Skip to content Skip to main navigation Skip to footer

Public Comments

2026 Regular Session HB4712 (Judiciary)
Comment by: Tyrus on February 3, 2026 16:07
Baylea was a young girl who had her whole life ahead of her. She was brutally killed by a drunk driver. Anyone who drives under the influence puts themselves and everyone else in harms way and Baylea’s story is a prime example of this. Doubling the sentences can help people realizes the consequences of driving under the influence and how impactful it can be on their own lives and on the lives of others.
2026 Regular Session HB4712 (Judiciary)
Comment by: Tiffny Keeton on February 3, 2026 15:57
Getting behind the wheel drunk is shameful as is. Taking an innocent life knowing you knew drinking and driving is dangerous and illegal is gut wrenching. That sweet girl probably had plans for Easter but she didn’t make it to those plans because of someone so selfish and careless. Causing death when you could have prevented it needs to be handled the right way and that person needs to pay for their actions. May Baylea rest in peace knowing she has an army behind her to make sure this doesn’t get pushed to the side.
2026 Regular Session HB4712 (Judiciary)
Comment by: Mary Mitchell on February 3, 2026 15:55
The penalty should be a little steeper because when you think about it when a loved ones killed, they’re gone forever! A longer sentence may discourage somebody from driving drugged or intoxicated.
2026 Regular Session HB4712 (Judiciary)
Comment by: Hailie Cox on February 3, 2026 15:53
I am in full support of Baylea’s Law to prevent more DUI related deaths in our community. This is a true tragedy and I hope justice is served.
2026 Regular Session HB4712 (Judiciary)
Comment by: Hunter Breeden on February 3, 2026 15:47
The punishment for taking a life while drunk driving or driving under the influence is not harsh enough, hence why nobody takes it seriously. If we increase the minimum sentence, then people would take these things more seriously. Too many innocent lives get taken due to people’s stupidity.
2026 Regular Session HB4712 (Judiciary)
Comment by: Rebecca Davis on February 3, 2026 15:45
Punishment needs to be enforced
2026 Regular Session HB4712 (Judiciary)
Comment by: Justin Elliott Miller on February 3, 2026 15:41
Impaired driving is done without considering the lives of those who choose not to drink alcohol, smoke weed or use legal medicines improperly or any of the other mind, mood and or  physically altering drug concoctions that are available to anyone.  The people who drive impaired do it willingly, not caring what happens just so they get home to sleep it off.   Stiffen the penalty.  Make it so tough that they might even think twice before drinking and snorting!
2026 Regular Session HB4712 (Judiciary)
Comment by: Taylor on February 3, 2026 15:33

It is pitiful to see how many people get off so easily in WV for drinking and driving. This bill will not only allow people to reconsider drinking and driving but will punish people for doing so. So many people die from this reckless decision of other people. Bayleas bill will represent responsibility and punishment for this action of drinking and driving

