Public Comments
Driving under the influence of alcohol or drugs is a criminal act that poses a serious and preventable threat to public safety. Despite existing laws, impaired driving continues to claim innocent lives each year, leaving families and communities across West Virginia devastated. This legislation is introduced in response to tragic and preventable losses, including victims such as Baylee, whose life was taken by an impaired driver. These incidents are not mere accidents — they are the foreseeable result of reckless, unlawful decisions to operate a vehicle while impaired.
Current penalties have not been sufficient to deter this dangerous behavior. Stronger sentencing measures are necessary to reflect the severity of the harm caused, hold offenders fully accountable, and send a clear message that driving under the influence will carry significant legal consequences. The State of West Virginia has a duty to protect its citizens by ensuring that the punishment for impaired driving resulting in serious injury or death matches the gravity of the offense and helps prevent future tragedies.
WVRSOL opposes HB-5209 because it creates a retroactive, publicly searchable animal abuse registry that does not improve public safety and does not prevent animal cruelty. Decades of research show registries do not deter crime, and animals cannot benefit from online databases.
HB-5209 imposes duplicative annual fees totaling $250, enforced through judgment liens, expanding a registry model already under federal civil-rights litigation in West Virginia. The bill explicitly applies retroactively, raising serious ex post facto concerns under Article III, Section 4 of the West Virginia Constitution.
WVRSOL supports strong enforcement of animal cruelty laws but urges the Legislature to reject HB-5209 and avoid expanding registry-based punishment schemes that increase litigation risk without protecting animals.
My Name is Sandra Moran, Mother of Justin Moran. I have some concerns about House Bill 4761 . Extending prison times is not the answer if anything, it is only going to be a burden on the State and the families of the Inmates. I know firsthand because my Son has served seventeen years in several facilities through the WVDOC. He was sentenced to Life with Mercy and has been denied twice by the Parole board, with no good explanation given for their denial. Many are young healthy men who are role model inmates that are being denied a chance in becoming productive members of society. This bill will only increase the elderly population within the prisons leading to very expensive but necessary medical support for the aging population. Also, these inmates will not be wanted in the workforce once they are released back into society, too old and or too sick to work in any community. This bill is an economic failure for the State, for the citizens of West Virginia. There are no positive benefits for anyone. This bill does not even support what the Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation was originally put into place for. If anything, it will be going in reverse for WV. Please oppose House Bill 4761 or brace for disaster. Respectfully, Sandra Moran
WVRSOL opposes HB-5176. The bill creates a publicly searchable animal abuse registry that does not improve public safety, does not prevent animal cruelty, and instead functions as public shaming after individuals have completed their sentences. Decades of research show registries do not deter crime, and animals cannot benefit from online databases.
HB-5176 also imposes an annual $125 fee enforced through judgment liens, expanding a revenue-driven registry model already under federal constitutional challenge in West Virginia. If applied retroactively, the bill raises serious ex post facto concerns under Article III, Section 4 of the West Virginia Constitution.
WVRSOL supports strong enforcement of animal cruelty laws but urges the Legislature to reject HB-5176 or remove the public registry and fee provisions and pursue evidence-based approaches that actually protect animals and withstand constitutional review.
- This law should be passed. The current minimum and maximum sentences are too low and outdated. The fines should be doubled too.
I am asking you to Please Pass Bill 4725.WV is seeing an enormous amount of animal abuse cases.Its time to take animal abuse/cruelty serious and to start putting the abusers behind bars.
Greetings,
I am writing as a constituent, and most importantly, as a follower of Jesus Christ and an Episcopalian in the state of West Virginia. Jesus drew near to the hurting and the addicted, and confronted the shame and stigma that so many people face. I urge you to oppose House Bill 4413, which would repeal West Virginia’s existing syringe services program statute and make syringe services programs unlawful. Without syringe services, many high-risk individuals disengage entirely, increasing unsafe injection, needle litter, and preventable disease transmission—costs that will ultimately be borne by taxpayers and the health care system. There are few syringe exchange services in our state who already operate under very restrictive guidelines. According to the Center for Disease Control (CDC), syringe services are associated with a 50% reduction of HIV and Hepatitis C incidence. They also note that those who access syringe services are five times more likely to seek recovery services than those who do not. West Virginia continues to face some of the highest rates of overdose, HIV, and hepatitis C in the nation. Syringe services programs are proven to reduce the spread of infectious disease, prevent overdose deaths, and serve as a primary point of contact connecting people to treatment, naloxone, and medical care. Replacing regulation with prohibition and civil penalties will not eliminate syringe access. It will push it underground, reduce oversight, and worsen public health outcomes. The 120-day transition period offered in the bill is also unworkable, as providers are barred from offering the very services patients rely on during that transition. West Virginia should strengthen and improve oversight of syringe services programs—not ban them outright. I urge you to oppose this bill and support policies grounded in evidence, fiscal responsibility, and the health and safety of our communities. You will be in my prayers through the legislative session.Sincerely,
Rev. Christopher Scott + Episcopal priest Clarksburg WVThis young ladies life was took by a drunk driver who got behind the wheel of her vehicle and didn't even show remorse for it and I think she deserves to rot in prison cause Baylea can't be brought back and her mom dad and other family members will be hurting for the rest of their life.
I am a West Virginia constituent in Beckley, Raleigh County, and I oppose HB 4442.
West Virginia is already struggling to keep experienced people working for the state. We should strengthen retention and trust, not create new fault lines within the workforce.
This bill draws a hard line at $75,000 and treats state employees differently based on that number. It offers certain Tier II employees who retire under $75,000 access to benefits such as the use of accrued sick/annual leave for retirement credit and the Rule of 80.
But it also does something that alarms me: it exempts any employee earning $75,000 or more from classified civil service coverage, effective July 1, 2026.
That is a major change in protections and accountability. Classified coverage is part of what keeps state service stable, fair, and less vulnerable to favoritism and political churn. Cutting people out of that system because they earn over an arbitrary threshold is disrespectful, and it sends a clear message that performance and experience do not earn security; they earn fewer protections.
I am also concerned about clarity. The bill repeatedly hinges on the phrase “retire making less than $75,000,” and the stakes are high if that language is interpreted differently across agencies or job classifications.
When a bill changes benefits and civil service status, the language needs to be unmistakable and consistently applied.
If lawmakers want to improve Tier II retirement fairness, do that directly. Do not pair it with a provision that weakens civil service protections and risks driving more skilled employees away. Please vote no on HB 4442.
- Harsher punishment may deter further deaths
My name is Deborah Harpold & I fully support HB 4062, the involvement of WV & our counties allowing homeschooled students to participate in sports with students in public schools here in WV. 1) The homeschool students should not be punished by the state for not allowing them to participate & compete with public schools sports. 2) Everyone I talk to about this subject when I am asked why my grandchildren have to go to Ohio, Kentucky & other states, find out they are not allowed to compete & play within their communities, find it completely ludacris. 3) Homeschooled parents are tax payers as well as public or private schools & reserve the right to have their child participate in sports close to home. 4) Parents of homeschoolers can contribute in monetary ways at the public school toward admission and concessions.5) Homeschool students & fans can be an example of good sportsmanship since this is a huge quality that is taught. I urge legislators to pass this bill so all public, private, & homeschooled students are given equal opportunity to play & compete in sports together in the same counties in WV. Thank you
- This is way over due