My name is Merle Jones, and I am a United States Army Veteran with over 23 years of service.  Thank you for the opportunity to provide my thoughts regarding Senate Bill 704. I respectfully submit my comments in opposition to SB 704 based on concerns about the bill’s impact on individual choice and access to trusted assistance concerning veterans’ benefits. SB 704, known as the Veterans’ Empowerment and Trust Safeguard Act, proposes to prohibit certain individuals from receiving compensation for assisting others with obtaining veterans’ benefits, as well as to regulate referrals and written fee agreements related to such assistance. The bill also seeks to define violations under the West Virginia Consumer Credit and Protection Act. As someone who has served this country and sworn an oath to defend the Constitution, I believe deeply in the principles of individual liberty, informed choice, and personal agency. While it is important to protect veterans from predatory or unscrupulous actors, I am concerned that the broad prohibitions in SB 704 may unintentionally limit veterans’ ability to choose from a range of qualified and reputable advocates or service providers when seeking assistance with navigating complex benefit systems. Veterans’ benefit processes are often detailed and nuanced, and many veterans rely on trusted advisors — including attorneys, accredited representatives, and experienced advocates — to help them understand their options and pursue their claims. Prescribing overly restrictive rules about who may be compensated for this work could narrow those options and reduce meaningful choice at a time when veterans most need support.  As a veteran, I value the freedom to choose the services I use, and I served to defend that freedom for all Americans. In nearly every area of life—taxes, Social Security, Medicare, healthcare—I can choose to use free services or pay a professional for assistance. I believe I should have that same choice when it comes to claims processing. Seeking and paying for help with a disability claim is no different than hiring someone to prepare my taxes. It is a personal decision, and it should remain my right to make. Public policy works best when it protects against abuse while still preserving flexibility and choice for those directly affected. I urge the committee to carefully reconsider moving forward with SB 704. Thank you for your time, consideration, and service to the State of West Virginia. Respectfully submitted, Merle Jones CSM (R) U.S. Army Veteran

I think this bill should include solar generation and less emphasis on coal dependancy. Why? A major West Virginia electric utility supplier just announced construction of a new 1,200-megawatt natural gas power plant and 70 megawatts of new solar generation around the state. At the same time hundreds of West Virginia coal miners are losing their jobs. Why not build a new coal fired power plant? The political climate for coal hasn't been this good for decades. It is generally much cheaper and faster to build a natural gas-fired power plant than a coal fired plant. Gas plants have lower capital costs, often ranging from $500 to $2500 per kW. In over 99% of cases, new utility-scale solar projects have lower capital costs, and in many regions, they are even cheaper to operate than existing, already-built coal plants. It's the market that is dictating use of energy sources other than coal. West Virginia had better keep up.  

House Bill 4983 — one of the proposed data center bills — has passed out of the House Energy & Public Works Committee on Tuesday. It will be on the House floor for 2nd reading on Monday, February 16. (All Delegates can propose an amendment to the bill at this time.) During committee, a bipartisan amendment to add stronger transparency around water use was introduced. After nearly two hours of discussion, the amendment failed on an 8-12 vote, with 5 members absent. The bill advanced without added water-use disclosure requirements. PLEASE SUPPORT AN AMENDMENT TO HB 4983 FOR WATER USAGE TRANSPARENCY IN THE CERTIFICATION PROCESS.

Politicians jamming these data centers down the throats of West Virginians who clearly do not want them as "neighbors" speaks to their lack of true representation. Even this bill refers to them as 'a high impact data center'. Another example of representatives allowing out-of-state interests to take advantage of West Virginia with little benefit to the people living near these centers. Are we that desperate for new business?

Edibles would be an excellent addition to the medical cannabis family in West Virginia. Capsules are fine but they are not time released so what’s wrong with adding a little flavor to our lives in different edible forms. I don’t understand how we are always falling behind, are the pill addicts really that profitable? Let our cannibis continue to grow! (Pun intended)

I am in full support of the passage of this bill.

Please vote YES on this bill. In 2023–2024, the median household income in West Virginia was approximately $57,917 to $59,608, with some estimates for real median household income reaching $63,150. So, the cap at $150k is generous. If you make more than $150,000 annually you are doing much better than most of your neighbors.  Those at the median household income pay the same prices for food, utilities, or gasoline as do those making over $150,000 annually. This is one area to help level the playing field.

I stand for

House Bill 4712

Vote Yes

This bill is needed desperately so that anyone who drinks & drives while under the influence of either drugs or alcohol causing death gets a stricter sentence than the current law carries.

Please vote yes, this is a common sense bill which honors those who have paid their dues for decades. Many seniors advancing in age face costly health related issues. Any financial relief is welcomed.