2026 Regular Session HB4712 (Judiciary)
Comment by: Jona ranson on February 3, 2026 15:31
I agree with this bill!
2026 Regular Session HB4712 (Judiciary)
Comment by: Bobbi Jeffrey on February 3, 2026 15:29
Justice for Baylea!
2026 Regular Session HB4712 (Judiciary)
Comment by: Wendi Sadzewicz on February 3, 2026 15:25
I strongly agree with the proposed bill. Incredibly careless actions that claim someone’s life should have considerably higher consequence’s!
2026 Regular Session HB4712 (Judiciary)
Comment by: Haleigh on February 3, 2026 15:21
Baylea’s Law should be passed! There are too many drunk drivers taking the lives of young people and get off free!!
2026 Regular Session HB4712 (Judiciary)
Comment by: Brenda Viars on February 3, 2026 15:16
Life is about choices! A person who gets behind a wheel while intoxicated or under the influence of a substance makes a choice to drive. Consequences for such actions must be changed. I support Baylea’s law to be established! Families of those whose life is changed because of a DUI driver are forever changed. It’s past time to prevent other families from losing loved ones because of DUI’S!! This law must be changed to prevent unnecessary deaths!
2026 Regular Session HB4712 (Judiciary)
Comment by: Jayda karyha on February 3, 2026 15:08
justice for baylea 🫂💗 I think bayleas law should be a new law , she lost her life due to a drunk driver , she deserves justice and he family does too this may never bring her back but her family deserves closure
2026 Regular Session HB4712 (Judiciary)
Comment by: Courtney Perdue on February 3, 2026 15:06
I believe that this bill should be passed for the sake of those families that have suffered from someone under the influence driving.
2026 Regular Session HB4712 (Judiciary)
Comment by: McKenzie on February 3, 2026 15:01
McKenzie O’Brien agrees to sign this
2026 Regular Session HB4712 (Judiciary)
Comment by: Morgan on February 3, 2026 14:59
This should be a law already.
2026 Regular Session HB4712 (Judiciary)
Comment by: Alyssa lightner on February 3, 2026 14:57
!!!!
2026 Regular Session HB5146 (Health and Human Resources)
Comment by: Jayli Flynn on February 3, 2026 14:56
I support HB 5146 because it recognizes the real-world impacts that outdated drug scheduling has on people with disabilities, workers, and the broader West Virginia economy. Many West Virginians live with disabilities, chronic conditions, neurological differences, or trauma-related disorders that affect how they function in daily life and in the workforce. Substances such as cannabis- and psilocybin-based compounds are increasingly studied nationwide for their potential to support symptom management, harm reduction, and quality of life when used responsibly and with appropriate education. Removing these substances from Schedule I helps reduce unnecessary criminalization that disproportionately affects people with disabilities and creates barriers to employment, housing, and stability. HB 5146 also supports workforce participation. When individuals are not automatically excluded from jobs due to outdated classifications or stigma, more people are able to work, maintain consistent employment, and contribute to the state’s tax base. This is especially important in West Virginia, where labor force participation rates remain a challenge and many residents are already managing health-related limitations. Education is another major benefit of this bill. Schedule I status discourages research, professional training, and public education. By removing these substances from the most restrictive category, West Virginia creates space for evidence-based education, public health guidance, and informed decision-making rather than fear-driven enforcement. Education reduces misuse, improves safety, and allows healthcare providers, employers, and individuals to make better-informed choices. Finally, HB 5146 has broader statewide benefits. Reducing unnecessary criminal penalties can lower enforcement and incarceration costs, ease strain on the court system, and redirect resources toward public health, treatment, and economic development. Aligning state policy with evolving research and national trends also helps West Virginia remain competitive, attract talent, and retain residents who might otherwise leave for states with more modern policies. HB 5146 is not about promoting misuse—it is about removing barriers, expanding education, supporting people with disabilities, and adopting a more practical, humane, and economically sound approach that benefits West Virginia as a whole. I urge lawmakers to support this bill.
2026 Regular Session HB4712 (Judiciary)
Comment by: Kayla Ramey on February 3, 2026 14:56
I absolutely approve.
2026 Regular Session HB4712 (Judiciary)
Comment by: Tracy Cox on February 3, 2026 14:54
Punishment alone is not enough, but accountability must come first. Families who have lost loved ones to impaired drivers live with that pain forever. The person responsible should carry consequences that reflect that reality. I urge you to pass legislation that strengthens penalties for impaired driving resulting in death and prioritizes public safety across our beautiful state.
2026 Regular Session HB5074 (Finance)
Comment by: Don Smith II on February 3, 2026 14:47
In my years of advocating for the Cannabis Industry, I have been disheartened by the over regulation and the lack of political will to improve the quality of working relationships between our industry and State Laws and Rules. I would like to think that my efforts helped lead to the investment of millions of dollars into WV's Agricultural and business sector. I'm in a unique position to bring in even more investments. Through our efforts, I've helped tens of thousands of our fellow citizens feel better and the cash taxes that have been paid were supposed to go to specific programs that would be of great help. Other States have figured out how to integrate their Cannabis Tax Cash revenues but WV has yet to figure out how to follow their own designated plan. In the meantime, I'd say we've been wasting money for custodial fees for holding this 34+ million dollars in cash. This is embarrassing and outrageous. The rule of law for me but not for thee? Therefore, with all due respect, I demand passage of this Bill. Utilize these funds.
2026 Regular Session HB5140 (Judiciary)
Comment by: Jayli Flynn on February 3, 2026 14:46
I am submitting this comment based on my personal experience working in West Virginia after relocating here from out of state. I worked for a franchised Arby’s location in West Virginia for approximately two years. During that time, I obtained a nationally recognized food protection and management certification that qualifies me to serve in management roles in all 50 states. I was offered advancement and was on track to become an assistant manager. Despite my qualifications and performance, I was later denied advancement and ultimately pushed out after my employer learned that I hold a valid West Virginia medical cannabis card and that I wear a religious head covering. I was told directly that “at the end of the day, it’s up to us who we hire.” After this, my working conditions became more difficult, and advancement opportunities were withdrawn. This felt retaliatory. I attempted to pursue the matter through existing channels, but my complaint was dropped after the employer retained private legal counsel. I was left with no meaningful remedy. This experience made it clear to me how difficult it is for workers—especially those who are new to Appalachia, who pay taxes, and who are trying to establish stable footing—to challenge discrimination when enforcement depends on narrow definitions of “employee,” short filing windows, or employer size exemptions. HB 5140 would help address these gaps by:
