Public Comments

2026 Regular Session SB66 (Government Organization)

Comment by: marquele barnes on February 13, 2026 23:48

This bill is more efficient and the pros out weight the cons.

2026 Regular Session SB390 (Government Organization)

Comment by: marquele barnes on February 13, 2026 23:43

This is a great bill to be passed. I feel like there isn't many cons to this.

2026 Regular Session HB4712 (Judiciary)

Comment by: Julie Seagraves on February 13, 2026 22:59

There needs to be tougher penalties for taking a life. The minimum penalty definitely deserves to be longer, and actually enforced.

2026 Regular Session HB4712 (Judiciary)

Comment by: Jessica on February 13, 2026 22:46

To pass Baylea's law! Because she didnt deserve what had happened to her! Especially with the trial atleast give her some justice! The family and friends are so devastated because her life was taken that day! And even more when the defendant basically gotten off scott free with 6 to 12 months of house arrest and in a program!

2026 Regular Session HB4712 (Judiciary)

Comment by: Wayne G Long on February 13, 2026 22:25

This bill is needed to impose stricter penalties for people getting behind the wheel under the influence of alcohol and/or drugs not only risking their lives and others as well. Please pass the bill 🙏 🙏 🙏

2026 Regular Session HB4712 (Judiciary)

Comment by: Trais on February 13, 2026 22:16

I fully support this law being passed. When someone chooses to drive drunk and takes a life, it’s not just a mistake, it’s a decision with irreversible consequences. Families are left grieving forever, while the person responsible often faces far less than the lifetime sentence the victims’ loved ones endure. Increasing penalties sends a clear message that these choices will have serious consequences. We must hold offenders fully accountable.

2026 Regular Session HB4712 (Judiciary)

Comment by: Lana Cook on February 13, 2026 21:47

Please pass this bill

2026 Regular Session HB4712 (Judiciary)

Comment by: Bradley Brown on February 13, 2026 21:20

I, Bradley L. Brown, do agree with the following newly requested law by the Craig Family. Upon this law, it shall make people consider making such a decision as to where peoples lives can be jeopardized and/or resulted into a serious life altering injury. Enforcing a more strict law, with more consequences to a reckless decision of an individual that is impaired by any substance which will cause the mind to be altered/affected enough to not allow the person to operate any Vehicle/Machinery without being aware of any dangerous potential of injury, or have the ability to have control of any emergency situation. This request is absolutely valid, and should be recognized by authorities!

2026 Regular Session HB4712 (Judiciary)

Comment by: Alyssa Lail on February 13, 2026 20:46

Driving under the influence is a choice. When that choice results in someone’s death, the consequences should reflect the true severity of that loss. No family should have to bury a loved one because of a preventable decision. The pain and lifelong impact on victims’ families cannot be measured, and it far outweighs a lenient sentence. Increasing the penalty for DUI causing death honors the value of the life taken and reinforces that these tragedies demand real accountability and justice.

2026 Regular Session HB5260 (Health and Human Resources)

Comment by: Andre Dent on February 13, 2026 20:20

Having access to safe & legal edibles would be a game changer. Especially for those like myself who would enjoy an alternative that isn't going to harm your lungs.

2026 Regular Session HB5260 (Health and Human Resources)

Comment by: Zachery McConnell on February 13, 2026 20:07

This would be an amazing help for the people who have asthma or black lung and provide a healthier choice over vaping.

2026 Regular Session HB4712 (Judiciary)

Comment by: Sandi Barnett on February 13, 2026 20:06

This bill definitely needs to happen...#justiceforbaylea

2026 Regular Session HB4712 (Judiciary)

Comment by: Allison Boling on February 13, 2026 19:31

Protecting West Virginian citizens should be a priority, but with the recent judge ruling regarding Baylea Bower has set a precedent amongst residents. West Virginians are losing faith for the state’s judicial system. DUIs are a serious matter, especially when individuals are left seriously injured or worse. Light sentences do nothing to prevent DUI crashes - harsher jail time and raised fines are a perfectly reasonable deterrent. Yes, mistakes do happen, but mistakes have consequences. That’s why I implore our states House and Senate to consider this bill. Protect West Virginians and prevent other families from enduring what the Bower family is currently enduring. They are left grieving a young woman who should still be alive, and the woman who did this received a light sentencing. It’s not right nor is it acceptable. Things need to change or more innocent lives will continue to be ruined.

2026 Regular Session HB5260 (Health and Human Resources)

Comment by: Andrea McKinney on February 13, 2026 19:25

Edible medical marijuana products should be available. This would seem like a safer consumption route rather than inhaling vapors into your lungs.

2026 Regular Session HB5260 (Health and Human Resources)

Comment by: Matthew B Cole on February 13, 2026 19:16

I support this bill. Edible cannabis is better suited for some people.

2026 Regular Session HB5528 (Judiciary)

Comment by: Jayli Flynn on February 13, 2026 19:15

I oppose HB 5528 because it creates new, special legal protections for law-enforcement and certain officials without first demonstrating that West Virginia has achieved baseline transparency, accountability, and effective discipline in policing—and because West Virginia already has an existing address-protection framework in law. 1) HB 5528 expands special protections for a class of officials, while public accountability remains weak HB 5528 would add §61-2-31 to prohibit government entities from knowingly disclosing a “covered individual’s” home street address and certain phone numbers on publicly accessible records, and it creates a civil remedy (injunction, actual damages, and attorney fees/costs). Public safety matters. But policy must also reflect public accountability—especially when the state is adding more “special rules” for law-enforcement. 2) West Virginia already has Daniel’s Law protecting this information West Virginia already has Daniel’s Law (W. Va. Code §5A-8-24) protecting personal information for judicial officers, prosecutors, and law-enforcement officers (with civil enforcement provisions). If the Legislature believes current protections are not being implemented consistently, the solution should be compliance and enforcement of existing law—plus transparent reporting—rather than layering a second, overlapping statute that may create confusion across agencies and databases. (HB 5528 is also unusually narrow for judges/prosecutors by focusing on “retired” categories in its definition of “covered individual.”) 3) WV data shows a serious accountability gap: many force/misconduct incidents, relatively few disciplinary actions The ACLU of West Virginia’s 2020 Police Misconduct Report (built from WV FOIA requests) reports:

Use-of-force incidents (92 agencies reporting): 665 (2015), 738 (2016), 723 (2017), 899 (2018), 966 (2019)
Formal complaints of misconduct (91 agencies reporting): 204 (2015), 173 (2016), 198 (2017), 134 (2018), 152 (2019)
Only 47% of complaints resulted in a review
Total disciplinary actions (2015–2019): 243
The report highlights a stark ratio: “16 times as many use-of-force incidents as disciplinary actions.”
It also reports that the WV State Police had more misconduct complaints than all other responding agencies combined in 2015 and 2016.

These are not “anti-police” talking points—this is WV data collected through open records. When discipline is this comparatively rare, it is not responsible to keep adding new legal shields for law enforcement without pairing them with enforceable public protections and oversight. 4) WV has had recent, documented law-enforcement scandals and confirmed wrongdoing Recent reporting on the West Virginia State Police scandal describes allegations ranging from purchasing-rule circumvention (“ghost accounts”) to misuse of purchasing cards, overtime abuse, and other misconduct—along with confirmed allegations including theft by troopers from an individual at Mardi Gras Casino (2021). Separately, reporting shows a former Wheeling police officer / drug task force commander pleaded guilty to stealing more than $75,000 from task force funds (federal-program theft charge), including a stated total of $75,124.44. And federal cases show that West Virginia law-enforcement officers have faced federal civil-rights and excessive-force charges/sentences (examples include DOJ announcements of indictments and sentencing in WV). Given this context, expanding special protections for law enforcement—without expanding independent oversight—moves WV in the wrong direction. 5) Equity problem: more protections for the state, fewer for residents HB 5528 is a one-way policy: it increases legal protections for a defined group of officials, while ordinary West Virginians who face profiling, harassment, retaliation, or revenue-driven enforcement do not receive parallel safeguards (such as consistent, independent complaint review; transparent discipline reporting; limits on secrecy; or meaningful remedies when harmed). When the public is asked to accept reduced transparency in the name of “safety,” the Legislature should also provide public safety from abuse of power through strong accountability systems. What I’m asking the Legislature to do

Vote NO on HB 5528 as drafted.
If the bill is considered at all, amend it to include public accountability requirements, such as:

Mandatory annual reporting by agencies on: number of redaction requests granted/denied, databases impacted, and response times (so “privacy” doesn’t become an untracked secrecy tool).
A requirement that agencies publish discipline and complaint outcomes in aggregate (no personal addresses needed) so residents can see whether misconduct is being addressed.
A parallel pathway for ordinary residents facing credible threats (e.g., stalking/domestic violence survivors) to request similar removal of home addresses from public-facing databases—so this isn’t an “officials-only” protection.