Baylea’s mother lost a child to a drunk driver. Parents in WV family courts are losing children to drunk drivers too….. when the court gives full custody to the drunk driving parent, despite police reports, safety plans, and CPS substantiated abuse.  This will happen when the other coparent has no legal history, no substance abuse history, is financially stable, and is not a troublemaker at all. Why would this happen? Because the non-drunk driving co-parent pushed for prosecution of the drunk-driving parent. The non-drunk-driving parent is accused of “alienating behavior” or “not encouraging a positive relationship” between the children and parent who could have killed the children. Yes, seeking accountability for a drunk driver becomes weaponized against the safe, protective parent. The safe parent will be accused of “teaching the children that the drunk driver could have killed them.” When innocent lives, like Baylea Bowers, are taken, the system pretends to be shocked and outraged.  The system feigns, “What could we have done differently to prevent this?” If Destany Lester grew up watching the legal system of WV give free passes or even reward drunk drivers, the system itself bears some onus in each death that occurs in the state. It is teaching the next generation to normalize drunk driving.  It is teaching the next generation that if you drive drunk and risk killing someone, the system will punish those who seek prosecution, and it will reward those who choose this risky behavior. Studies and statistics show that the greatest deterrent to drunk driving is “certainty of punishment over severity of punishment.” All drunk drivers need to know that they will certainly be charged, prosecuted, and laws will be equally enforced, regardless of familial status, regardless of job status, regardless of any other factors. The confidence we place in our judiciary depends upon equal enforcement of our laws, no matter who commits the crime. WV needs tougher punishments for drunk driving and we need to see those consequences equally enforced, possibly removing or severely limiting judicial discretion in sentencing.  We also have to completely prohibit retaliatory acts against those who push for prosecution of true and factual dangerous behavior.

So the state wants to eliminate assessing certain taxes, but allow for more tax exemptions. The math doesn't work. Alcohol, tobacco, vapes and gambling are not necessities for life. Keep collecting taxes on these non-necessities. We live in a very rural state that requires we drive to the grocery store, doctor's office, and drug store to name a few. In view of that, I would consider gasoline a necessity. Yet, we pay roughly 35.7 cents per gallon for gasoline. Am I supporting eliminating taxes on gasoline? No, but a reduction or elimination makes more sense than on non-essential items.

I am a United States Marine Corps veteran who has spent my post-service career working with and advocating for fellow veterans. I appreciate West Virginia’s efforts to protect veterans from predatory practices, and I share that goal. My concern is that SB 704, as drafted, may unintentionally reduce veterans’ access to assistance rather than improve it. Many veterans seek help beyond traditional free resources because they experience confusion, delays, or limited communication in the VA claims process. For some veterans, additional support—whether from accredited representatives or private consultants—can be the difference between successfully navigating the system and abandoning a claim they rightfully earned. Federal law already governs who may formally represent veterans before the VA as an accredited agent or attorney. Those rules apply to individuals acting as a veteran’s legal representative or agent of record in the preparation, presentation, or prosecution of claims. Entities that do not act in that legal representative capacity fall outside that framework under federal statute and regulation  . There are also important constitutional considerations. Courts have repeatedly recognized that giving specialized advice and exchanging information are protected forms of speech. Broad prohibitions on compensated assistance can implicate veterans’ rights to speak, associate, and petition their government for earned benefits  . My concern is not about any one company or business model. It is about ensuring veterans retain freedom of choice while being protected from deception. Strong consumer safeguards—such as transparency requirements, written agreements, and prohibitions on misleading practices—can protect veterans without limiting their lawful options. West Virginia veterans deserve both protection and choice. I respectfully urge lawmakers to consider whether SB 704 strikes the right balance and whether narrower, targeted protections could achieve the same goal without restricting access to assistance. Respectfully submitted, John Blomstrom U.S. Marine Corps Veteran

Please vote yes. Many seniors advancing in age face costly health related issues. Any financial relief is welcomed.

I urge you to OPPOSE this.  This is not a solution. They have committed a crime, and they have done their time. This is inhumane, cruel and unusual punishment. I truly can’t believe this is even introduced. Proper housing, support, psychological help and resources are what is needed. This is listed in the DSM as a mental illness. Look under treatment for this.  Is this what is recommended?  No, above and probably an antidepressant.  Unfortunately they don’t go for treatment in the first place, because of the shame. Honestly, I feel like we’re going back in time, like the slavery days, and before, with beheading, or cut off their tongues. Instead, please give the people the resources they need, not this outrageous punishment. Thank you for listening. Research has shown that less than 3 % reoffend.

Please put this on the scrap pile of ill conceived ideas. It's bad enough the president signed an exucutive order to dismantle the federal Department of Education. This was a push to reduce federal oversight and return educational control to states. And now you want to eliminate the West Virginia Department of Education? Either education in this state is a priority, or it is not. This bill would suggest that it is not. The West Virginia Department of Education is the last line of defense for education in our state. Not all school districts are prepared or equipped to perform at a high level without oversight.

To whom it may concern, There needs to be stricter laws for  the people who are driving under the influence of alcohol, cocaine, marijuana, meth, or any other drug there is. When involving a murder it should be 25 years max. The ruling in this case is right down ridiculous. That murderer (Lester) got put in time out basically, for killing another human being. Robing (Bower) of her life but yet Lester still gets to go on about her life like nothing happened. There are people in Jail today that's been there for years over selling marijuana. A murder (Lester) gets 6 months home confinement, and 6 months in a rehabilitation center. Really? really? Make it make sense please. The ruling in this case just give permission that it's ok to drink and drive high and drunk and kill someone and face no consequences. Who will be the next victim?

Wow, there seems to be no end to terrible ideas and a waste of time. This is a glowing example. Please do not advance this.

Tougher laws needed for vehiclar homicide

At the very lease, everyone should at least get minimum wage. Also raise the minimum wage!

Needs to pass on behalf of the family of Baylea Bower, prayers continues for just.