  • Expanding coverage to smaller employers,
  • Clarifying protections for workers who are often excluded or misclassified,
  • And providing a realistic time frame for individuals to bring forward claims after retaliation or legal intimidation occurs.
This bill would not remove an employer’s ability to hire qualified staff. It would simply ensure that hiring and promotion decisions are not used to discriminate against workers based on lawful medical treatment or religious expression, and that individuals are not effectively silenced by procedural barriers. As someone who lives and works in West Virginia, pays taxes, and sought to contribute long-term to this state’s workforce, I believe HB 5140 would provide fairer access to accountability and help ensure that civil rights protections are meaningful in practice—not just on paper. Thank you for considering my comment.
2026 Regular Session HB4712 (Judiciary)
Comment by: Mary Runion on February 3, 2026 14:43
This law needs passed because the punishment for reckless behavior causing the death of other innocent drivers is too lax. Not only are the people who end up killed by impaired drivers victimized, but friends and family of the deceased are negatively affected for life.
2026 Regular Session HB4712 (Judiciary)
Comment by: Launa on February 3, 2026 14:40
you should not be allowed to kill someone and do less time then a pedo.
2026 Regular Session HB4460 (Environment, Infrastructure, and Technology)
Comment by: Norman Launi on February 3, 2026 14:36
I respectfully ask you to put every effort into bringing forth for hearings HB 4460 and making every effort into the passage of this bill. This would correct a terrible situation that has been perpetrated against our citizens for many years by some of our current state laws. For decades, our citizens have been burdened by state code (namely 8-1-22 & 16-13A-9) that are unfair, probably illegal and possibly unconstitutional. These laws force WV citizens to both pay for a service (public sewage) that they may not need, want or use. There is no service or product that I can think of, either private or public that the government dictates that a citizen must use. This would be the same as a store dropping an appliance off at your house and forcing you to now use and pay for it whether you want, need or will use it.  This would not only be unfair but illegal, yet that is exactly what is happening in our state. Another part of the current laws that are completely unfair to the affected citizens is that they must discontinue using and render inoperable their present sewage system. This is regardless that they have paid for the system nor whether it is operating properly or not. And they are not being reimbursed for the destruction of this private property they have paid for with their hard earned dollars. In my opinion this may also be in violation of our rights under the 5th Amendment of our Constitution which, in part, states “Nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.” Home owners pay thousands of dollars for a septic system, many may still be paying on the cost thru their home mortgage. And now the government comes in and dictates that you must now pay thousands more for a service (plus pay a monthly fee) whether you want, need or will use the service? Please stop this grave injustice. Thank you for your attention and efforts into this matter. Norman Launi Sr.   Keyser, WV
2026 Regular Session HB5123 (Energy and Public Works)
Comment by: Jayli Flynn on February 3, 2026 14:35
I oppose HB 5123 in its current form because, while it is presented as a consumer data privacy bill, it falls materially short of established data-protection standards already in effect in other states, particularly California. California’s privacy framework under the California Privacy Rights Act (CPRA) provides stronger, clearer, and more enforceable protections for consumers than HB 5123. California law recognizes “sensitive personal information” as a distinct category and grants consumers the right to limit its use and disclosure, including precise geolocation, health data, biometric identifiers, and personal communications. HB 5123 does not establish comparable, heightened protections for sensitive data, leaving consumers exposed to expanded data collection and secondary use without meaningful limits. HB 5123 also lacks several core safeguards that are standard in California, including:
  • Clear limits on how sensitive personal data may be used beyond opt-out mechanisms
  • Mandatory risk or impact assessments for high-risk data processing
  • A dedicated, independent privacy enforcement agency with rulemaking authority
While HB 5123 provides basic rights such as access, deletion, correction, and opt-out of sale or sharing, these rights are weaker in scope and enforcement than those guaranteed under California law. California additionally provides data portability rights and clearer disclosure obligations that ensure consumers can meaningfully understand and control how their information is used. West Virginia residents deserve data protections that are at least equal to those already recognized as necessary in other states, not a diluted framework that lags behind national privacy standards. In a time when personal data is routinely monetized, shared, and weaponized, partial protections are not sufficient. For these reasons, I oppose HB 5123 unless it is substantially amended to:
  • Create enforceable limits on the use of sensitive personal information
  • Require risk assessments for high-risk data practices
  • Strengthen transparency, portability, and enforcement mechanisms
  • Bring West Virginia’s consumer privacy protections in line with leading state standards such as California’s
Without these changes, HB 5123 risks creating the appearance of privacy protection while failing to deliver meaningful consumer control or accountability.
2026 Regular Session HB4712 (Judiciary)
Comment by: Mary Bothwell on February 3, 2026 14:34
The woman, who was drunk and caused an auto accident, resulting in the death of Bailey, should be charged  and have to be imprisoned double the current prison time. She caused the loss of a precious young life.
2026 Regular Session HB4712 (Judiciary)
Comment by: McKenzie Dombeck on February 3, 2026 14:33
no comment.
2026 Regular Session HB4712 (Judiciary)
Comment by: Dakota McBride on February 3, 2026 14:25
Please do the right thing, this family deserves closure and dui laws in West Virginia have been far  to lenient for to long it’s time for action and it’s time for justice.
2026 Regular Session HB4712 (Judiciary)
Comment by: Denise Brumfield on February 3, 2026 14:25
This bill should be passed
2026 Regular Session HB4712 (Judiciary)
Comment by: Candice Beverly on February 3, 2026 14:23
I support this bill!!
2026 Regular Session HB4712 (Judiciary)
Comment by: Denese Richmond on February 3, 2026 14:17
First off, there is absolutely NO excuse whatsoever for driving under the influence of alcohol and/or drugs! There are taxis, Ubers, friends, family members or even strangers that can help avoid it! Along with, just simply stay put!! Too many innocent lives have been taken due to that ignorant decision! The innocent victims lives comes to an end, while leaving their families to suffer a lifetime sentence from the outcome of the terrible tragedy! Second… I’ve seen so many get away with drinking and driving resulting in death…including both of my brothers deaths, because the present laws on this matter are absolutely ridiculous! It’s never going to end, simply because there is little to absolutely no punishment! No consequences to pay! They get by with it! Plain and simple! Why?!?! Their ONE selfish choice made a never ending number of horrific life changes for parents, grandparents, children, spouses, siblings and so many more! Granted, they will more than likely do it again, and others will definitely do it, because the laws on it are embarrassingly pathetic! I pray that Baylea’s Law passes! Something has to be done! It’s not fair that Baylea’s life was brought to a tragic end, while the one that caused it walks free!