West Virginia already has Daniel’s Law. The problem is not the lack of statutes—it’s the lack of consistent transparency and accountability.

2026 Regular Session HB5491 (Government Organization)

Comment by: Troy Osborne on February 13, 2026 19:14

Hi, Having open captioning on movies is a great accessibility for wide diversity of audiences including seniors, children, and adults. We are looking forward to welcoming all of them and sharing our inclusion and support with them. Thank you. Sincerely, Troy Osborne

2026 Regular Session HB5397 (Finance)

Comment by: Matthew B Cole on February 13, 2026 19:13

I oppose this bill. Other types of hobbies are not exempt from sales tax; neither should gun accessories be exempt.

2026 Regular Session HB5260 (Health and Human Resources)

Comment by: Emma bostick on February 13, 2026 19:10

I support this bill!!

2026 Regular Session HB4712 (Judiciary)

Comment by: Jenna Ford on February 13, 2026 19:09

Baylea was a wonderful person . A person who would do anything for anyone. She tragically lost her life due to the ignorance of a dunk and high adult who had got away with a slap on the wrist. Baylea and her family did not get justice but we will continue to speak her name. Please pass this bill to insure harsher consequences to individuals who choose to make poor choices that take someone else’s life.

2026 Regular Session HB5525 (Energy and Public Works)

Comment by: Jayli Flynn on February 13, 2026 19:09

While HB 5525 acknowledges serious drinking water infrastructure and contamination concerns in designated southern West Virginia counties, the bill’s geographically limited scope raises concerns about equity, consistency, and statewide public health protection. Independent reporting has documented that West Virginia ranks among the highest in the nation for public water system health-based violations, affecting communities across the state — not only the counties named in this bill. Data compiled through EPA reporting and investigative journalism shows that infrastructure failures, contaminant exceedances, and capacity issues impact small and large systems statewide. If enhanced monitoring, infrastructure upgrades, and additional funding are necessary to protect residents in certain counties, the Legislature should clearly articulate the objective criteria used to exclude other communities facing documented violations and similar infrastructure deficiencies. Public health protections should not depend on geography. Safe drinking water is a statewide necessity under both federal Safe Drinking Water Act standards and existing West Virginia public health law. A regional approach risks creating unequal regulatory protection for residents in counties experiencing comparable contamination or aging system failures. Rather than limiting enhanced oversight and investment to a defined region, lawmakers should consider: • Establishing uniform statewide minimum monitoring and reporting standards • Creating a needs-based funding formula driven by violation data and infrastructure age • Ensuring transparent criteria for eligibility so all affected communities are treated equitably Water quality challenges in West Virginia are systemic. Addressing them through geographically narrow legislation does not provide consistent protection for all taxpayers and residents. For these reasons, I respectfully oppose HB 5525 in its current form and urge consideration of a statewide, data-driven water infrastructure and monitoring reform approach.

2026 Regular Session HB5260 (Health and Human Resources)

Comment by: Landon Plank on February 13, 2026 19:09

Edibles, yes. Please! We need them!

2026 Regular Session HB5260 (Health and Human Resources)

Comment by: Emily Moore on February 13, 2026 19:05

Edibles would be great for people with things like astma, copd, and black lung. Definitely want to see them in dispensaries.

2026 Regular Session HB5520 (Judiciary)

Comment by: Jayli Flynn on February 13, 2026 19:05

I respectfully submit this comment in opposition to HB 5520. HB 5520 creates a “Foreign Adversary Contracting Prohibition Act,” a “Foreign Adversary and Terrorist Agent Registration Act,” and a “Transnational Repression Act” within West Virginia Code. While framed as a state procurement and ethics measure, the bill imports national-security terminology traditionally governed at the federal level. Under the U.S. Constitution, foreign affairs authority is vested primarily in the federal government (Article I, Section 8; Article II; Supremacy Clause, Article VI). The U.S. Supreme Court has held that states may not intrude into foreign policy in ways that conflict with federal authority (Zschernig v. Miller, 389 U.S. 429 (1968)). Federal agencies such as the U.S. Department of Treasury (OFAC), the U.S. Department of Commerce, and the U.S. Department of Justice already regulate sanctions, export controls, and foreign agent registration at the national level. HB 5520 risks duplicating or overlapping with existing federal enforcement systems. When states create parallel foreign-adversary registries or prohibitions, they risk:

Federal preemption challenges if state enforcement conflicts with federal determinations.
Vagueness concerns if definitions of “foreign adversary” or “foreign agent” are not tightly aligned with federal law.
Compliance burdens on local businesses, universities, and contractors who already must comply with federal sanctions and disclosure rules.

Additionally, procurement restrictions must be applied carefully to avoid Equal Protection concerns under the Fourteenth Amendment. Any law referencing “foreign adversaries” must clearly distinguish between foreign governments or sanctioned entities and individuals of particular national origin. State law must avoid even the appearance of nationality-based discrimination. Beyond constitutional considerations, there is also a question of legislative prioritization. West Virginia faces pressing state-level issues including infrastructure, public health, water quality, workforce development, and economic opportunity. Federal agencies already manage national security determinations and foreign sanctions enforcement. Expanding state code into areas closely tied to federal geopolitical disputes may not be the most effective use of limited session time and taxpayer resources. If the Legislature wishes to address procurement transparency, it could do so by:

Explicitly incorporating federal sanctions lists rather than creating independent state determinations.
Narrowly tailoring definitions to align directly with federal designations.
Including clear anti-discrimination safeguards.

For these reasons, I urge careful reconsideration or amendment of HB 5520 to ensure it remains within traditional state authority, avoids constitutional ambiguity, and prioritizes core state governance responsibilities.

2026 Regular Session HB5519 (Finance)

Comment by: Jayli Flynn on February 13, 2026 19:01

I oppose House Bill 5519 (the so-called West Virginia Tax Neutrality Act) on the following factual policy grounds and conflicting public interest concerns: 1. The bill risks significant revenue loss at a time West Virginia faces budget pressures HB 5519 would exclude most capital gains from West Virginia taxable income — effectively reducing the state’s income tax base. This occurs despite documented budget shortfalls and fiscal caution highlighted in recent state budget negotiations, including vetoes by the governor to preserve budgetary stability. Reducing the tax base in this manner may undercut funding for essential public services (education, health, infrastructure) without a clear replacement revenue stream. 2. The tax changes primarily benefit high-income individuals and investors Capital gains exclusions tend to disproportionately benefit taxpayers with significant investment income. This tends to shift more of the tax burden onto wage-earning residents with little to no investment income — which contradicts equitable tax policy principles and may exacerbate inequality. No independent economic impact study has been publicly released demonstrating broad benefits or revenue neutrality. 3. Conflicts with public accountability given financial histories of leading proponents a. Jim Justice

In public court filings, Justice agreed to pay more than $5 million in overdue federal income taxes going back to 2009, and IRS liens totaling over $8 million were recorded against him and his wife for unpaid taxes.
Forbes reported his personal net worth fell below zero due to liabilities exceeding assets, and historical financial disputes involving businesses he owns include large judgments for unpaid bills.

Given this context, a proposal that reduces tax liabilities on substantial investment gains raises legitimate concerns about whether the policy is tailored to benefit individuals with significant asset holdings rather than the broader population. b. Patrick Morrisey

Governor Morrisey has publicly advocated additional income tax cuts and tax relief measures.
Independent analysts have noted that proposals to shift away from a progressive income tax toward broader exclusions would primarily benefit higher-income taxpayers and risk destabilizing the tax structure.

These financial contexts are relevant in assessing whether such tax policy reflects broad public interest or disproportionately favors specific economic actors. 4. Lack of transparency and absent economic impact analysis HB 5519 lacks an accompanying fiscal note or independent economic impact study demonstrating how the capital gains exclusions would affect:

State revenue projections
Education, healthcare, and infrastructure funding
Tax fairness across income levels

Without transparent impact analysis, the bill would advance a major tax change without evidence supporting its purported neutrality. Conclusion For these reasons, I oppose House Bill 5519:

It likely erodes the state tax base,
It favors wealthier taxpayers at the expense of working families,
It is advanced by public officials with documented personal and corporate tax controversies, and
It lacks independent economic justification.

I respectfully request that legislators vote against HB 5519 and instead pursue tax policy reforms backed by transparent analysis and equitable treatment for all West Virginians.

2026 Regular Session HB4177 (Finance)

Comment by: Brian Powell on February 13, 2026 19:00

This bill unfairly transfers the burden of taxation to younger West Virginia families. I oppose it. Property should be taxed equitably regardless of its owner's age.