This needs to pass what a disgrace at the sentencing for Destiny Lester.

Dear Members of the West Virginia House of Delegates, I am writing to express serious concern about House Bill 5053, which would create a blanket 90-day limit preventing families from withdrawing a child from public school for homeschooling while an active truancy or pre-petition process is underway. West Virginia Legislature This bill may seem intended to address absenteeism, but it fails to protect children who are struggling in public schools due to bullying, unsafe environments, social stress, or mental health issues. For many students, especially those who are bullied or feel unsafe, continuing to attend school can cause significant emotional harm. One public commenter pointed out that this bill assumes families choosing homeschooling during truancy cases are simply seeking an “easy out,” when in reality these decisions are sometimes made to protect a child’s well-being. home.wvlegislature.gov Families should have the freedom to choose the learning environment that best supports their child’s growth, safety, and happiness. Homeschooled children are already part of a regulated system under West Virginia law, where parents must file a notice of intent and maintain educational standards. Removing the option to homeschool for 90 days because of attendance issues removes that freedom for all families, regardless of their individual circumstances. U.S. Department of Education This bill also raises concerns about equal protection because it singles out homeschooling as a response to truancy without applying similar limitations to other educational alternatives. home.wvlegislature.gov In many cases, a child struggling socially or emotionally in school needs more flexibility and support, not restrictive timelines. Rather than cutting into parents’ rights and limiting educational choice, legislators should focus on targeted solutions that help at-risk students feel safe and supported — whether in public school or through homeschooling. I urge you to vote against House Bill 5053 in its current form and support policies that truly protect all children’s rights, safety, and educational future. Thank you for your service.

ALL West Virginians deserve access to clean drinking water. Throwing a band-aid over a mortal wound is not going to be helpful. Adequate funding should be allocated to completely restore clean water access for everyone. This is the job of politicians in this state. Also, allowing data centers to take over in our state is a death sentence for WV. Unregulated bottom feeders will use our water and pollute it without any oversight. Look out for our future of this state like you are paid to do.

I support this bill! Long live Baylea!! ✝️🕊💔

I appreciate the effort being made to address this public health crisis. This bill could be improved with the following amendments:

• Directing emergency funds directly to municipalities and PSDs based on need as determined by the DEP Drinking Water Intended Use Plan ranked projects.
• Removing fines for failing systems to pay this fund. We cannot "rob Peter to pay Paul." We cannot fine failing systems to pay for other failing systems.
• Allocate $250 million in emergency infrastructure funding for immediate use to address this ongoing public health crisis. (In just 4 of these counties it would cost $287M to fund what the DEP labels "high priority" projects there).
• Seeking "private sector partnerships" hastens the privatization of our public water systems. Remove this.
• Continuing a loan/grant program only leads to unequal distribution of funds. Send funds to each of these counties and allow them to address their top DEP ranked projects.

Allowing edibles in WV for medical marijuana patients is the right thing to do. Patients should not be limited to what they can use.

Please bring edibles to my store  

This was so heartbreaking. I’m confused how you can be under the influence of all this, cross three lanes of traffic, take someone’s life, and not do any jail time.  Please make this make sense.

I support this bill, and I think it would benefit the area.

Edibles need to be legalized due to reduce the amount of smoking it takes me to use.

Im a medical marijuanna patient and i would love for the state to look into making gummies for us

I support the idea of addressing clean water infrastructure in southern West Virginia, but this bill doesn’t go far enough for the crisis our communities are facing. Spreading $10 million across 13 counties won’t come close to fixing systems that have been underfunded for decades. Many of these communities already struggle just to keep aging infrastructure running. Requiring them to navigate more grant and loan applications puts the burden back on the very places that lack resources and staff. Clean water is basic infrastructure, not something rural communities should have to fight for year after year. I’m also concerned about provisions that could increase privatization or fine systems that are already failing — those costs ultimately land on residents through higher bills. West Virginians don’t need more process; we need real investment that matches the scale of the problem. I urge lawmakers to strengthen this bill with larger direct funding and fewer barriers so help reaches communities quickly and fairly.

I support HB 5345 because stable childcare is essential for working families and for our local workforce. Childcare providers have fixed costs every day — paying staff, maintaining safe ratios, and providing a safe learning environment — regardless of whether a child attends three hours or eight. The current hourly reimbursement model creates unnecessary instability and makes it harder for providers to plan and keep programs open. Basing payments on enrollment rather than daily attendance is a practical, common-sense approach that helps childcare providers remain financially stable, supports parents who rely on consistent care, and strengthens our community and economy. Please support HB 5345 to help ensure reliable childcare for West Virginia families.

West Virginia, a state ravaged by overdoses, addiction, cancer, and other health issues, currently denies medical patients access to important forms of medication while simultaneously restricting patients from using the most common method of consumption, smoking. I have work experience in the industry both in Colorado and in West Virginia and have been a patron of cannabis in many recreational states. I have had patients who have sobered up from other hard drugs such as methamphetamine and pain killers. Restricting access by limiting methods of consumption, which are not all created equal and affect everyone differently, only hurts consumers/patients. To put it bluntly, cannabis dispensaries aren't advertising to children either, as children aren't purchasing cannabis from us. There should be common sense cannabis laws just like there are gun laws - keep it put up and locked up, out of access from your children. Punish the bad actors, don't punish the majority. And where does the tax revenue go btw? Apparently, to train cops? Most states have tax laws that allocate taxes from cannabis to help things around the state that actually need it - not police or ICE. Our highways, our schools (Logan Co High School has mold growing all over it, there's several others that have been shut down due to the conditions of the schools), our substance abuse centers (many of which have shut down due to lack of funding, like the ones in Southern West Virginia), cancer research, programs for ex convicts, etc.   Our government is SEVERELY failing our state regarding cannabis regulations.