2026 Regular Session HB4712 (Judiciary)
Comment by: Ashley Carden on February 3, 2026 14:08
In memory of Baylea Craig Bowers
2026 Regular Session HB4712 (Judiciary)
Comment by: McKayla lovejoy on February 3, 2026 14:02
This should have been done years ago
2026 Regular Session HB4712 (Judiciary)
Comment by: Brittany on February 3, 2026 14:01
DUI causing death should carry a heavier penalty!
2026 Regular Session HB4712 (Judiciary)
Comment by: Mary Beth Jenkins on February 3, 2026 14:00
Justice for Baylea  
2026 Regular Session HB4712 (Judiciary)
Comment by: Courtney Stover on February 3, 2026 13:59
I  lost my best friend of 20 years, she was a daughter, sister, aunt, fur mom, a business owner and one of the most kind hearted person I had ever met. There will never be enough time to serve for the miserable life sentence Bayleas family and friends have to serve forever missing her. Please take this law into consideration. Too many people are dying and young people do not take drinking and driving seriously.
2026 Regular Session HB4712 (Judiciary)
Comment by: Madison Stanley on February 3, 2026 13:58
I agree wholeheartedly with this bill passing.
2026 Regular Session HB4712 (Judiciary)
Comment by: Whitney Workman on February 3, 2026 13:55
This bill needs to be passed. I’ve lost too many friends to drunk drivers.
2026 Regular Session HB4838 (Finance)
Comment by: Olga Gioulis on February 3, 2026 13:54
Hello   I oppose increasing fees for hybrid or electric cars. I see this as a deterrent to those of us choosing to lower our fossil fuel footprint and reduce gas useage. There is no valid reason to charge higher fees Thank You Olga Gioulis Hybrid driver Sutton WV
2026 Regular Session HB4712 (Judiciary)
Comment by: Alliyah Simpson on February 3, 2026 13:52
As someone who has witnessed many lives be ruined and taken due to someone else’s selfish decision to drink and drive, I strongly urge our representatives to pass this bill. The cost of taking a life should be far greater than 3 years. This affects more than just the victim. The victim’s families carry that pain with them for the rest of their lives.
2026 Regular Session HB4712 (Judiciary)
Comment by: Michael Gibson on February 3, 2026 13:50
This bill will be very instructive in giving criminals a more accurate depiction of the danger they caused driving under the influence. This bill also will ensure that families of any and all victims get justice for the crimes committed
2026 Regular Session HB4712 (Judiciary)
Comment by: Taygen Kimble on February 3, 2026 13:50
I believe this should ABSOLUTELY be the law!
2026 Regular Session HB4712 (Judiciary)
Comment by: Isabella Bailey on February 3, 2026 13:50
Baylee’s bill should 100% be passed. People who ignorantly get behind the wheel under the influence, and then unfortunately take another persons life, should face hard consequences. Even under intoxication, a person is very aware at the fact that they’re driving, so they’re willing getting into a vehicle knowing they could possibly cause someone else to lose their life.
2026 Regular Session HB5053 (Education)
Comment by: Olga Gioilis on February 3, 2026 13:48
Hello
I urge the committees to insure that home-school students follow a curiculuum and are properly assessed to meet educational standards in core subjects Thank You Olga Gioulis Sutton WV
2026 Regular Session HB4712 (Judiciary)
Comment by: Stacy Layne on February 3, 2026 13:47
My brother and 2 of his children were killed by a drunk driver in 2006. Fortunately for our family, we didn’t have to worry about prison sentences because the drunk driver and his drunk passenger was also killed. Maximum sentences should be mandatory for all dui causing death and I believe mandatory jail time  for all 1st offense dui. Maybe it will deter it from happening again.
2026 Regular Session HB4712 (Judiciary)
Comment by: Ashley McCourt on February 3, 2026 13:45
We all take on a great responsibility when we get behind the wheel of our vehicles. A responsibility to ourselves, and to all those around us. Anyone that chooses to drive impaired, and it is a choice, risk not only their life, but the lives of others. Should their actions take the life of someone else, the repercussions are monumental and lasting. As such, the penalties should reflect that great responsibility. I ask that you pass this bill to hopefully help negate others from driving impaired, and to make those that still do take accountability for their choices. Thank you.
2026 Regular Session HB4712 (Judiciary)
Comment by: Regina Fugate on February 3, 2026 13:43
Pass the bill
2026 Regular Session HB4712 (Judiciary)
Comment by: Madalyn Brown on February 3, 2026 13:43
I am doing so to get the bill passed.
2026 Regular Session HB4712 (Judiciary)
Comment by: Kim on February 3, 2026 13:41
This is something that should have already been in place to try and prevent things like this family has had to go through. A family should not have to beg for justice like Baylea's has had too.
2026 Regular Session HB4712 (Judiciary)
Comment by: Heather Halstead on February 3, 2026 13:41
Justice for Baylea
2026 Regular Session HB4712 (Judiciary)
Comment by: Skylar Rocchi on February 3, 2026 13:40
I believe this law would be very helpful in bettering WV. This would make those are think of driving under the influence reconsider!
2026 Regular Session HB4691 (Judiciary)
Comment by: Dennine LaRue on February 3, 2026 13:39
I oppose removing the ability of people to vote. This bill disenfranchises college students, caregivers, those who are too ill to come in person, and those who work out of state. Please vote “No”.
2026 Regular Session HB4712 (Judiciary)
Comment by: Wanda Dotson on February 3, 2026 13:39
We definitely need stricter laws for those caught getting behind the wheel and driving while under the influence. These people need to be held accountable and the laws need to be enforced. Our Loved ones matter. Baylea was taken from us way to soon. We don't need others taken away as well. Please pass this bill.
2026 Regular Session HB4712 (Judiciary)
Comment by: Inocencio Hernandez Soto on February 3, 2026 13:35
I would like to extend my condolences to the family who is pursuing this change in the WV law. It’s unfortunate for any family to have to go through such a tragic incident. I hope the House will consider passing this bill.
2026 Regular Session HB4712 (Judiciary)
Comment by: Haylee George on February 3, 2026 13:31
Absolutely breaks my heart and I absolutely, whole heartedly pray this law is passed.
2026 Regular Session HB4712 (Judiciary)
Comment by: Stephanie Massey on February 3, 2026 13:29
This should be a law because it’s taking someone’s life who was innocent
2026 Regular Session HB4712 (Judiciary)
Comment by: Amanda Caruthers on February 3, 2026 13:26
the law should hold more of a sentence so hopeful it will stop this sienceless at!
2026 Regular Session HB4712 (Judiciary)
Comment by: Adam Foster on February 3, 2026 13:26