2026 Regular Session HB5514 (Energy and Public Works)

Comment by: Jayli Flynn on February 13, 2026 18:57

I respectfully oppose HB 5514. HB 5514 seeks to prohibit mandatory participation by West Virginia in the federal Real ID Act of 2005 (Public Law 109-13), declaring it unconstitutional under the Tenth Amendment. While states may decline to use state resources to enforce certain federal programs, federal law remains supreme under Article VI, Clause 2 of the U.S. Constitution (the Supremacy Clause). States do not have authority to nullify federal statutes through unilateral declaration; constitutional challenges must be resolved in federal court. The Real ID Act establishes minimum security standards for state-issued driver’s licenses and identification cards when used for federal purposes, such as boarding federally regulated commercial aircraft and entering secure federal facilities. If West Virginia restricts or impairs compliance, residents could face practical consequences, including reduced access to federally regulated services and travel disruptions. Currently, West Virginia offers both Real ID-compliant and non-compliant licenses. Participation is already optional for residents. Therefore, HB 5514 appears unnecessary from a consumer choice standpoint and risks creating confusion or administrative instability within the Division of Motor Vehicles. Additionally, implementation of Real ID standards has already required substantial administrative investment. Reversing or restricting compliance could create fiscal inefficiencies, legal uncertainty, and potential conflicts between state and federal systems. Public policy should provide clarity and stability for residents, not introduce uncertainty regarding identification validity for federal purposes. For these reasons, I oppose HB 5514.

2026 Regular Session HB5397 (Finance)

Comment by: Brian Powell on February 13, 2026 18:54

I oppose this bill. My hobbies aren't exempt from sales tax. Gun enthusiasts' shouldn't be either.

2026 Regular Session HB5508 (Finance)

Comment by: Jayli Flynn on February 13, 2026 18:54

House Bill 5508 proposes to amend West Virginia Code §15-2A to include members of the Division of Protection Services in the State Police Retirement System Plan B. Plan B is a defined-benefit retirement plan established specifically for State Police members. Defined-benefit plans create long-term pension obligations that are funded through employee contributions, employer contributions (paid by the state), and investment returns. Expanding eligibility to a new class of employees increases the number of beneficiaries participating in that system. Unlike standard Public Employees Retirement System (PERS) participation, State Police Plan B is structured as a law-enforcement retirement tier with enhanced provisions. Expanding participation therefore increases long-term actuarial obligations of that system. This bill does not, within its text, identify:

A dedicated funding source to offset expanded eligibility,
A specific actuarial impact analysis,
Or a revenue-neutral mechanism to absorb increased liabilities.

Pension expansions are not one-time costs. They create ongoing obligations that extend decades into the future. If actuarial assumptions do not meet projections, employer contributions must increase to maintain system solvency. Because employer contributions are paid through state funds, any long-term funding shortfall ultimately affects future budgets and taxpayers. During this legislative session, multiple bills have addressed increases in compensation, commissions, or retirement structures for various law enforcement categories. HB 5508 continues that broader policy trend of expanding law enforcement retirement eligibility. Public safety professionals play an important role in state operations. However, responsible fiscal policy requires transparency regarding:

The actuarial cost of expansion,
The long-term impact on system solvency,
Contribution rate adjustments,
And generational fiscal sustainability.

Without a clearly published actuarial analysis and identified funding mechanism, expanding eligibility to a higher-cost retirement tier raises legitimate fiscal concerns about long-term obligations that will be borne by future state budgets. For these reasons, I urge careful review and full fiscal transparency before passage of HB 5508.

2026 Regular Session HB5423 (Judiciary)

Comment by: Brian Powell on February 13, 2026 18:52

Shame on Del. Funkhouser and co-sponsors of this bill for hiding changes to remove high school and college IDs in this unrelated bill. Aside from that, barring recognition of drivers licenses issues by other states without a public safety reason is bad policy. A person's immigration status has no bearing on their ability to operate a motor vehicle. In the event there were to be a collision involving an undocumented immigrant, this bill would just make it harder for any other person involved (including West Virginians) to pursue claims. This is a bad bill. Vote it down.

2026 Regular Session HB5507 (Judiciary)

Comment by: Jayli Flynn on February 13, 2026 18:48

I respectfully oppose HB 5507 for the following factual and structural reasons: 1️⃣ An Article V Convention Is Constitutionally Uncharted Territory Article V of the U.S. Constitution provides for a convention called by two-thirds of the states (34), but:

No Article V convention has ever occurred in U.S. history.
There are no judicial precedents defining:
- How delegates are apportioned
- Whether a convention can be limited by topic
- Whether states can legally bind or recall delegates mid-convention
The U.S. Supreme Court has never ruled on enforcement mechanisms for delegate restrictions.

HB 5507 assumes enforceability of delegate limits that have never been tested in federal court. 2️⃣ Delegate “Limits” May Not Be Legally Binding While HB 5507 attempts to restrict delegate authority through commissioning resolutions and recall provisions:

Article V itself does not provide a state enforcement mechanism once a convention convenes.
Constitutional scholars disagree on whether delegates could exceed their instructions.
If a delegate voted beyond their instructions, enforcement would likely require federal judicial review — an uncertain and potentially delayed process.

This creates legal ambiguity and risk. 3️⃣ One-State-One-Vote Structure Creates Disproportionate Influence Historically, interstate conventions operate under a one-state-one-vote model. That means:

West Virginia (1.7 million people) would have equal voting power to California (39 million).
Amendments could be proposed by a coalition of 26 states representing a minority of the U.S. population.

This raises structural concerns about democratic proportionality. 4️⃣ Proposal Threshold vs. Ratification Threshold While ratification requires 38 states (3/4), only 26 states could propose amendments at the convention stage. This means:

A simple majority of states could introduce sweeping constitutional changes.
Political momentum and national pressure could influence ratification outcomes.

The proposal stage itself carries significant political weight. 5️⃣ Fiscal Considerations HB 5507 establishes:

Delegate compensation
Administrative oversight
Advisory committee functions

The bill creates a new statutory framework without clarity on long-term fiscal exposure if a convention occurs. 6️⃣ No Immediate Necessity Congress already retains authority to propose constitutional amendments under Article V with a two-thirds vote. An Article V convention is not required for constitutional reform. Establishing a statutory framework for an unprecedented constitutional process increases institutional risk without demonstrated necessity. Conclusion HB 5507 normalizes participation in an unprecedented and legally unsettled constitutional process. Given:

The absence of judicial clarity,
The inability to guarantee enforceable delegate limits,
Structural concerns regarding representation,
And potential fiscal implications,

This bill should not advance without:

Clear constitutional safeguards,
Transparent fiscal impact analysis,
And broader public deliberation.

For these reasons, I respectfully urge opposition to HB 5507.

2026 Regular Session HB5260 (Health and Human Resources)

Comment by: Sarah Price on February 13, 2026 18:43

Edibles would add to the variety and ease of use for those that dont vape or smoke Marijuana.

2026 Regular Session HB5260 (Health and Human Resources)

Comment by: Courtney Pieta on February 13, 2026 18:32

I am a medical cannabis user in our great state. My family has a long history of lung diseases, heart attacks, strokes, you name it. I suffered an injury to my spine a few years ago and without medical cannabis I would not be able to perform everyday life without pain and suffering. I currently use a dry vaporizer and sometimes a vape cartridge, I’ve noticed a large difference between before my injury when I didn’t use medical cannabis that I am coughing a lot more and experiencing some chest pains from time to time. I know that’s a given, but it is the only way I can get some relief. With the legalization of edibles, this would eliminate my need to use any vapor whatsoever. That’s just me. I am 23. Imagine someone who is 74 who cannot use any vapor products. I know someone personally whose grandfather is going through a really tough time gaining weight and feeling hungry. Medical Cannabis edibles would not only help him but so many others.

2026 Regular Session HB5053 (Public Education)

Comment by: Madeline Renner on February 13, 2026 18:22

There are already multiple safeguards in place for child who are truant. This bill completely disregards the Parents Bill of Rights and could be detrimental to the child mental & physical wellbeing, especially those who are being bullied within the school systems. This is a blatant infringement on parental rights.

2026 Regular Session HB4459 (Public Health)

Comment by: Soren Shade on February 13, 2026 18:18

Prohibition doesn’t work. It fuels black markets, reduces product quality, and makes life worse for people who rely on what’s being prohibited.

West Virginia already regulates kratom, and my business spends thousands of dollars a year to comply with licensing. If there are real problems tied to kratom, address them through regulation: investigate what harms are occurring, and fix them with specific rules and enforcement—not a ban.

If this bill is simply about disapproval of something that feels unfamiliar, that’s not a serious basis for policy—especially from anyone claiming to value freedom or personal responsibility.

2026 Regular Session HB5260 (Health and Human Resources)

Comment by: Kimberly Rose on February 13, 2026 18:03

I have COPD and can't smoke so gummies would work

2026 Regular Session HB5260 (Health and Human Resources)

Comment by: Patrick smalls on February 13, 2026 18:02

I want gummy

2026 Regular Session HB5260 (Health and Human Resources)

Comment by: Susan J Carroll on February 13, 2026 18:01

I would actually love to get edibles at the medical dispensaries.

