06:49
For stricter punishments.
2026 Regular Session HB4712 (Judiciary)
Comment by: James A Craig on February 13, 2026 06:42
  • We need this .bill updated. My daughter was killed by drunk driver and pleaded quilty to DUI  CAUSING DEATH AND HAVING A CONTROLED SUBSTANCE. She was supposed to be sentenced 3-15 years but at the sentencing the judge suspended sentence and gave her 6 months home confinement and after that 18 months in youth rehabilitation center
Tell me how this is even possible my 24 year old murdered and only receives this sentence at the hands of  Raleigh Co. Judge
2026 Regular Session HB4712 (Judiciary)
Comment by: Edward Sutphin on February 13, 2026 06:09
Please get this bill passed and make it where the judges have to abide by the standout forth in the new law!!
2026 Regular Session HB4712 (Judiciary)
Comment by: Kayla Meadows on February 13, 2026 06:04
This law should be passed to keep something like this from happening again. If the punishment is raised, it might keep people from drinking and driving and not caring about the consequences from their actions. Baylea should still be here. This was all preventable. People need to know you could change someone’s life in an instant. Baylea’s family will never be the same again without her. The minimum years in jail right now are not keeping people off the road when they are drunk. The punishment needs to be higher to make people think before they get in a car and drive while they’re drunk.
2026 Regular Session HB4712 (Judiciary)
Comment by: Ammie Cooper on February 13, 2026 05:55
I myself have witnessed first hand what a drunk driver can do to a family, my aunt was killed by a drunk driver back in 1993 April 15th. I still watch a father grief, a mother grief for their daughter, a sister and brother grief for their sister that non of them will ever see again because a careless fool got behind the wheel of a vehicle. They never received their closure nor peace.. but yet witnessed the same thing happen from the same man to another woman just a miles down the road on a different date, if we had a better law I know for a fact one life could have been saved one of those day’s. So when you go to consider this please think of not only sweet innocent Baylea but all of the others out there, and think to self what if that was your mother? Your father? Your sibling? Or even worse YOUR CHILD? That this horrible thing happened to, and that you see your child’s murder walking free while your child is deceased and can never come back because of a careless fools decisions. When someone gets behind the wheel intoxicated.. they understand what they’re putting on the line, their life or someone else’s or even a whole family.. so now it’s time to face consequences and take action so maybe next time there won’t be a next time for this to happen or take place. God Bless you all, I hope and pray that this will never happen to any of y'all, it truly does destroy a family in multiple ways you couldn’t even imagine.
2026 Regular Session HB4712 (Judiciary)
Comment by: Justin Elliott Miller on February 13, 2026 05:47
My thoughts about on house bill 4712:   Doubling the minimum/maximum sentences will not do a bit of good as long as we have judges who ignore the minimum and give slaps on the wrist for these needless killings of innocent people by lawbreakers who laugh in the face of laws while having a "good" time. In my Granddaughter in Laws case, her killer expressed zero remorse for her actions, blaming others for causing her to use drugs and alcohol and drive.  She even bragged about her lifestyle on her social media page about living the party life.  So!  Until there is a mandatory confinement for their actions there is no deterrent.
2026 Regular Session HB4712 (Judiciary)
Comment by: April Haney on February 13, 2026 05:44
The injustice that was given to this family today is beyond heartbreaking.   Please grant this law so it never happens again.
2026 Regular Session HB4712 (Judiciary)
Comment by: Adam Wright on February 13, 2026 05:38
Please support HB4712
2026 Regular Session HB4712 (Judiciary)
Comment by: hannah lovejoy on February 13, 2026 05:26
💙
2026 Regular Session HB4712 (Judiciary)
Comment by: Erika Webb on February 13, 2026 05:22
There has to be greater consequences for dui causing death. People drink and drive daily and I know they always will but maybe this new Bill will make someone think twice before getting behind that wheel. Baylea’s death has affected and destroyed so many lives and broken an entire community and just when we though that justice was going to be served, the girl that took her life was handed a slap on the wrist. The punishment absolutely did not fit the crime and was an absolute slap in the face to everyone who knew and loved Baylea. It could be your or mine family next time someone decides to drink and drive…. we have to make a change NOW!
2026 Regular Session HB4712 (Judiciary)
Comment by: Stephanie Massey on February 13, 2026 05:02
Legislators, It is imperative that this bill is passed, with definitive punishment for DUI causing death. Baylea Bower was killed without mercy due to a drug and alcohol laden driver. This is a crime, and should be punished to the full extent of the law. It’s time to take a stand for victims of crimes such as this. It’s time to stop the pity parties for the offenders. Please pass this bill.
2026 Regular Session HB4712 (Judiciary)
Comment by: Eric Halstead on February 13, 2026 04:13
Horrendous outcome of our current law and judgement in the case of Destiny Lester!  Basically no jail time for taking a life while under the influence of cocaine and alcohol! No true consequence from the law on the books!  Please consider Baylee’s Law
2026 Regular Session HB4712 (Judiciary)
Comment by: Shawna jones on February 13, 2026 03:53
Hello there 38yrs ago my maternal grandfather got killed by a intoxicated driver and he didn't do no time and the state still paid for this intoxicated man to drive a motorized vehicle 😡,  but for this here family they was not served justice either today which is very very 😔 for taken a life 😔 😡,  and this bill here needs to be passed please, thank you very much
2026 Regular Session HB4868 (Judiciary)
Comment by: Toki on February 13, 2026 03:45
We definitely need this, especially given today digital age.
2026 Regular Session HB4712 (Judiciary)
Comment by: Beth on February 13, 2026 03:34
Once intoxicated a person can not make good decisions, the decisions are made prior to going out by planning to not drive, having a DD or simply knowing when to call an Uber. We live in a world where most think " that won't happen to me" and this is where this Bill is needed. Stronger punishment that is actually handed out may cause people to stop and think about their decisions. Life is precious, our babies are precious regardless of their age and they deserve to live a long happy life and not have it taken so tragic. Tougher sentences also comes with the legal system enforcing the punishment.