Baylea was a a family friend with her whole life ahead of her! She was a light to our community and had many plans and very ambitious! She was kind, smart, beautiful, and a down to earth amazing person! She didn’t deserve to have her life cut short by an immature bitch that decided to get behind the wheel and drive impaired! The girl that ended Baylea’s life deserves to locked away and think about what she’s done!
2026 Regular Session HB4712 (Judiciary)
Comment by: Shelby Downs on February 3, 2026 13:21
I believe this should have been passed a long time ago. My uncle was killed by a drunk driver.
2026 Regular Session HB4712 (Judiciary)
Comment by: Erica Dennis on February 3, 2026 13:19
Too many deaths are being caused by Drunk Drivers. I strongly believe a sentencing of 3 years for a DUI seems like a slap on the hand. It needs to be taken more serious, and the drunk drivers need to be facing more serious consequences and charges.
2026 Regular Session HB4712 (Judiciary)
Comment by: Mary osborne on February 3, 2026 13:17
Im for this bill
2026 Regular Session HB4712 (Judiciary)
Comment by: Lisa on February 3, 2026 13:17
Thanks for getting justice
2026 Regular Session HB4712 (Judiciary)
Comment by: Kelley Massey on February 3, 2026 13:15
Stiffer penalties are needed
2026 Regular Session HB5119 (Health and Human Resources)
Comment by: Jayli Flynn on February 3, 2026 13:13
I support House Bill 5119 because it establishes a clear statutory right to access contraception and prevents government interference with lawful contraceptive care. This is a necessary public-health protection, particularly in a state with high rates of poverty, rural isolation, maternal mortality risk, and limited healthcare access. However, while I support the bill’s intent, I am concerned that several under-evaluated and vulnerable sub-groups are not explicitly addressed or protected in implementation, which could limit the bill’s real-world effectiveness. First, minors, foster youth, unhoused youth, and young adults transitioning out of state systems are often excluded in practice from healthcare access even when rights exist on paper. Without clear guidance on confidentiality, transportation barriers, consent standards, and provider availability, these groups may continue to face de facto denial of access. Second, rural residents and medically underserved communities face structural barriers that legal rights alone do not resolve. Many counties lack pharmacies, clinics, or providers who offer the full range of contraceptive options. A statutory right is meaningful only if access is geographically and economically realistic. Third, survivors of domestic violence, sexual assault, and reproductive coercion require discreet, safe access to contraception. Without safeguards against partner interference, parental retaliation, or institutional reporting pressures, these individuals remain at risk even when contraception is legally permitted. Fourth, LGBTQ+ individuals and others impacted by curriculum-restriction or “no-promotion” policies may experience provider hesitation, stigma, or denial of information. While HB 5119 is not a curriculum bill, access rights must be protected regardless of sexual orientation, gender identity, or perceived morality. Finally, individuals with disabilities, language barriers, or limited health literacy are frequently excluded from policy evaluations. Accessibility, informed consent, and culturally competent care must be considered to ensure equal protection under this law. For these reasons, I support HB 5119 as an essential baseline protection, while urging lawmakers to acknowledge and address these implementation gaps. A right that cannot be exercised equitably is not fully realized. Explicit attention to under-evaluated sub-groups strengthens this bill and aligns it with public-health best practices, constitutional principles, and basic fairness.
2026 Regular Session HB4712 (Judiciary)
Comment by: Charles Fromal on February 3, 2026 13:11
FOR BAYLEA
2026 Regular Session HB4712 (Judiciary)
Comment by: Rileigh Mullins on February 3, 2026 13:10
A DUI is a completely avoidable crime. The choice to drink and drive should not be a slap on the wrist with or without injury/death.
2026 Regular Session HB4712 (Judiciary)
Comment by: Stephanie stover on February 3, 2026 13:10
I think people needs to be punished for taking lives of people they shouldn’t get a slap on the wrist just for them to do it over and over again
2026 Regular Session HB4712 (Judiciary)
Comment by: Yvonne Brooks on February 3, 2026 13:10
This needs to be a law.  Heck I feel it needs to be even stricter than 6yrs min and 30yrs max.
2026 Regular Session HB4712 (Judiciary)
Comment by: Lacey Menello on February 3, 2026 13:09
People that I know and love have been affected by impaired drivers. Some of those drivers get a slap on the wrist even if a sweet life was taken. DUI needs to have a more significant punishment to encourage drivers to make better choices.
2026 Regular Session HB4069 (Finance)
Comment by: Dreydon on February 3, 2026 13:08
I disagree with this bill for many reasons. One of which is that helmets protect you, while it may be true that they most likely won't help in big crashes they can protect on a day to day. There are times where you may turn to sharp and hit you head. This is not a big, crazy crash but without a helmet can cause brain damage or other head injuries. While with a helmet you will be fine; many other facts lead me to believe this, but that one is all I needed to disagree with this bill.
2026 Regular Session HB4048 (Judiciary)
Comment by: Jordyn Williams on February 3, 2026 13:07
I agree with this bill because children should not be auctioned off as if they're a piece of"junk" to get rid of. They're humans, under-developed ones compared to adults at that; meaning that they don't even know what's going on. Also, I agree where this bill states that an unlicensed person shall not adopt a child. This helps prevent "creeps" and unworthy people from taking home a child that they do not need to have.
2026 Regular Session HB4712 (Judiciary)
Comment by: Andrea Hall on February 3, 2026 13:07
This law may change lives. Baylea was taken way too soon. She didn’t deserve any of what had happened. This family deserves peace.
2026 Regular Session HB4712 (Judiciary)
Comment by: Tammy Long on February 3, 2026 13:05
One of my best friends was killed by an impaired.  Received very little time incarcerated.   Please pass this lawE
2026 Regular Session HB4712 (Judiciary)
Comment by: Ashlynn Hatfield on February 3, 2026 13:04
I fell there should be stricter laws regarding DUI charges. Far too many people for far too long have been given slaps on the wrist for driving under the influence. We need harsher laws in place for people driving under the influence.
2026 Regular Session HB4712 (Judiciary)
Comment by: Virginia Dillon on February 3, 2026 13:03
I SUPPORT Baylee’s law. Baylea Bower was killed by a drunk/high on drugs person.
2026 Regular Session HB4080 (Judiciary)
Comment by: Olga Gioulis on February 3, 2026 12:59
I object to changing community/civic/local elections to make them partisan. They must remain NONpartisan Thank you Olga Gioulis Sutton WV
2026 Regular Session HB4372 (Education)
Comment by: Jordyn Williams on February 3, 2026 12:59
I disagree with this bill because allowing teachers to carry firearms in schools, filled with children and other educators, could go wrong in many ways. What if a teacher that is eligible to carry a firearm in school has a bad “breakthrough” due to a situation outside of school and is now putting students and other educators in danger? What if a student somehow gains possession of the firearm? These are things that we need to think about before saying that it’s a good idea.
2026 Regular Session HB4392 (Health and Human Resources)
Comment by: Robby Blair on February 3, 2026 12:59