2026 Regular Session HB4712 (Judiciary)

Comment by: Rachel Belcher on February 13, 2026 17:58

Please pass this law. R.I.P Baylea Bower

2026 Regular Session SB704 (Judiciary)

Comment by: Steven Wendelin on February 13, 2026 17:34

I strongly support Senate Bill 704, the Veterans’ Empowerment and Trust Safeguard Act. Our veterans deserve honest guidance when navigating the VA system, not high-pressure sales tactics or excessive fees. For generations, accredited Veterans Service Organizations like the VFW, American Legion, and DAV have provided claims assistance free of charge because their mission is service, not profit. When companies step in and charge large sums for the same work, it opens the door to abuse and undermines the trust our veterans place in the system.

On a personal note, I received outstanding support from a VFW Veterans Service Officer during my own VA process. The professionalism, integrity, and no-cost assistance made a real difference, and it is exactly the kind of veteran-to-veteran service we should be strengthening, not replacing. This legislation helps ensure that accredited representatives remain the gold standard while protecting veterans and their families from predatory practices. It is a practical, pro-veteran measure that reinforces accountability, transparency, and respect for those who served.

2026 Regular Session HB5485 (Energy and Public Works)

Comment by: Jayli Flynn on February 13, 2026 17:19

I oppose HB 5485 because it raises West Virginia’s minimum wage to $11.00/hour effective after December 31, 2026 (Jan. 1, 2027) without any accompanying plan to prevent benefits cliffs and cost-of-living passthroughs that can leave low-income workers worse off. 1) The bill creates a benefits cliff risk (Medicaid/SNAP) with no mitigation. West Virginia’s current minimum wage is $8.75/hour under state law. Raising wages can push some workers over eligibility thresholds for programs like Medicaid (WV is an expansion state, generally up to 138% of the Federal Poverty Level for adults) and SNAP, causing coverage loss or churn—yet HB 5485 contains no transitional coverage, phased benefit reductions, or hold-harmless provisions. 2) SNAP reductions can be steep even when incomes remain low. SNAP benefit calculations assume households spend 30% of net income on food; as income rises, benefits drop accordingly. In practice, many workers experience sharp reductions in food assistance from relatively small income changes—especially when housing and utility costs are already high. HB 5485 does not address this predictable outcome. 3) Housing and prices can absorb wage gains. In tight local rental markets, landlords can raise rents when they believe tenants have more income, and labor-cost increases can also raise prices in labor-intensive sectors. HB 5485 contains no parallel housing affordability measures, anti-price-gouging enforcement triggers, or targeted relief to ensure the wage increase translates into real purchasing power. 4) The bill text itself includes a discrepancy that should be corrected before passage. The bill’s note states it increases the wage from $8.25/hour to $11.00/hour, but current WV law sets $8.75/hour. This should be corrected for accuracy and fiscal clarity. If the Legislature wants to raise wages responsibly, it should pair any wage increase with:

“Cliff smoothing” (gradual phase-outs) and/or transitional Medicaid coverage
Strengthened state EITC or targeted tax credits for low-income workers
Housing affordability actions to prevent rent from absorbing wage gains

Until HB 5485 includes a real plan to prevent loss of Medicaid/SNAP and rent/price passthroughs, I urge a NO vote.

2026 Regular Session HB5260 (Health and Human Resources)

Comment by: Zach Barnette on February 13, 2026 17:08

I think we should be able to purchase edibles at our dispensaries for our medial use

2026 Regular Session HB5260 (Health and Human Resources)

Comment by: Blaine Dean on February 13, 2026 17:07

I support this bill because for some patients can not inhale it safely. but as for me it would treat some of my illnesses like Crohn’s disease and IBD in a more direct manner then inhaling it

2026 Regular Session HB5260 (Health and Human Resources)

Comment by: Lexys Perdue on February 13, 2026 17:06

I have severe asthma and pulmonary sarcoidosis, edibles would be a complete game changer for me taking my medicine. Please consider patients like me as well as the elderly who would much rather get our medicine in this form.

2026 Regular Session HB4712 (Judiciary)

Comment by: Emily Howerton on February 13, 2026 17:02

This bill will save so many lives and will make people more accountable.

2026 Regular Session HB5479 (Judiciary)

Comment by: Jody Mohr on February 13, 2026 17:00

I urge you to support this bill. It is a common sense approach that will increase public safety by identifying legitimate law enforcement to the public.

2026 Regular Session HB5260 (Health and Human Resources)

Comment by: Corina Surface on February 13, 2026 16:55

I know many individuals who benefit from edibles. Individuals with lung problems who have trouble smoking, hand problems in individuals make it difficult to break up or grind flower well for vaping purposes. Many elderly or breathing difficulty clients would benefit from edibles options. Also those with transplants of any sort or compromised immune systems can struggle to smoke or are told not to and edibles would benefit them greatly.

2026 Regular Session HB5260 (Health and Human Resources)

Comment by: Christina Duncan on February 13, 2026 16:54

Should have anything marijuana related in the dispensary.

2026 Regular Session HB4712 (Judiciary)

Comment by: Christina Suttle on February 13, 2026 16:52

to whom it may concern I believe that this bill should carry a higher sentence no parent or family should have to burry their kid due to a drunk driver. There is so many people out here with dui’s on their records or that’s out drinking and driving and not being stopped or held accountable for their actions they go in and they are out same day or next day. Or they don’t serve anytime. It’s time for us as a state to stop the drunk drivers before someone else is killed.

2026 Regular Session HB5260 (Health and Human Resources)

Comment by: Samantha L Lowe on February 13, 2026 16:52

Edibles wanted I think they are better don’t have to worry about the smoke bothering anyone if you have edibles also helps you sleep good at night without the smell of smoke on you

2026 Regular Session HB5260 (Health and Human Resources)

Comment by: Stevie Looney on February 13, 2026 16:44

I absolutely support edibles in WV dispensaries. Please bring them into shops as soon as possible. Would be good to another option.

2026 Regular Session HB4712 (Judiciary)

Comment by: Miriam Adkins on February 13, 2026 16:34

Justice for Baylea Bower, Destiny Lester deserves jail time! There’s proof where she has no care in the world and flaunted how she’d get drunk WHILE BEING UNDERAGE and the judge think that’s cute, all he cares about is the money.

2026 Regular Session HB5260 (Health and Human Resources)

Comment by: Luís Soto on February 13, 2026 16:26

Consuming medical cannabis in edible form offers significant, sustained therapeutic benefits for both physical and mental health by providing a smoke-free, long-lasting, and accurately dosed alternative to inhalation. Clinical studies have shown that edibles, which are metabolized into potent cannabinoids (such as 11-hydroxy-THC), are highly effective for managing chronic pain, with one 2024 study revealing a 64% relative decrease in pain among users, alongside improvements in sleep. For mental health, the slower release of edibles allows for a more stable, calming effect, with research indicating that controlled, low-dose THC and balanced CBD-to-THC edibles can reduce anxiety, alleviate PTSD-related nightmares, and improve overall mental well-being without causing the intense psychoactive effects associated with smoking. Furthermore, studies have demonstrated that medical cannabis can significantly improve quality of life, with patients reporting reduced anxiety, better emotional functioning, and decreased reliance on other medications. Notably, edibles are particularly suited for managing chronic pain, nausea, and spasticity without causing the pulmonary damage associated with smoking. Key Takeaways on Edible Benefits & Studies: Long-Lasting Relief: Edibles generally provide a slower onset but more sustained, 6–8 hour effect, making them ideal for chronic pain management. Mental Health Improvements: Low-dose THC/CBD edibles are used to manage anxiety, with studies confirming their efficacy in treating PTSD-related symptoms, such as nightmares and anxiety. Reduced Nausea: Oral cannabinoids are proven effective antiemetics for chemotherapy-induced nausea. Safe Alternative to Smoking: Edibles offer a way to consume cannabis that avoids harmful toxins that can hurt lung health. Finally, and most importantly, it is one of the oldest forms of medicinal treatment with the usage of botanical agriculture, and we still don't know the fullest extent of what properties the plant can help us achieve.

2026 Regular Session HB4712 (Judiciary)

Comment by: Michele Cook on February 13, 2026 16:20

Please pass House Bill 4712

2026 Regular Session HB4511 (Health and Human Resources)

Comment by: Donna Cornell on February 13, 2026 16:19

It is imperative that prospective foster parents undergo mandatory drug screening to ensure the safety and well-being of children placed in their care, thereby mitigating the risk of exposure to substance abuse or other detrimental circumstances.