I support this bill

Yes, edibles please!

We need edibles to be available in WV. It doesn’t make any sense at all why it’s not. Some people need that form of medication. Not everyone consumes flower or pills. Please fix this injustice.

Hello my name is James  im am 60 years old  I wish  you will  pass the bill  we need  this for  ar sceneries its good for  back pain  and arthritis  thank you

I support this bill and appreciate the effort to expand West Virginia’s medical cannabis program to include edible products. Patients need more options, especially non-smokable formats that are easier to dose and often better suited for pain, sleep, nausea, and other qualifying conditions. I am writing to respectfully request an amendment that ensures West Virginia hemp-derived cannabinoid manufacturers and operators are eligible to participate in the medical edibles program. West Virginia already has compliant hemp businesses that have operated responsibly in-state for years — investing in facilities, employees, testing, labeling, and regulatory compliance. These businesses have real-world experience producing edible products safely and consistently. If the medical program expands to include edibles but limits licensing only to current medical cannabis dispensary/grower structures, the state risks: •    shutting out experienced WV manufacturers who are already doing this work, •    forcing patients into a less competitive market, •    and sending economic opportunity to larger out-of-state operators. A straightforward solution is to add language that allows licensed/registered WV hemp operators in good standing to apply for a medical edibles license or endorsement, with clear requirements such as: •    third-party lab testing (COAs) for potency and contaminants, •    compliant packaging and labeling, •    batch tracking and recall procedures, •    WV-based manufacturing standards, •    and enforcement for noncompliance. This amendment would protect patients and strengthen the program by adding more qualified in-state producers, increasing competition, improving access, and keeping jobs and tax revenue in West Virginia. Please amend the bill so West Virginia hemp operators have a pathway into the medical edible program. We want to be part of the solution: safe products, transparent testing, and WV-grown/WV-made economic growth. Thank you for your time and for moving this legislation forward.

As a lifelong citizen of Wayne Co WV, I am asking that the leadership of our beautiful state change their decesion making process to be in line with the citizens. We are tired of bad leadership, you have allowed Wv water, air, and people to be harmed by your bad decision-making abilities. Anything that is not for. Higher water and air standards are a NO. We the citizens of WV that you work for need as a life essential clean water, clean air, and clean land. Please excuse yourself from your position if you are. against what the citizens are requesting. You should be ashamed to say that you represent a state that does not put its citizens first, citizens who have no clean water, no clean air.

I feel that hearing aids are a necessity of life that we all need at one point or another and not having help to get them would impact your emotional and financial self. Insurance should be a help to the insured, not an obstacle. I feel that if you have insurance you should have coverage to assist in getting your health taken care of no matter what that need is. Insurance has gotten to where it is not helping the insured unless they go through hoops or not at all. Insurance needs to do better!

The initial amount of $10 million is insufficient and needs to be increased to at least $250 million. The need to apply for grants should be eliminated. Fining the utilities will only result in privatization or rate increases.  Neither outcome is in the best interest of the consumers. We are in a crisis and need this funding to be available immediately.

I think it is imperative to fund clean water to these communities who have been going without for so long. It is unconscionable that it’s not already done.

I fully support the ability to add edibles for sale in Lewisburg Greenlight Dispensary.  It would be a perfect option for those who do not want to consume their medication by smoking it.  It also would provide more of a concise pain relief treatment as ingesting provides a total body calling experience

Providing tax breaks to data centers but denying urgent accessible funding to the communities and people you “serve” for CLEAN DRINKING WATER is not good representation of the people. Please do the right thing. Stop lining pockets and start protecting and saving lives.  Respectfully.

I believe west virginians should have access to edible forms of cannabis. I also believe it should be regulated like alcohol and be readily available to adults with out having to purchase a medical card. West virginia is losing MILLIONS per year to our surrounding states. The time to act is NOW!!

This bill is a gross violation of our First Amendment rights to free speech and the right to peaceably assemble. Police have a difficult job but that does not give the WV Legislature the right to violate the provisions of the U.S. Constitution. I object to all of this bill.

There is no such thing as a sacrifice zone.

Baylea Bill needs to pass. If this pass was available 14 years ago my sister would still be here alive with my family.

My name is Colin Ross, and I am a lifelong resident of Cannelton, West Virginia. My family has lived in this valley for generations, and I still live in the same home I was brought to as a newborn. I want to be clear: this is a public health emergency. The language of this bill does not reflect the urgency of what we are living with. This is not a future concern. This is happening now. Come to Cannelton. Smell the air. Look at the water. Talk to the residents. Review the citizen reports that have been submitted for years. Ask yourself honestly — would you live there? Would you raise your family there under those conditions? No community should be expected to live this way. House Bill 5525, as written, does not provide the level of urgency or funding necessary to fix this emergency. The proposed $10 million fund is not enough. The original request of $250 million must be restored to reflect the seriousness of the situation. Requiring struggling Public Service Districts to apply for grants or take on loans only delays solutions. Penalizing them with fines makes it worse. Communities like mine should not be forced to carry the financial burden of fixing a public health emergency. This bill must clearly recognize this situation for what it is — an emergency — and respond accordingly. We are not asking for special treatment. We are asking for basic protection. Clean water is not optional. It is a necessity for life. I respectfully ask the legislature to increase funding, remove barriers to access, eliminate fines, and treat this as the public health emergency that it is. Thank you.