Dear West Virginia House of Delegates Health Committee,

I am writing you to express my support for House Bill 4392, and would urge you to do the same. Among the many challenges that our great state faces, secretly poisoning our children should not be one of them. In this case, the destructive and unnecessary additives that I’m referring to are Synthetic Dyes. Synthetic Food Dyes have impacted our family in ways we would have never imagined. Over the past two years our eldest child has suffered from night terrors with episodes of sleepwalking, tremors while he sleeps, outbursts of aggression that are out of the ordinary for his personality, difficulty focusing on tasks, and potentially much worse.

Over two years ago we decided to consult with his doctors about these symptoms which were becoming life altering. His pediatrician at the time pushed for an ADHD diagnosis, which would have meant more synthetic drugs to attempt to treat his symptoms. Thankfully for us, the teachers at his Montessori School pushed back strongly at that notion. We continued to explore what environmental factors could be causing these issues. What we found was most all of his behavior and sleep-related symptoms stopped entirely after we cut synthetic dyes out of our diets. 

In the process of getting rid of synthetic dyes from our house, we’ve had doctors and pharmacists belittle our choices, because, believe it or not, this poison is in our children’s medicine! These unnecessary additives serve zero nutritional purpose other than to color the drugs and foods they’re present in. They do not add flavor, nor do they change the active ingredients to make the medicine work better. A year ago our son was diagnosed with a chronic illness. We were in and out of the hospital for weeks and in that time all of our efforts to avoid synthetic dyes were foiled. Hospitals didn’t have dye free options for medications and finding food options without dyes was close to impossible. Avoiding the consumption of synthetic dyes is truly an exhausting practice requiring massive amounts of time researching ingredients and finding brands and stores that have access to safer options. In addition, this means we have to drive to Jefferson Pharmacy in Ranson (an hour drive round trip) every time we need an antibiotic, steroid, or virtually any children-specific medicine.

Routinely, our son is prescribed new medications with his chronic illness. And as you’d expect, most of the medicine contains Red Dye 40. To make matters worse, under current FDA regulations, because the medicine is “widely available commercially” (all still tainted with synthetic dyes) the local compounding facility, which has saved us many times in the past, was barred from compounding the medicine dye free. They’re the ONLY compounding facility in our area with the capacity to make medicine without this unnecessary and harmful chemical, and even still they have unnecessary burdens placed on them.

Extensive research, including studies by the Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA), a division of the California Environmental Protection Agency, has linked synthetic dyes to adverse neurobehavioral effects in children. Chronic exposure to these dyes can impair children’s ability to learn, succeed in school, and maintain healthy relationships with peers, potentially leading to serious long-term consequences. Moreover, Red 3, is a known carcinogen, while Yellow 5 and Yellow 6 may contain carcinogenic contaminants. Red 3 and Yellow 5 have also been identified as genotoxic.

According to the OEHHA report, reactions to synthetic dyes can mimic or exacerbate existing mental health conditions like ADHD. Neurobehavioral effects caused or worsened by these dyes in children include hyperactivity, inattentiveness, restlessness, sleeplessness, irritability, and aggression. Given the risks associated with consuming synthetic dyes, I believe it is crucial that we take action to protect our children. [fact sheet: https://bit.ly/4e4kIZ9]

New research now shows a direct link to an increased risk for inflammatory bowel disease, and synthetic dyes which are commonly found in our food and medicine. [https://www.uhhospitals.org/blog/articles/2023/02/can-red-food-dye-give-you-ibd#:~:text=New research raises concerns that,known as Red Dye 40.]

I hope you'll consider championing House Bill 4392 to ban synthetic dyes in pharmaceuticals on behalf of the citizens of West Virginia. Such a change is feasible and could significantly benefit thousands of lives, particularly the most vulnerable members of our population.

Thank you for your consideration and for the work you’re doing on our behalf.

Warm regards, Robby Blair

Martinsburg, WV

2026 Regular Session HB4712 (Judiciary)
Comment by: Krista Gilkerson on February 3, 2026 12:57

Driving under the influence that results in the loss of life is not an accident, it is a preventable choice with irreversible consequences. Increasing both the sentencing range and fines for DUI causing death reflects the seriousness of these crimes and honors the lives lost due to impaired driving.