2026 Regular Session HB4712 (Judiciary)

Comment by: Donna Farruggia on February 13, 2026 16:11

Please pass this bill and protect others that’s in the situation…

2026 Regular Session HB5260 (Health and Human Resources)

Comment by: Megon Allen on February 13, 2026 15:55

Yes please

2026 Regular Session HB5471 (Judiciary)

Comment by: Jayli Flynn on February 13, 2026 15:41

I respectfully oppose HB 5471 in its current form. HB 5471 proposes increasing salaries for magistrates, circuit court judges, family court judges, intermediate court judges, and Supreme Court justices beginning July 1, 2026. According to the bill text, this includes raising magistrate salaries to $75,880 and Supreme Court justices to $154,600, with corresponding increases for other judicial positions. While judicial independence and competitive compensation are important, this proposal must be evaluated in the context of West Virginia’s broader fiscal realities. West Virginia consistently ranks near the bottom nationally in median household income (approximately mid-$50,000 range according to recent U.S. Census data). Many state employees, teachers, first responders, and public health workers earn significantly less than the salaries proposed in this bill. Additionally, the state continues to debate reductions in revenue streams, including income tax cuts, while facing ongoing obligations related to infrastructure, public health, education, and pension liabilities. Increasing judicial salaries creates a permanent recurring budget obligation. Salary increases also raise long-term pension liabilities because judicial retirement benefits are tied to compensation levels. This has actuarial and fiscal impacts beyond the immediate pay increase. Before approving salary increases at this level, the Legislature should:

Provide a published fiscal note detailing the total long-term cost, including pension impacts.
Demonstrate that the Judges’ Retirement System is fully funded or on a stable actuarial path.
Compare proposed judicial salary levels to surrounding states using objective cost-of-living and caseload metrics.
Address workforce shortages in lower-paid public sectors before increasing upper-tier compensation.

West Virginia taxpayers deserve transparency regarding long-term financial commitments. In a state with persistent economic challenges, salary increases at the highest levels of government must be justified with clear data showing recruitment problems, retention crises, or constitutional necessity. Absent that evidence, HB 5471 prioritizes high-level salary growth over broader fiscal stability and workforce equity. For these reasons, I urge careful reconsideration or amendment of this bill

2026 Regular Session HB4175 (Government Organization)

Comment by: J. McMurray on February 13, 2026 15:39

Do not repeal the law requiring state inspections. Some cite expense and inconvience for an inspection every 2 years. What about a compromise, an inspection every 3 years? I've seen those clunkers from adjoining states. Loud exhausts, fenders flapping, missing bumpers, squealing brakes well past the warning indicator, burned out lights. A disaster involving them is a matter of when, not if. Approximately 37 U.S. states have some form of mandatory vehicle inspection, covering safety, emissions, or VIN verification. While it is true 14 states still require periodic (annual or biennial) safety inspections for vehicles.

2026 Regular Session HB5469 (Finance)

Comment by: Jayli Flynn on February 13, 2026 15:38

I respectfully oppose House Bill 5469. House Bill 5469 would amend West Virginia Code § 11A-1-17 to authorize sheriffs to receive a $15,000 annual commission in addition to their regular salary and compensation once they have collected 85 % of all real and personal property taxes assessed in their county. This effectively creates a performance-based bonus tied to tax collection rates, paid from the same tax funds sheriffs are responsible for collecting. 1. Creates Additional Compensation Without Clear Funding Source Although the bill specifies that the $15,000 commission is charged against the funds from which taxes are collected, there is no:

Dedicated revenue source or cap limiting how often commissions are paid
Protection to ensure that the commission does not reduce net funds available for county services
Impact analysis showing how this payment would affect county budgets

As a result:

Counties could face increased payroll costs.
Local tax revenues intended for education, public safety, infrastructure, and other county functions could be diverted to fund these commissions.

This shift imposes a financial obligation with ambiguous fiscal impacts on county taxpayers. 2. Ties Sheriff Compensation to Tax Collection Without Guarantee of Public Benefit HB 5469 conditions a $15,000 commission on the sheriff’s office collecting at least 85 % of property taxes assessed, but:

Tax collection performance is influenced by economic factors beyond a sheriff’s direct control (e.g., tax delinquency trends, property values, taxpayer hardship, state economic conditions).
The bill does not require:
- Reporting on how this incentive impacts collections over time,
- Accountability for how any additional revenue is used,
- Safeguards to ensure the incentive does not disincentivize equitable enforcement of tax liabilities.

This creates a compensation structure that could reward outcomes not fully aligned with broader county and community priorities. 3. Lacks Transparency and Long-Term Fiscal Analysis As introduced, HB 5469 does not include:

A fiscal note estimating the total annual and multi-year cost of these commissions statewide,
A breakdown of how many counties currently achieve 85 % property tax collections,
An assessment of how often the commission would be paid under current law and economic trends.

Without that information, policymakers and the public cannot accurately assess the budgetary impact of this bill. 4. Sets Precedent for Performance Bonuses Without Universal Standards Paying a fixed commission tied to one metric (tax collection rate) but not others (e.g., public safety outcomes, community satisfaction, delinquency reduction strategies) risks:

Creating uneven compensation systems between counties of varying economic conditions,
Encouraging a narrow focus on one financial indicator rather than a comprehensive view of county governance.

Conclusion House Bill 5469, as introduced:

Creates additional compensation for sheriffs tied to tax collection,
Potentially diverts local tax revenue away from essential services,
Lacks fiscal transparency and long-term cost assessment,
Does not include accountability provisions linking the bonus to measurable public benefit outcomes.

For these reasons, I respectfully oppose HB 5469.

2026 Regular Session HB5468 (Finance)

Comment by: Jayli Flynn on February 13, 2026 15:36

I respectfully oppose House Bill 5468. HB 5468 would require the State of West Virginia to allocate an additional $5,000 per deputy sheriff position to each county, to be paid from the state’s general revenue fund, and used exclusively for deputy sheriff pay raises. 1. Creates a Recurring State Obligation from General Revenue The bill mandates a recurring expenditure from the general revenue fund. General revenue supports statewide obligations including public education, Medicaid, higher education, infrastructure, corrections, and pension liabilities. HB 5468 does not identify:

A new revenue source
A budget offset
A funding cap
A sunset provision

This means the cost would continue annually and grow if the number of deputy positions increases. 2. No Fiscal Impact Transparency in the Bill Text As introduced, HB 5468 does not contain:

A total projected annual cost
A long-term fiscal impact estimate
A funding sustainability analysis

Without those figures, lawmakers and taxpayers cannot fully evaluate the long-term budgetary impact. 3. No Accountability or Performance Requirements The bill requires that funds be used “exclusively” for pay raises but does not require:

Reporting on how the funds are used
Demonstration of recruitment or retention improvements
Measurable public safety outcomes
Oversight or auditing requirements specific to the new allocation

There is no structural mechanism tying the additional spending to measurable results. 4. Sets Precedent for Sector-Specific General Revenue Supplements HB 5468 directs statewide tax revenue to a specific employee group without broader compensation reform. If compensation disparities exist across public service sectors (teachers, EMS, corrections, public health workers), those should be addressed through comprehensive workforce policy rather than targeted general revenue supplements. 5. Intergenerational Fiscal Responsibility Because this funding comes from general revenue and creates a continuing obligation, the cost ultimately falls on current and future taxpayers. Recurring obligations should include transparent fiscal modeling and sustainability planning before enactment. Conclusion HB 5468:

Creates a permanent general revenue expenditure
Lacks a dedicated funding source
Provides no fiscal impact estimate in the bill text
Includes no accountability or performance safeguards

For these reasons, I respectfully oppose HB 5468 unless amended to include full fiscal transparency, sustainability analysis, and accountability provisions.

2026 Regular Session HB4712 (Judiciary)

Comment by: Tori Bell on February 13, 2026 15:36

No one should be able to make the decision to get behind a wheel impaired and not have to answer for their consequences. Especially when it causes the death of another person. justice should be served.

2026 Regular Session HB5467 (Finance)

Comment by: Jayli Flynn on February 13, 2026 15:33

I respectfully oppose HB 5467, which increases the retirement multiplier for deputy sheriffs under West Virginia’s Deputy Sheriff Retirement System from 2.5% to 3% of final average salary per year of service. 1️⃣ Long-Term Fiscal Impact on Taxpayers An increase from 2.5% to 3% is not minor — it represents a 20% increase in pension accrual per year of service. Example:

25 years of service
- Current formula (2.5%): 62.5% of final average salary
- Proposed formula (3%): 75% of final average salary

That is a significant lifetime increase in defined-benefit obligations. Because this is a defined benefit pension system, taxpayers ultimately bear the actuarial risk if:

Investment returns underperform
Contribution rates fall short
Liabilities are underestimated

This cost does not disappear. It shifts forward — onto Millennials, Gen Z, and Gen Alpha, who will be funding these obligations long after current policymakers leave office. 2️⃣ Retroactive Application Concerns The bill applies to members retiring on or after July 1, 2018. Retroactive benefit increases:

Expand unfunded actuarial liabilities
Create precedent for future retroactive enhancements
Increase pension system volatility

Any increase in multiplier should be accompanied by a transparent actuarial note outlining:

Projected 10-, 20-, and 30-year cost impacts
Required employer contribution increases
Impact on county budgets

Without that analysis, this bill shifts financial risk without full public disclosure. 3️⃣ Re-Entry / “Double-Dipping” Structural Risk West Virginia has previously allowed various forms of post-retirement reemployment in public service roles. When retirement systems permit individuals to:

Retire under enhanced benefits
Then return to work in covered or related positions

This can create structural inequities and higher long-term costs. If the multiplier is increased, safeguards should be strengthened to prevent:

Simultaneous pension draw and re-employment in the same system without actuarial neutrality
Manipulation of final average salary calculations
Pension spiking through late-career compensation adjustments

Absent reform in these areas, increasing the multiplier amplifies existing structural risks. 4️⃣ Equity and Preferential Treatment Concerns Other public employees in West Virginia do not receive comparable retirement multipliers at this level. If deputy sheriffs receive a 3% accrual rate:

Is similar enhancement being offered to teachers?
EMS personnel?
Public health workers?
Corrections staff?
Municipal employees?