  As a patient , I urge support for HB 5260 to allow regulated medical cannabis edibles in WV dispensaries. This would give patients safer, more accessible non-inhalable options with proper dosing controls. PLEASE advance this bill!

West Virginia is never going to improve as a state if we keep indulging the criminals. Drug addiction is a disease, but that is not an excuse to endanger other people's lives. Stricter sentencing guidelines are a must.

Yes I would love for the state of WV to allow edibles I feel there is a stronger medicinal value and is much more controllable it also takes away the long term effects on the lungs when smoked or vaped it also allows for people who are not all that comfortable smoking it

We need religious exemptions.

Edibles are a great and tasteful way to take our medicine when you cant smoke due to lung or throat issues. Regular extracts have a terrible taste that may not be good for those with nausea. Its about time we catch up to other states and stop limiting our patients.

Please do not vote this into law. If it looks like voter suppression, then maybe it is. Does this proposal suggest that elections are not secure? Another solution to a problem that simply does not exist.

This is a bill that absolutely needs to be passed so that families who WILL experience a travesty like this will get the justice they deserve!!

This bill needs to be refined if it is to help the areas that are most deeply affected. These are the things I believe should be done: 1. A vast increase in the initial amount being put in the fund you’re suggesting. $10 million may seem reasonable, but people are suffering.  $250 million would go much further. 2. Eliminate the provision for fines. Please don’t  fine struggling utilities to force them to pay for their own upgrades. They can’t afford them. 3. Eliminate the need to apply for grants and loans. This is a public health emergency. Emergency funding must be provided now. Thank you for considering the need.

We need edibles here they are the very best in customer service.

Yes I would love for gummies to come to West Virginia

Please vote yes to protect property owners against this type of fraud. Many times I see fixes for problems that don't exist. I can honestly say that this addresses a real and growing problem. Thank you.

Chairman, Vice Chairman, and Members of the Committee: Thank you for the opportunity to submit public comment in support of House Bill 5377, establishing the Burial Equity Grant Program for National Guard and Reserve servicemembers. This legislation represents an important step toward ensuring fairness, dignity, and respect for those who have served our state and nation. Purpose of the Legislation House Bill 5377 addresses a longstanding inequity by providing modest burial assistance to members of the National Guard and Reserve whose families may not receive the same level of support afforded to active-duty servicemembers. These men and women serve alongside active-duty forces in combat operations, domestic emergencies, and disaster response, yet their families can face disparities in benefits depending on duty status at the time of death. This bill ensures that service is honored equally and that families are not left to shoulder disproportionate financial burdens during a time of grief. The Need for Burial Equity Members of the Guard and Reserve play a critical role in West Virginia’s emergency preparedness and national defense. They respond to floods, public health crises, and overseas deployments, often balancing military duties with civilian careers and family responsibilities. When these servicemembers pass away, their families deserve the assurance that the state recognizes their sacrifice with dignity. Funeral and burial costs can create financial strain, and the absence of equitable support can compound emotional hardship. HB 5377 provides a practical solution by offering targeted assistance to close this gap. Fiscal Considerations The proposed Burial Equity Grant Program represents a modest and manageable investment relative to the state budget. The fiscal impact is minimal, yet the benefit to families and communities is significant. Providing burial assistance is a cost-effective way to demonstrate the state’s commitment to servicemembers while helping prevent financial hardship that could otherwise require additional forms of public support. This legislation reflects responsible stewardship of taxpayer resources while fulfilling a moral obligation. Impact on Military Families and Readiness Equitable benefits contribute to morale and reinforce trust among servicemembers and their families. When Guard and Reserve members know their service will be honored equally, it strengthens confidence in state leadership and supports recruitment and retention. West Virginia relies heavily on its National Guard and Reserve forces for emergency response and community resilience. Policies that demonstrate respect for their service help maintain a strong and ready force. Alignment with West Virginia Values West Virginians have a proud tradition of military service and community support. Establishing a burial equity grant program reflects the state’s core values of honoring sacrifice, supporting families, and doing what is right. HB 5377 sends a clear message that every individual who answered the call to serve is valued equally, regardless of component status. Conclusion House Bill 5377 is a compassionate, fiscally responsible, and necessary measure that corrects an inequity affecting National Guard and Reserve families. By passing this legislation, the Committee and the Legislature will reaffirm West Virginia’s commitment to honoring all who serve with fairness and dignity. Thank you for your consideration and for your continued support of West Virginia’s servicemembers, veterans, and their families.  

The current sentencing for this crime is a joke. These changes should've happened long before now! Do better!! Although nothing will bring this beautiful young woman back, the least you could do is see to it that no other family has to experience this slap to the face!

I myself dont enjoy smoking and would love the opportunity to get edibles.