Baylea’s Law sends a clear message: our state prioritizes accountability, public safety, and justice for victims and their families. Stronger consequences can serve as a meaningful deterrent and help prevent future tragedies. I respectfully urge you to support and vote in favor of this bill. Thank you for your time, service, and consideration of this important legislation.
2026 Regular Session HB4034 (Education)
Comment by: Jordyn Williams on February 3, 2026 12:56
As a Christian, I disagree with this bill because forcing people to see the Ten Commandments every day at school is only going to push them farther away from God, not pulling them closer. Also, students practice all different types of religions, so forcing them to see the Ten Commandments everyday will more than likely make them feel less than.
2026 Regular Session HB5117 (Judiciary)
Comment by: Jayli Flynn on February 3, 2026 12:56
I oppose HB 5117 — not because restoring voting rights is inherently wrong, but because the implementation language, timing, and lack of safeguards create real harms for affected people and the election system. 1.  Notification obligations alone are insufficient While the bill requires notification of restored eligibility, there is no enforcement mechanism to ensure:
  • notifications are actually delivered,
  • contact information is kept up to date,
  • individuals understand how to re-register.
Affected individuals — especially people recently released — often lack stable housing, reliable mail service, or digital access, meaning notification alone does not ensure meaningful access to the ballot. 2.  The bill’s interaction with registration deadlines is problematic The bill specifically states that even after eligibility is restored, a person cannot register after the registration deadline for an upcoming election.  In practice, this means someone released or notified after the registration deadline may wait months for the next election — creating an arbitrary gap in political voice that disproportionately affects:
  • people with longer sentences,
  • people with late parole/probation release dates,
  • and people whose notifications are delayed.
3.  The bill lacks civil rights protections and clarity The bill makes no provisions for:
  • translation or accessible notification formats for non-English speakers or people with disabilities,
  • tracking or reporting back to the Legislature on compliance rates,
  • accountability if the Division of Corrections or Probation fails to notify eligible individuals.
A rights restoration policy without accountability, transparency, or support systems is hollow without mechanisms to ensure real, equitable access. 4.  Because voter access is a structural equity issue People disenfranchised by convictions are often already marginalized by poverty, housing instability, trauma, and barriers to employment or services. Providing mere eligibility without practical support or clear pathways to register does not address these structural barriers — which keeps communities without a voice in electing sheriffs, prosecutors, judges, or policymakers who make decisions that deeply affect them.
2026 Regular Session HB4712 (Judiciary)
Comment by: Jeri L Bunting on February 3, 2026 12:56
#justiceforbaylea  #bayleaslaw Baylea's Law...Given the fact that nothing could ever bring the victims back, victims and their families deserve harsher, stricter laws/ penalties (3-15 yrs...come on). Higher fines, stricter sanctions and LONGER prison sentences is the answer. Hoping this will pass and help everyone to make better decisions. TYSM!  
2026 Regular Session HB4712 (Judiciary)
Comment by: Linda Dalton on February 3, 2026 12:55
No one who takes another person’s life because they were under the influence of drugs or alcohol should only get 3 to 15 years … They family has lost a child and a son in law and possibly a future grand child or 2 … The law needs to change for under the influence whether it be drugs or alcohol to 20 years to maximum sentence of 40 years.
2026 Regular Session HB4712 (Judiciary)
Comment by: Chloe Prichard on February 3, 2026 12:55
This law needs to be passed, too many people get off with too low of a punishment, and never learn there lesson. I stand with Baylea’s family and all other families that have been impacted by something so avoidable.
2026 Regular Session HB4712 (Judiciary)
Comment by: Casey Dotson on February 3, 2026 12:55
please pass this law for Baylea she was such a sweet soul, and didn’t deserve this. Her family is aching. Her friends are sad and devastated past this bill so people might think twice about driving impaired hopefully they do at least
2026 Regular Session HB4712 (Judiciary)
Comment by: Carolyn Clark on February 3, 2026 12:51
This bill needs to pass, way to many are being killed or injured.
2026 Regular Session HB4712 (Judiciary)
Comment by: jaeda on February 3, 2026 12:45
please pass!
2026 Regular Session HB4712 (Judiciary)
Comment by: Teresa King on February 3, 2026 12:45
Please consider Baylea's Law.
2026 Regular Session HB4712 (Judiciary)
Comment by: Kari wagoner on February 3, 2026 12:45
I support Baylea’s law!!! There should be much harsher penalties for killing someone while under the influence..
2026 Regular Session HB4712 (Judiciary)
Comment by: Karla A Pelcastre Vargas on February 3, 2026 12:44
Hello, I hope this comment reaches the house’s floor. I’m not sure if these get read aloud or not, but I would like to comment on this bill. Anyone who dies from such a tragic and sudden incident deserves reparations and change especially in a country that believes we all must answer for the crimes we commit. I can’t say if this will give closure to the family who is pursuing this law to be changed due to the unfortunate death of their daughter, but if the house could take my comment, hopefully the other folks who plan to submit a comment as well to heart and remember a life was lost too soon due to the poorest decision one can make- driving under the influence. Drinking and driving should never be considered an accidental mistake, we need to cement that and also cement that to the future generations who will also begin to drive with your own family members, my family members, and ourselves who may travel within any roadway in WV.  
2026 Regular Session HB4712 (Judiciary)
Comment by: Mia Robinson on February 3, 2026 12:43
This bill should have been made so long ago, the minimum of taking a life away was only 3 years while the family feels it forever. I hope the new 6-30 year law gets passed so that it will make people think twice about getting behind the wheel.
2026 Regular Session HB4712 (Judiciary)
Comment by: Christina Stclair on February 3, 2026 12:42
I am in full support of this bill.
2026 Regular Session HB4712 (Judiciary)
Comment by: Alicia Johnson on February 3, 2026 12:40
Human lives are precious and priceless!!  There SHOULD be strict and harsh penalties for the ones who are selfish enough to operate a vehicle while intoxicated in ANY form!!! ESPECIALLY when they take the lives of the innocent !
2026 Regular Session HB4712 (Judiciary)
Comment by: Tina Richard on February 3, 2026 12:38
This bill needs to pass so we can have stricter laws for impaired and drunk drivers causing death. This bill may save another life!
2026 Regular Session HB5115 (Education)
Comment by: Jayli Flynn on February 3, 2026 12:36