Preferential benefit expansion for one sector — without comprehensive pension reform — raises fairness concerns across the workforce. 5️⃣ Intergenerational Responsibility West Virginia already faces:

Population decline
Aging demographics
Workforce participation challenges

Increasing long-term fixed pension liabilities without structural reform increases the burden on a shrinking tax base. Intergenerational fiscal responsibility requires:

Fully funded enhancements
Transparent actuarial certification
Structural safeguards against future unfunded liabilities

Without those protections, HB 5467 risks compounding long-term pension strain. Conclusion While law enforcement service is important, retirement enhancements must be evaluated in the context of:

Long-term solvency
Intergenerational equity
Structural pension reform
Re-employment safeguards

HB 5467 increases permanent pension obligations without accompanying systemic reform or clearly disclosed long-term fiscal modeling. For these reasons, I respectfully oppose this bill unless amended to include:

A full actuarial impact statement
Anti-double-dipping safeguards
Long-term funding guarantees
Equity review across all public retirement systems

Tax policy should not create permanent obligations that future generations must absorb without their consent

2026 Regular Session HB4712 (Judiciary)

Comment by: Amber Wilkinson on February 13, 2026 15:32

Many people I know have lost loved ones at the extent of an intoxicated driver. Justice deserves to be served!

2026 Regular Session HB5097 (Health and Human Resources)

Comment by: Troy Osborne on February 13, 2026 15:30

I am supporting this bill because it would help us all get the best healthcare in most positive ways. That is why we need to get this bill passed and prevent this from becoming a misunderstanding in communication between patients and providers.

2026 Regular Session HB5465 (Judiciary)

Comment by: Jayli Flynn on February 13, 2026 15:30

I respectfully oppose House Bill 5465. HB 5465 would amend West Virginia Code §30-2-1 to permit any individual holding a master’s degree — regardless of the field of study — to sit for the West Virginia Bar Examination. This proposal raises significant concerns regarding both professional standards and equitable access within our state. 1. West Virginia Has Low Graduate Degree Attainment According to U.S. Census Bureau data compiled by the Federal Reserve Economic Data (FRED), approximately 9.6% of West Virginians age 25 and older hold a graduate or professional degree. That means fewer than 1 in 10 adults in the state possess the credential this bill would require. West Virginia also ranks among the lowest states nationally in overall higher education attainment. Approximately 19–20% of adults hold a bachelor’s degree or higher, well below the national average. Conditioning bar exam eligibility on possession of a master’s degree does not expand access for most West Virginians. Instead, it ties eligibility to a credential held by a small minority of the population — many of whom already have substantial financial and geographic access to higher education. In rural counties especially, access to graduate programs is limited, and pursuing a master’s degree often requires relocation and significant debt. If the goal is to address attorney shortages or expand opportunity, this bill does not meaningfully address structural barriers to legal education in West Virginia. 2. Master’s Degrees Do Not Ensure Legal Training Under current West Virginia Rules for Admission to the Practice of Law, applicants must graduate from an approved law school (J.D. or equivalent) before sitting for the bar exam. Law school provides structured instruction in:

Constitutional law
Civil procedure
Criminal law
Contracts and torts
Evidence
Legal research and writing
Professional responsibility and ethics

A general master’s degree — whether in business, biology, education, engineering, or another field — does not provide this legal training. The bar examination is designed to test legal knowledge; it is not designed to substitute for formal legal education. Eliminating the legal education prerequisite without replacing it with a defined law-specific training pathway removes a long-standing safeguard intended to ensure baseline professional competency before licensure. 3. Public Protection Considerations Attorney licensure standards exist to protect the public. Lawyers handle matters involving constitutional rights, criminal defense, property, contracts, family law, and access to the courts. Lowering educational prerequisites without implementing structured legal training requirements risks weakening that protective framework. Other jurisdictions that explore alternative pathways to licensure typically require supervised apprenticeships or defined legal coursework — not simply possession of an unrelated graduate degree. Conclusion HB 5465 does not meaningfully expand access for most West Virginians, given that fewer than 10% of adults hold a graduate degree. At the same time, it removes a core legal education requirement that has traditionally served to protect the public and maintain professional standards. For these reasons, I respectfully urge rejection of HB 5465 in its current form.

2026 Regular Session HB5462 (Finance)

Comment by: Jayli Flynn on February 13, 2026 15:25

I respectfully oppose House Bill 5462 as introduced. HB 5462 amends §33-30-6 of the West Virginia Code relating to mine subsidence insurance and clarifies limitations on coverage limits under the state’s Mine Subsidence Insurance Program. While framed as a technical clarification, any change affecting coverage limits, deductibles, or program structure must be evaluated in light of West Virginia’s long history of underground mining and the ongoing risk to homeowners. Mine subsidence is not a hypothetical concern in this state. Large portions of West Virginia sit over abandoned underground coal mines. When subsidence occurs, homeowners often have no viable responsible operator to pursue for damages. The Mine Subsidence Insurance Program therefore functions as a critical backstop for residents whose homes are damaged through no fault of their own. My concerns are as follows:

Coverage Adequacy: Any clarification or limitation on coverage must ensure that policy limits remain sufficient to cover modern reconstruction costs. Construction and material costs have risen significantly in recent years. If coverage caps or structural limitations fail to keep pace with actual rebuilding costs, homeowners will bear uncompensated losses.
Risk Allocation: The Mine Subsidence Insurance Program exists because historical mining created long-term structural risk. Legislative changes should not shift more of that financial burden onto individual property owners or taxpayers through narrowed coverage or higher effective exposure.
Transparency and Actuarial Justification: Before altering statutory language regarding coverage limits, the Legislature should publicly disclose actuarial data demonstrating:
- Current claim frequency and severity,
- Solvency projections of the fund,
- Whether existing limits are inadequate or excessive,
- The fiscal necessity of the proposed clarification.
Public Protection Purpose: Chapter 33-30 was enacted to provide equitable availability of mine subsidence coverage statewide. Any amendment must preserve that protective purpose and avoid unintentionally weakening consumer safeguards.

West Virginia communities continue to live with the legacy impacts of underground mining. Insurance mechanisms addressing that legacy should err on the side of homeowner protection, not financial contraction. For these reasons, I urge careful reconsideration of HB 5462 and request full fiscal and actuarial transparency before any statutory limitation on mine subsidence coverage is modified.

2026 Regular Session HB5260 (Health and Human Resources)

Comment by: Carlos Duncan on February 13, 2026 15:19

Would love to see the dispensary have edibles

2026 Regular Session HB5154 (Judiciary)

Comment by: John Wells on February 13, 2026 15:18

This bill by Kayla Young is very much needed, considering that very little or NOTHING happens within the WVHRC in the time frame of one year. It takes them forever even to assign a case worker or investigator, not to mention the time it takes for people to find and retain legal assistance or counsel. The bill needs to be fully supported by both the Senate and House in unison. It's high time that this problem with the system be addressed by the Legislature. I also think that these so called secret or confidential WVHRC investigations should be made transparent for all parties. Secrecy WASTES so very much of the complainants time that it's ridiculous. I also thing the HRC should have the power to negotiate settlements or offer arbitration at the States expense, since WV is one of the poorest states in the union. It would save money and lessen the burden on civil courts immensely, and make the 6th Constitutional Amendment a reality[the right to face your accuser] instead of a royal joke.