I am writing to strongly support passage of HB 5345, for multiple reasons.  Sufficient good, safe and reliable childcare in our state is essential for our State's continued economic growth.  When good workers are shut out of employment opportunities because there are insufficient resources for good, reliable and safe child care, the State suffers.  Those same workers also find themselves penalized through no fault of their own, essentially being penalized economically for choosing to give priority to ensuring their children have good, reliable and safe child care, even if that means a parent, who is then removed from the work force.  If West Virginia were to be known as a state that prioritizes the care of its children, that promotes opportunities for currently disenfranchised workers to remain, or become, part of our State's work force, it can only enhance our reputation as a state with good policies aimed at making the best workers available for employers and a good location for new businesses.  When children have good, safe and reliable care, they flourish, their families flourish, and the spill-over to the State is the strengthening of the family unit -  a win-win for everyone.

SB 704 is designed to protect veterans and their families from predatory practices by unaccredited, for-profit companies that charge fees for assistance with VA disability claims. These companies — often referred to as “claim sharks” — have increasingly targeted veterans while lobbying policymakers with misleading claims about their role and value. Evidence from veterans organizations, consumer protection officials, and federal guidance demonstrates that many industry talking points misrepresent the risks and overlook the extensive free, accredited assistance already available. Supporting SB 704 would align West Virginia with best practices to safeguard veterans’ earned benefits and prevent financial exploitation. Background Federal law requires individuals assisting veterans with disability compensation claims to be accredited through the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs to ensure training, ethical standards, and oversight. Free assistance is widely available through accredited Veterans Service Organizations such as the Veterans of Foreign Wars and the American Legion, as well as state veteran service officers with the West Virginia Department of Veterans Assistance in locations across West Virginia. SB 704 reinforces these protections by limiting compensation for unaccredited claims assistance and strengthening consumer safeguards. Why SB 704 Is Necessary 1. Industry Lobbyists Misrepresent Their Services Claim: Companies only provide consulting or education. Fact: Many firms use semantic distinctions to avoid accreditation while still guiding veterans through claims preparation and charging significant fees. Activity — not terminology — determines consumer risk. Relevance to SB 704: The bill closes loopholes that allow companies to avoid oversight through rebranding. 2. Paid Services Are Not Needed Claim: Veterans must pay for help because the system is too complex. Fact: Accredited assistance is available at no cost through VSOs and government offices with trained professionals accountable to federal standards. Relevance to SB 704: The legislation reinforces the role of trusted, free assistance rather than allowing unregulated alternatives. 3. Promises of Higher Ratings Are Misleading Claim: Companies help veterans obtain higher disability ratings. Fact: No entity can guarantee a rating increase, and such claims are widely cited as predatory marketing tactics. Relevance to SB 704: The bill helps prevent misleading claims that could pressure veterans into costly contracts. 4. “Freedom of Choice” Without Safeguards Leads to Harm Claim: Veterans should be free to hire paid consultants. Fact: Some contracts require thousands of dollars in fees or a share of future benefits, which can significantly reduce the value of earned compensation. Relevance to SB 704: The bill ensures consumer protections so veterans are not financially exploited. 5. Documented Harm to Veterans Claim: The industry fills a harmless gap. Fact: Reports from veterans organizations and consumer protection officials document financial loss, aggressive sales tactics, and misleading contracts. Relevance to SB 704: Strengthening protections addresses documented risks rather than hypothetical concerns. 6. Enforcement Gaps Are Being Exploited Claim: Companies operate legally because enforcement is limited. Fact: Federal officials have issued warnings to numerous unaccredited firms, demonstrating ongoing compliance concerns. Relevance to SB 704: The legislation provides clearer standards and enforcement tools at the state level. Policy Benefits of SB 704 Supporting SB 704 would:

• Protect veterans from excessive fees and misleading contracts
• Reinforce the role of accredited, free assistance
• Align state policy with federal accreditation standards
• Reduce financial exploitation of earned benefits
• Improve transparency and accountability
• Demonstrate West Virginia’s commitment to veterans and their families

Broader Context States across the country are adopting similar consumer protection measures in response to growing concerns about predatory practices in the veterans benefits space. By advancing SB 704, policymakers in West Virginia can ensure veterans’ benefits remain protected and that assistance is provided ethically and responsibly. Conclusion The central question is not whether veterans deserve help navigating the benefits system — they unquestionably do. The question is whether unaccredited, fee-based actors should be allowed to profit from earned benefits without strong safeguards. Evidence from veterans organizations, regulators, and consumer protection officials demonstrates clear risks associated with unregulated claims consulting. SB 704 provides a balanced, commonsense approach that prioritizes veterans’ financial security and access to trusted assistance. For these reasons, I urge you to pass SB 704!

As a United Methodist Pastor, I am very concerned about the ongoing public health crisis in our southern coalfields. Throughout scripture access to clean drinking water is prioritized by God, as seen from Moses bringing forth water from the rock, to Jesus meeting people at the well, to Paul's letters continually reminding us to give water to the thirsty. And yet, our citizens are provided water that burns their skin, stains their clothing, and is not safe to drink. I am grateful that this bill is being brought forth, but the changes that have been made to it are unacceptable. In the United Methodist tradition, access to clean water is recognized as a human right. West Virginians deserve clean water. This is absolutely a public health EMERGENCY. We need this bill to increase the initial amount being put into the fund to at least $250 million. $10 million is not enough to solve the problems of the impacted infrastructure. The provision for fines must be eliminated. Struggling utilities need help, not punishment for problems they are unable to solve. This problem has been a result of many issues over decades--many caused by corporations, not the populace. The people cannot afford to fund the fees that would be charged to their utility providers, which cannot even provide clean water. The provision that requires applications for grants and loans is an undue burden intended to limit access to needed funds. The provision must, therefore, be removed. This is a public health emergency. Emergency funding must be provided now.