I oppose HB 5115 because it mandates statewide “trauma-informed practices” in K-12 schools while leaving key terms and enforcement to later rulemaking, and because it is being advanced in a West Virginia policy environment that has formally moved to eliminate DEI programs and related trainings in state government and education. 1) HB 5115 requires concepts that overlap with DEI frameworks, but WV has moved to eliminate DEI initiatives HB 5115’s definition of “trauma-informed practices” explicitly includes staff activities that “recognize and prevent adult implicit bias.”  Separately, Senate Bill 474 states its purpose is to eliminate “divisions, officers, programs, trainings, and policies related to diversity, equity, and inclusion” across state entities including public schools and higher education.  West Virginia’s executive branch also publicly announced the signing of SB 474 as ending DEI programs in the state.  Result: HB 5115 creates a real risk of conflicting directives—schools may be expected to address “implicit bias” under HB 5115 while simultaneously facing institutional pressure to avoid anything characterized as DEI under SB 474. 2) HB 5115 relies on broad discretion and later rulemaking instead of enforceable safeguards HB 5115 requires the State Board to implement trauma-informed practices beginning July 1, 2026, provide training, and authorizes legislative and emergency rulemaking to implement the section.  But the bill does not build in concrete, enforceable protections such as:
  • required language-access procedures for families (translation/interpreting standards),
  • disability-specific behavioral safeguards (e.g., specific processes before exclusionary discipline for students with disabilities),
  • clear due-process requirements tied to the new “trauma-informed” discipline approach.
Instead, it largely uses general policy statements (e.g., avoid exclusionary discipline; use restorative practices; do not discriminate) and points to federal civil-rights statutes.  3) The bill’s “non-discrimination” language is not the same as practical protection—especially for students most likely to be mischaracterized as “disruptive” HB 5115 says disciplinary procedures should not discriminate based on protected categories including disability and English proficiency status and cites federal civil-rights laws.  However, without specific implementation requirements, schools can still functionally exclude or punish students by labeling protected-status related needs as “disruption” (for example, disability-related communication behaviors or language-access gaps), because the bill does not specify the procedural steps schools must take before discipline. Conclusion HB 5115 may be presented as supportive, but as drafted it is vulnerable to inconsistent and biased enforcement because it:
  • embeds “implicit bias” work inside a state policy landscape moving to eliminate DEI programs and trainings (SB 474),  
  • delegates too much to later rulemaking,  
  • lacks concrete, enforceable safeguards for disability-related behavior supports and language access.  
For these reasons, HB 5115 should be rejected unless amended to add clear procedural protections and to resolve conflicts created by the state’s anti-DEI policy direction.
2026 Regular Session HB4712 (Judiciary)
Comment by: Jennifer Smith on February 3, 2026 12:31
A parent should never have to bury a child! Especially due to someone fatal mistake of driving under the influence. Everyone has a family member they love and cherish now imagine their life was stolen from them due to that fatal mistake! You would want justice and 3-15yrs is nothing when u have stolen 70yrs from someone u dearly love! Please pass this bill
2026 Regular Session HB5112 (Health and Human Resources)
Comment by: Jayli Flynn on February 3, 2026 12:30
I oppose House Bill 5112 because, when read alongside other legislation currently advancing that expands or tightens involuntary mental-health holds, it creates a legally inconsistent and constitutionally risky framework that undermines both patient rights and public safety. HB 5112 broadly prohibits any law from requiring an individual to receive or use a medical product, from penalizing refusal of a medical product, or from requiring disclosure of whether a medical product has been used. The bill contains no exception for involuntary psychiatric holds, court-ordered treatment, emergency mental-health stabilization, or long-standing parens patriae and police-power authorities that underlie involuntary commitment law. At the same time, the Legislature is considering multiple bills that expand involuntary hold authority, lengthen confinement, or lower thresholds for detention based on mental-health determinations. Involuntary hold statutes are legally justified on the premise that confinement is therapeutic and temporary, not punitive, and that the state may provide necessary medical treatment when an individual lacks capacity or presents an imminent risk. HB 5112 directly conflicts with that framework. If the state is prohibited from requiring psychiatric medications or other medical treatments during an involuntary hold, and is prohibited from conditioning release on treatment compliance, then continued confinement becomes detention without lawful treatment authority. Conditioning release on stabilization while banning the tools required for stabilization effectively penalizes refusal of medical products through prolonged loss of liberty. This contradiction exposes the state to significant due-process concerns. Courts have historically upheld involuntary confinement only when paired with lawful treatment authority and procedural safeguards. Detention without the ability to provide or require treatment risks transforming civil commitment into punitive confinement, which is constitutionally impermissible under the Fourteenth Amendment. The bill’s sweeping language also creates operational uncertainty for hospitals, behavioral-health facilities, courts, and DHHR. Providers would be placed in an impossible position: required to manage safety risks during involuntary holds while being statutorily barred from administering or requiring standard medical treatments used to address those risks. This increases litigation exposure, delays care, and may result in longer confinement rather than fewer restrictions. Additionally, HB 5112 does not distinguish between ordinary public-health measures and mental-health crisis care, nor does it include narrowly tailored exceptions for emergency medication, court-ordered treatment, or competency restoration. The absence of such distinctions suggests the bill is overbroad and incompatible with existing mental-health law. For these reasons, HB 5112 should not advance in its current form. If the Legislature intends to expand involuntary hold authority, it must also ensure clear, constitutional treatment standards and safeguards. Advancing both policies simultaneously—expanded detention authority alongside categorical prohibitions on medical treatment requirements—creates legal instability, increases the risk of unconstitutional confinement, and ultimately harms patients, providers, and the state.
2026 Regular Session HB4712 (Judiciary)
Comment by: Lacey Fraley on February 3, 2026 12:28
A life lost is not an accident. It is the result of a decision. By signing this bill, we are making sure that those choices carry real consequences. This law is about justice for victims, support for families, and protecting our communities. This legislation is about justice for victims and their families. It is about public safety. And it is about sending a clear message to everyone on our roads: reckless behavior behind the wheel will not be tolerated. We also recognize that prevention matters. Stronger sentencing is only one part of the solution. We must continue to promote responsible choices, encourage safe transportation options, and educate our communities — especially young people — about the real, lasting consequences of impaired driving. Today’s action is taken in memory of those we have lost and in commitment to those we aim to protect. Let this law serve as both accountability and warning. Our goal is simple: safer roads, stronger communities, and fewer families forced to grieve. By signing this bill, we reaffirm a basic truth: every life matters, and we will do everything in our power to keep our communities safe.