2026 Regular Session HB5460 (Finance)

Comment by: Jayli Flynn on February 13, 2026 15:17

I am submitting this comment in opposition to House Bill 5460, the Construction Cost Relief Act, based on substantive concerns regarding equity, fiscal prioritization, and lack of enforceable public benefit. House Bill 5460 proposes a refund of sales tax on construction materials used to build new single-family homes, payable after construction and sale (WV Code § Article ___). The bill authorizes the Tax Commissioner to calculate rebate limits based on county and state housing price indexes, and allows builders to claim up to 30% of the sale price as the maximum eligible rebate. The refund must be filed within one year of construction completion and applies to homes where construction begins after July 1, 2026. While increasing housing supply is a legitimate policy goal, the current structure of HB 5460 raises the following grave concerns: 1. Disproportionate Benefit to Private Property Owners HB 5460 provides a tax expenditure that accrues exclusively to private builders and future homebuyers of single-family homes. It does not include any affordability criteria, income targeting, or workforce housing requirements. As a result, public funds would be transferred to private property development without ensuring measurable public benefit or broad distribution of value. Tax expenditures function identically to direct spending. A refund of sales tax revenue reduces the state’s revenue stream and reallocates public resources, yet the bill imposes no statutory obligation that the construction benefit affordable housing outcomes or serve households unable to access homeownership. This creates an unequal subsidy that favors capital holders over the broader tax base. 2. Lack of Targeted Support for Renters and Cost-Burdened Households Many West Virginia households are renters living paycheck-to-paycheck, face utility and food cost burdens, and lack liquid assets necessary for down payments or qualifying mortgages. HB 5460 does nothing to address these structural barriers. In contrast, state policies that tie incentives to affordability restrictions, income thresholds, or long-term rent stabilization have demonstrated more equitable outcomes in other jurisdictions. The absence of such conditions in HB 5460 means that the public does not receive accountability for public revenue expenditures. 3. Opportunity Cost of State Revenue The sales tax refunds authorized under HB 5460 will reduce revenue that could otherwise support:

Expanded rental assistance programs
State housing trust fund contributions
Water and sewer utility affordability measures
Workforce development
Public safety net services

Without a requirement that the refunded revenue translate into tangible public housing benefits, the public bears the fiscal risk while private actors benefit. 4. No Conditional Public Benefit Requirements Unlike other state housing incentive programs that include clawback provisions, affordability periods, or monitoring requirements, HB 5460 contains no mechanism to ensure long-term public gains from the tax expenditure. Without statutory conditions, builders and buyers may receive refunds regardless of whether the resulting housing is affordable or accessible to low- and moderate-income families. Conclusion For these reasons, I oppose HB 5460 in its current form. If the Legislature intends to use tax policy to support housing development, it should pair those incentives with clear affordability requirements, income targeting, and accountability measures that ensure public benefits commensurate with public cost. I urge the Committee on Finance and the full House of Delegates to reject HB 5460 or to require amendments that incorporate enforceable public benefit conditions tied to affordability and equitable access to housing.

2026 Regular Session HB5260 (Health and Human Resources)

Comment by: Natasha Redman on February 13, 2026 15:05

Gummies would be so beneficial to our area

2026 Regular Session HB4106 (Judiciary)

Comment by: donna on February 13, 2026 15:01

I disagree that individuals aged 18 to 20 should be permitted to carry weapons without a permit. A significant portion of individuals in this age group, particularly those who have just turned 18, may lack the necessary maturity to responsibly own a weapon. Their perception of adulthood might lead them to believe they are invincible and can act without considering the repercussion. Without the proper training and proof of responsibility, they should not be allowed.

2026 Regular Session HB5260 (Health and Human Resources)

Comment by: Christopher Lewis on February 13, 2026 14:46

Dear Members of the House Health and Human Resources Committee,

I am writing to express my strong support for HB 5260, which authorizes the production of edible medical cannabis products in West Virginia.

This legislation is a necessary step forward for patient care. Allowing certified processors to manufacture edible products provides a safe, regulated alternative for patients who cannot or prefer not to use inhalable methods. It aligns our state with best practices in patient care, ensuring that medical cannabis is accessible in familiar and effective forms.

Furthermore, by placing this production under the oversight of permitted, regulated processors, HB 5260 ensures product safety, consistency, and accountability. This improves upon the current program by enhancing safety for certified patients.

I urge you to support HB 5260 and help move this crucial legislation forward.

Sincerely,

Christopher Lewis

2026 Regular Session HB5260 (Health and Human Resources)

Comment by: Steven Payne on February 13, 2026 14:39

Legalize all Marijuana related items, including edibles!

2026 Regular Session HB4712 (Judiciary)

Comment by: Kaleigh Washington on February 13, 2026 14:24

Drunk driving is not an accident. It’s a knowingly dangerous choice.

2026 Regular Session HB5345 (Health and Human Resources)

Comment by: Stephanie Hyre on February 13, 2026 14:21

I am writing in support of HB 5345, bipartisan legislation requiring enrollment-based childcare subsidy payments. Childcare providers operate with fixed costs that do not change hour by hour. Staffing ratios must be maintained, employees must be paid, and facilities must remain open and operational whether a child attends two hours or a full day. The current attendance-based reimbursement structure relies on an outdated hourly conversion model that does not reflect the true cost of delivering care. Enrollment-based payments provide stability and predictability, allowing providers to budget responsibly, retain qualified staff, and continue serving working families. Codifying this structure in state law also protects providers and families in the event federal policy changes in the future. A sustainable childcare system is essential to supporting West Virginia’s workforce and economic growth. HB 5345 is a practical and necessary step toward strengthening childcare access and provider stability across our state.

2026 Regular Session HB5087 (Government Administration)

Comment by: Catherine Donahoe on February 13, 2026 14:17

This is more of a burden than its worth. Just apply for reciprocal license and maintain both. All the states have to do is agree upon what other states they will work with for reciprocity. This is much easier than trying to establish a new Commission for Licensure. We need things to be simple not complex and confusing. This HB is 29 pages of nonsense and more oversight. KEEP IT SIMPLE thank you Catherine Donahoe owner / Director of the Huntington School of Beauty Culture licensed cosmetologist for 37 years and a school owner for 20 years

2026 Regular Session HB5260 (Health and Human Resources)

Comment by: Trinity Tenney on February 13, 2026 14:05

I have benefited from the use of medical cannabis greatly but the only thing I do not benefit from is the way of consumption. I would like there to be a way to take medical cannabis without having to inhale it and harm my lungs. The people of West Virginia would greatly benefit from edible cannabis, especially elderly patients that would be able to easily consume. This is my opinion and I have all hopes the board will consider it.

2026 Regular Session HB5260 (Health and Human Resources)

Comment by: Chelsa Hagedorn on February 13, 2026 14:03

I would like to be able to consume my prescription by digesting through edibles instead of vapors.

2026 Regular Session HB4712 (Judiciary)

Comment by: Cristy Anderson on February 13, 2026 13:53

Waiting until someone dies to push for harsh consequences is too late for the loved ones left behind and the individual killed. When a parent drives drunk with their own children, WV family courts will give full custody to the drunk driving parent. This will happen even if CPS substantiates abuse. The non-drunk driving, safe parent will be accused of “parental alienation” or “not encouraging a positive relationship” for asking for a stiff consequence for the parent who could have killed the children. The safe parent loses custody to the parent who made a deliberate choice to drink and drive with children. Until our consequences are stiff at all levels, for all offenders, regardless of familial status, WV is teaching our next generation that driving drunk is acceptable.

2026 Regular Session HB5260 (Health and Human Resources)

Comment by: Kendra Marie Payton on February 13, 2026 13:51

We are behibd the ball on things that we can offer our medical cannabis patients. Legalize edibles

2026 Regular Session HB4712 (Judiciary)

Comment by: Stephanie Ransom on February 13, 2026 13:50

I fully support HB 4712!

2026 Regular Session HB5260 (Health and Human Resources)

Comment by: Ginger smith on February 13, 2026 13:39

I would like to ask that edibles be introduced to the dispensaries in WV. I would like to get the effects of this medication other than smoking because I am very discrete about my meds for aniexty and taking a edibles would make me feel more comfortable about my condition and the methods I use

2026 Regular Session HB5260 (Health and Human Resources)

Comment by: Larry Robinette on February 13, 2026 13:24

Please pass this it would benefit so many people

2026 Regular Session HB4067 (Health and Human Resources)

Comment by: Carol F Evans on February 13, 2026 13:19

What a marvelous idea to support childcare workers! These workers are frequently minimum wage so this benefit would be an asset.

2026 Regular Session HB5260 (Health and Human Resources)

Comment by: Zackery Weese on February 13, 2026 13:17

Pls. We need edibles

2026 Regular Session HB4712 (Judiciary)

Comment by: Robin Pritchett on February 13, 2026 13:04

The injustice that was carried out in the case of Baylea’s murder. Is just horrendous. essentially an 18 year old, legal adult, who made bad decisions. To drink alcohol,underage in this state, use cocaine , ultimately serves no time. Rehab and home confinement. Where is the justice in this? Baylea, lost her life. Her family lost a sister, daughter, granddaughter, niece, aunt. Her husband lost his wife and the potential for having a family with her. Ultimately I feel like the owner of the vehicle, the driver and the person who contributed to the defendants condition and allowing her to drive should also be held accountable. Legally and financially. The issues of citizens of this state meeting their demise by tractor trailers, intoxicated drivers has been happening more frequently. Stiffer penalties and judges who apply those penalties are a requirement.