Let’s get edibles in West Virginia!!!

Please do not pass this proposed legislation. If elections are fair and secure why is this needed for an unknown number of persons affixing a "unique" mark? What if the mark isn't that unique and other very similar marks appear? Could that raise questions? Current election rules make it impossible to identify anyone from a ballot they cast. If a person chose to use a mark on their ballot similar to an owned brand, trademark, logo or other known associative symbol could that possibly lead to identifying a voter? Every ballot for a precinct is then publicly available on a state web site. I personally do not want my ballot published publicly, even if my name or other identifier is not attached to it. Public publication undermines the spirit of keeping my ballot private and election decisions personal.

Cannabis is helpful to so many in pain but there are those that due to breathing issues are unable to find relief. Edibles are a safe and easy to consume and will allow pain relief for so many,  please take this into consideration when reviewing this bill.

Edibles are a method by which to consume the numerous benefits of medical marijuana for those who do not want to or cannot ingest via inhalation.

Allowing marijuana edibles in licensed medical dispensaries is a practical, compassionate step that prioritizes patient health while maintaining strong public safety standards. Many medical patients—such as those undergoing cancer treatment, managing chronic pain, or living with severe gastrointestinal conditions—cannot tolerate smoking or vaporizing cannabis, making edibles a safer, longer-lasting alternative. Concerns about children mistaking edibles for candy are valid, but they can be effectively addressed through strict regulations: child-resistant packaging, clear THC labeling, limits on shapes and colors that mimic commercial sweets, and secure in-store dispensing by trained staff. States that already permit regulated edible sales have implemented these safeguards successfully, demonstrating that thoughtful policy can reduce risk while expanding access. By approving edibles within a tightly controlled medical framework, lawmakers can both protect children and ensure that vulnerable patients have safe, dignified treatment options prescribed and monitored by professionals.

1. A vast increase in the initial amount of $10 million to $250 million 2. Eliminate the provision for fines. You can't fine struggling utilities to essentially force them to pay for their own upgrades, it reads as forced privatization or inevitable rate increases. 3. Eliminate the need to apply for grants and loans. This is a public health emergency. 4. This bill must define the metrics for determining which systems are "rural" or "underserved". 5. This bill must define specific scientific research referenced for setting maximum contaminant levels beyond the EPA, as already referenced in the original bill. 6. Although lead contamination should remain a priority, the state's most significant contaminants are PFAs (Occurrence of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances and inorganic analytes in groundwater and surface water used as sources for public water supply in West Virginia) and nitrate (EWG Tap Water Database | West Virginia), indicating the emergent need for speedy implementation of existing projects. +-

I feel edibles would be great for those who can't smoke. Also would help greatly with pain as well. Thank you & pray can start getting them just cause some people with COPD & edibles are better for people with cancer.

Why would anyone vote against requiring DATA centers to have complete transparency on water usage? We have had a drought in the state the last two years and how many communities don't even have clean drinking water. I don't know what benefits these DATA centers will bring to the state. They will only provide a very few jobs, take up acres of land, use exorbitant amounts of water, cause noise pollution, light up our beautiful night skies with light pollution and use exorbitant amounts of electricity which will make our electric bills go up even more. So I ask, what do the people of this state get out of having DATA centers here?

Why would anyone vote against requiring DATA centers to have complete transparency on water usage? We have had a drought in the state the last two years and how many communities don't even have clean drinking water. I don't know what benefits these DATA centers will bring to the state. They will only provide a very few jobs, take up acres of land, use exorbitant amounts of water, cause noise pollution, light up our beautiful night skies with light pollution and use exorbitant amounts of electricity which will make our electric bills go up even more. So I ask, what do the people of this state get out of having DATA centers here?

There should be edibles in the dispensary

As a Teacher of the visually Impaired, we are so limited for our students curriculums, adaptations and ability to have opportunities every other student has daily. As families in our state and county children with hearing impairments struggle to afford groceries, how do we expect them to get hearing evaluations, and then hearing aids if needed ( costing upward of 2500-5000.00.) Please consider passing this bill and allowing funding for not only our hearing impaired population but additional funding for our blind and low vision. Braillers, Braille paper, canes and adaptive technology and devices cost thousands and a normal household cannot afford all that is needed and required for a child’s success emotionally, and academically

I respectfully but strongly urge revisions to HB 5525 on behalf of the communities of the southern West Virginia coalfields. While the bill acknowledges a serious public health crisis, its current provisions fall far short of what is needed. First, the proposed $10 million initial investment is inadequate. Addressing decades of infrastructure failure requires a meaningful commitment, and we continue to request an initial allocation of $250 million. Second, the provision allowing fines should be removed—struggling utilities cannot be penalized into compliance without worsening the problem. Finally, this legislation must recognize the situation as a public health emergency. Emergency conditions require immediate, direct funding—not delayed relief through grant and loan applications. The people of the southern coalfields need action now. Respectfully, Mike Estep