2026 Regular Session HB5260 (Health and Human Resources)

Comment by: Anni Corley on February 13, 2026 13:02

It’s a lot of people that could benefit from the edibles not everyone can can handle smoking it. legalize edibles please

2026 Regular Session HB4067 (Health and Human Resources)

Comment by: Tayler Dahler on February 13, 2026 12:54

I am writing in support of HB 4067, the Workforce Scholarship Act. Expanding access to workforce aligned education is one of the most practical and impactful investments we can make in our communities and our economy.

Many individuals want to pursue careers in certain fields but face financial barriers that prevent them from enrolling in training or completing certification programs. Workforce scholarships help bridge that gap, opening doors for students, working parents, and career changers.

By supporting HB 4067 it would help strengthen our ability to fill essential roles, and it promotes long term economic stability. It also reduces student debt burdens by focusing funding on credentials and programs that lead directly to employment opportunities and sustainable wages to encourage individuals to stay located within our great state.

HB 4067 is not just an education policy, it is an economic development strategy. Investing in people strengthens families, supports employers, and continues to have positive impact on communities

I respectfully urge lawmakers to pass HB 4067 and prioritize opportunities that empower individuals to succeed in our state.

Thank you for your consideration,

Tayler Dahler

2026 Regular Session HB5260 (Health and Human Resources)

Comment by: Nick Johnson on February 13, 2026 12:50

I support this bill and appreciate the effort to expand West Virginia’s medical cannabis program to include edible products. Patients need more options, especially non-smokable formats that are easier to dose and often better suited for pain, sleep, nausea, and other qualifying conditions. I am writing to respectfully request an amendment that ensures West Virginia hemp-derived cannabinoid manufacturers and operators are eligible to participate in the medical edibles program. West Virginia already has compliant hemp businesses that have operated responsibly in-state for years — investing in facilities, employees, testing, labeling, and regulatory compliance. These businesses have real-world experience producing edible products safely and consistently. If the medical program expands to include edibles but limits licensing only to current medical cannabis dispensary/grower structures, the state risks: • shutting out experienced WV manufacturers who are already doing this work, • forcing patients into a less competitive market, • and sending economic opportunity to larger out-of-state operators. A straightforward solution is to add language that allows licensed/registered WV hemp operators in good standing to apply for a medical edibles license or endorsement, with clear requirements such as: • third-party lab testing (COAs) for potency and contaminants, • compliant packaging and labeling, • batch tracking and recall procedures, • WV-based manufacturing standards, • and enforcement for noncompliance. This amendment would protect patients and strengthen the program by adding more qualified in-state producers, increasing competition, improving access, and keeping jobs and tax revenue in West Virginia. Please amend the bill so West Virginia hemp operators have a pathway into the medical edible program. We want to be part of the solution: safe products, transparent testing, and WV-grown/WV-made economic growth. Thank you for your time and for moving this legislation forward.

2026 Regular Session HB5260 (Health and Human Resources)

Comment by: Jeremy pope on February 13, 2026 12:47

I want edibles in wv tired of traveling

2026 Regular Session HB4517 (Health and Human Resources)

Comment by: Carol F Evans on February 13, 2026 12:47

Allowing businesses to get tax credits so they can assist employees with childcare is a great advantage. We need readily available childcare in order to support and build the workforce.

2026 Regular Session HB5433 (Finance)

Comment by: Carrie Shipman on February 13, 2026 12:46

This bill needs to pass! It is very difficult to work when you cannot hear. Hearing is a part of your whole health. Your quality of life declines when you are unable to hear.

2026 Regular Session HB5345 (Health and Human Resources)

Comment by: Carol F Evans on February 13, 2026 12:44

In order to support a strong workforce, there must be sufficient access to childcare. This bill would support keeping access to childcare. Workers moving from other States would want assurance that childcare is available. Please move this bill forward. Thanks

2026 Regular Session HB4712 (Judiciary)

Comment by: Naeomey Stinnette on February 13, 2026 12:37

I feel as though the time sentenced and fines NEED to be doubled for DUI . In the case of Baylea Bower she got 0 justice , while Destany walked away with a slap on the wrist after taking a precious life . I never knew Baylea personally but she was clearly the light of everyone’s life . On the other hand I knew Destany personally , we were once very close and she didn’t start out this way . Her mother was her biggest enabler and continued to allow her to do these things . I started to notice how much this girl was drinking and I reached out multiple times asking “Hey is everything okay” , “Why are you drinking everyday” , “You’re clearly trying to escape something to be drinking that much” , and everytime I got the same response from those close to her “Oh she’s fine” or “Well that’s her choice” . It was very much so brushed off every single time and that was simply enough for me to choose not to be around her . At the time I genuinely couldn’t figure out how she was drinking EVERY SINGLE DAY , still showing up the work , drinking immediately after getting off work and continuing with this same routine DAILY , as everyone knows now she was using cocaine very often to keep up with this routine . At the time of her ending Baylea’s life I know she was coked out driving back to Mullens after have being awake for a few days ultimately resulting in her falling asleep behind the wheel , crossing the median and killing Baylea head on . Maybe I would’ve had more compassion for Destany in the beginning of this process had she actually had remorse for ENDING A LIFE , yet she could care less that she took Baylea from her family . Destany was more upset about losing all her piercings for her MRI than she was about taking an innocent life , that spoke volumes to me and told me exactly who she was as a person . I truly don’t understand how she walked away with a slap on the wrist considering that when police and EMT arrived she told them a boy “T” (she was great friends with him) was the person driving her truck at the time of the accident , she tried to let someone else take the fall for her actions and yet she still ended up free . This is only showing Destany that she can continue her behavior and will have 0 consequences at the end of the day .

2026 Regular Session HB5493 (Health and Human Resources)

Comment by: Philip Kaso, Executive Director, WVRSOL on February 13, 2026 12:28

WVRSOL opposes HB 5493 as written because it raises U.S. Constitutional issues under the Eighth Amendment, as well as substantive and procedural due process, and double jeopardy concerns regarding additional punishment. HB-5493 authorizes courts to impose medroxyprogesterone acetate (chemical castration), permits surgical castration upon request, and creates a new felony punishable by one to five years for refusing treatment. It also allows treatment orders "up to life." The structure of this bill presents serious constitutional concerns. First, forced or prolonged hormonal suppression implicates Eighth Amendment proportionality principles recognized in Weems v. United States and Trop v. Dulles. Second, the U.S. Supreme Court has recognized a fundamental liberty interest in avoiding unwanted medical treatment (Washington v. Harper; Sell v. United States). Criminalizing refusal significantly heightens constitutional scrutiny. Third, because the bill does not reduce the underlying sentence but adds incarceration for refusal, it may be challenged as an additional punishment. Most states with similar statutes do not create separate felony penalties for refusal. Instead, they treat compliance as a condition of supervision. HB-5493's refusal provision is therefore unusually vulnerable. If enacted as written, this bill is likely to face immediate federal litigation under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, exposing West Virginia to the risk of injunctive relief and attorneys' fees. We respectfully urge legislators to reject HB-5493 as written or amend it to remove the felony refusal provision, limit duration, and strengthen medical and judicial safeguards.

2026 Regular Session HB5433 (Finance)

Comment by: Kelli Gonot on February 13, 2026 12:26

As a special educator for 11 years in the state of WV, five years in CT, seven years in IN, and one year in OH, any legislative bill that will help fund struggling people/students and their families with physical, mental and medical issues is so worth it for so many reasons. I recently met with a family where their needs are above what we as a school can do even as our social worker and guidance counselors provide resources, there are still needs that this bill could help above and beyond what we can do. Thank you for your consideration.

2026 Regular Session HB5086 (Judiciary)

Comment by: Ronnie Williams on February 13, 2026 12:25

I'd love to just let the "first responder" and law enforcement definitions just serve us all but that ambiguity would most likely exclude a huge group of state employees. Please add "Corrections employees" specifically to the list of eligible jobs/titles. Probably the largest single group and the one with the most need for legitimate Peer Support services.

2026 Regular Session HB4712 (Judiciary)

Comment by: Amber Lilly on February 13, 2026 12:13

I have so many friends and family who have been affected by drunk drivers. We have lost many. Punishment is necessary!

2026 Regular Session HB5433 (Finance)

Comment by: Camryn Clegg on February 13, 2026 12:04

I strongly support and urge the passage of House Bill 5433. As an educator and speech therapist, I see firsthand how important it is to identify and treat hearing loss. Untreated hearing loss in childhood can lead to missed foundational skills and building blocks that support success. They experience delays in speech, communication, language, literacy, and other important academic skills. These delays impact their progress and educational access. Many hearing losses remain undetected or untreated due to the associated costs of identification and intervention. If this financial barrier were removed, we could provide better care for our community and ensure our students have equitable access to education.

Senate

House

Legislation

Follow