I am a resident of Bluewell and a constituent of delegate Gearheart. These are some changes that are absolutely necessary to ensure we actually address this issue: 1. A vast increase in the initial amount being put in the fund they're creating...$10 million doesn't do anything. We still want $250 million 2. Eliminate the provision for fines. You can't fine struggling utilities to force them to pay for their own upgrades with money they don't have. 3. Eliminate the need to apply for grants and loans. This is a public health emergency. Emergency funding must be provided now

As a registered medical cannabis patient in West Virginia, I support expanding the program to include regulated edibles for safer, non-inhalable options. Since developing asthma in 2026, inhalation methods like vaporizing dry leaf (the main accessible form) have become risky and aggravating to my lungs. Smoking is already prohibited, and while patients can make edibles at home using oils or tinctures, this is impractical: it requires expertise in dosing and infusion, risks inconsistent potency or contamination, and lacks the safety of professional manufacturing, testing, and labeling. Many other states allow regulated edibles, which provide reliable, sustained relief without respiratory harm—especially important for patients like me with breathing issues. Recent bills like Senate Bill 892 (introduced February 2026) and House Bill 5260 aim to authorize licensed processors to produce and dispensaries to sell edibles, with strong safeguards: Bureau approval per product, food safety compliance, child-resistant packaging, clear labeling, max 10 mg THC per serving (with limited variance), and no appealing shapes or marketing to minors. Amending the Medical Cannabis Act (§16A-3-2 on forms and §16A-3-3 on unlawful use) to include these regulated edibles would improve patient safety, access, and health outcomes while keeping strict controls and prohibiting smoking or recreational use. I urge the Legislature to pass this change to better serve patients with respiratory conditions and align with evidence-based medical cannabis practices. Thank you for your consideration.

Hello. As a patient of medical marijuana in the hreat state of West By God. The pros of having edibles would vastly outweigh the cons. Older patients with more sensitive lungs would benefit immensely

I strongly oppose HB 4712 in its current form. While "Baylea's Law" is undoubtedly well-intentioned, the proposed sentencing of 5 to 30 years is excessive and creates a dangerous legal overlap with second-degree murder, which traditionally requires a finding of malice. A more balanced approach would increase the minimum sentence to five years while maintaining the current 15-year maximum, thereby aligning the penalty with existing voluntary manslaughter laws. Furthermore, the proposed fines are disproportionately low for a felony involving a loss of life; instead of a nominal increase to $6,000, the legislature should implement significant financial penalties ranging from $10,000 to $100,000. Under WV Code §61-11A-4, a mandatory portion of these increased funds should be designated as direct restitution to the victim’s estate to provide meaningful support. True reform must also acknowledge that West Virginia lacks a comprehensive statutory Dram Shop Act, forcing victims to rely on the limited criminal provisions of WV Code §60-3A-25. We must hold businesses and inexperienced bartenders accountable for over-serving patrons who may be unaware of their own level of impairment, rather than solely focusing on a punitive 30-year sentence that undermines the rehabilitative purpose of our justice system.

Please pass this bill!

I am writing to respectfully express my opposition to House Bill 5053. This bill is based on the assumption that families who file a Notice of Intent to homeschool during a truancy process are simply seeking an “easy out.” That premise overlooks the reality that some students with absences are experiencing serious issues such as bullying, unsafe environments, or mental health struggles. In these cases, requiring continued attendance could cause real harm. Current West Virginia law already provides a balanced solution. Superintendents have the authority to petition the court if a homeschooling decision is not in the best interest of the child. That process preserves due process and allows for individualized review. House Bill 5053 instead creates a blanket restriction that removes flexibility and may negatively impact vulnerable students. Additionally, the bill unfairly targets homeschooling while leaving other education alternatives untouched, raising equal protection concerns. Its language is also vague, particularly regarding when the “pre-petition process” begins, which invites inconsistent application. Truancy is an important issue, but solutions should protect student well-being, preserve due process, and avoid overbroad restrictions. I respectfully urge you to reconsider House Bill 5053 in its current form. Thank you for your time and service to our state.

This law needs passed to ensure the safety of our citizens and community. Destany's sentencing was a slap on the wrist while Baylea's family will suffer the rest of their lives. Destany's sentence was a disgrace to our community and disrespectful to Baylea's name. She did not deserve to die due to someone else's negligence. This a law needs passed to prevent this from happening again. We should not let Baylea die in vain.

This will help many families.

I think so because this planet has made more money for the state plus it’s easier for the ones that can’t smoke it like myself

Please pass house bill 4712. It’s time we hold people accountable.  In 2016, my 11 year old daughter and I were hit head on by a drunk driver when leaving my brother’s wedding rehearsal.  Thankfully, we both walked away with our lives still intact.  This was not the drunk drivers first offense, yet, he was given a smack on the hand and was back out on the road within a week.  Our whole lives almost changed in an instant.  Drunk driving has affected so many families not just Baylea’s.  If we have stricter laws, maybe, just maybe, people would stop and think a little harder before they step into a vehicle while intoxicated. Let protect innocent lives.  Thank you!

I support this bill. This is no different than alternate paths to teaching or other careers.  This bill would simply allow someone to sit for the bar exam if he or she possesses a graduate degree.  If someone has the knowledge to pass the exam, why prohibit this?

I do like this bill but what if they the law has good information on a crime being done on private property.